Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Why is It Taking So Long to Have a Useable and Complete Medicines Terminology? NEHTA is Just Dragging the Chain On This.

The following announcement appeared a day or so ago.

NEHTA announces the availability of Australian Medicines Terminology (AMT) Release 2.11

28 May 2010

RELEASE NOTE

AMT Statement of Purpose

The Australian Medicines Terminology (AMT) has been developed to be fit for the purpose of unambiguously identifying for clinicians and computer systems, all Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) identified 'Registrable' medicines marketed in Australia, and is therefore available to be represented in acute sector clinical information systems for the following activities:

Prescribing

Recording

Review

Supply

Administration

Communication of the above in a Discharge Summary

While systems developers and end users might choose to deploy AMT or information generated from AMT enabled systems for purposes other than those described, no assessment with regards to fitness for purpose has been made by NEHTA.

NEHTA Announces the Availability of Australian Medicines Terminology Release 2.11

The latest update, Release 2.11 of Australian Medicines Terminology (AMT) has been published, and is available for download from NEHTA’s Secure Website. AMT is freely available for e-health software developers to use in their Australian products, under NEHTA’s licensing arrangements with the International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO®1).

AMT does not provide total coverage of all products used in the Australian health sector. As a result, it is continuously updated and releases are issued on a monthly basis. Updates include additional data items, and refinements as identified by stakeholders.

The 28 May 2010 release of AMT contains all the Australian marketed products that are included on the Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits, including the Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule (RPBS). This release includes products that become available as PBS products on 1 June 2010.

The full release notification can be found here:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/component/docman/doc_download/1007-australian-medicines-terminology-v211-release-note

This has all been going on for quite a long time.

AUSTRALIAN MEDICINES TERMINOLOGY RELEASE 1.0.0

Release Notes

19 December 2007

NEHTA publishes the Australian Medicines Terminology Release 1.0.0

Australian Medicines Terminology (AMT) Release 1.0.0 has been published. This comes after an extensive development phase incorporating feedback from our stakeholders. The scope of this release is limited as described below, and information on upcoming releases and their contents will be published as they become available.

Australian Medicines Terminology (AMT) Release 1.0.0 is an extension to SNOMED CT and access is limited to those holding license agreements managed by NEHTA.

The development of Australian Medicines Terminology has involved analysis and review by NEHTA, and has incorporated feedback from stakeholders.

The Australian Medicines Handbook (AMH) reviewed AMT and provided a report of recommendations. This is available on NEHTA’s website1. Key recommendations, as identified by NEHTA, have been incorporated into this release. A meeting held by NEHTA with stakeholders in December considered the remaining recommendations from the AMH report; the outcomes from this meeting will be posted on the NEHTA website and incorporated into subsequent AMT releases.

This release contains medicines from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) that are included in the Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits as published on the 1st December 2007, and includes over 3,500 products. More Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) items will routinely be added to the AMT through monthly updates to the Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits.

Inclusion of non-PBS items listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods will also be added to future releases of AMT. NEHTA will work closely with TGA and PBS to identify issues and ensure AMT is updated as new products become available.

----- End Extract.

Indeed it goes back much further:

In a NEHTA document dated 14 August, 2006 we have the following:

Document Title:

FACT SHEET - NATIONAL MEDICINES TERMINOLOGY

NEHTA’s Task

There are numerous systems that document drug information in Australia, all of which require slightly different information and perform slightly different functions. These include: TGA (ARTG) Register, PBS Schedule, state-wide and local hospital drug formularies and proprietary drug files such as those used by the medical software and knowledge resource industry.

NEHTA aims to ensure that terminology used for the naming and identification of all medicines registered and listed with the TGA is standardised across all e-health systems used in Australia. This will be done by developing a standard medicines terminology which is accessible to all.

NEHTA’s medicines terminology will deliver:

• A standard means of identifying branded and generically equivalent medicines; and

• Standard naming conventions and terminology, to accurately describe medications.

NEHTA will work with industry and international experts to develop the standards, specifications and infrastructure necessary for this task.

The Australian Catalogue of Medicines (ACOM) is an important contributor to this project and will be the central source of up-to-date trade product information to the medicines terminology. ACOM is available to the pharmaceutical industry to populate with current and standardised product data.

Additional Requirements

The Australian medicines terminology is also designed to:

• Be an extension to the nationally agreed terminology for all clinical terms used in Australian healthcare, SNOMED CT;

• Be used by e-health systems in both hospital and community settings;

• Be extended to include the identification of extemporaneous formulations as well as clinical trial drugs; and

• Have the ability to be extended to include medical devices.

----- End Extract.

The purposes for having a medicines terminology (among others) include:

  • Facilitating e-Prescribing and Medication Management.
  • Reduction of Medication Errors
  • Enabling Improved Accuracy of Medication Recording.
  • Improving Clinical Trials and Medication Research.
  • Assisting in Providing Quality Clinical Decision Support

For this to work properly and practically ALL prescribeable medications must be covered and covered in all their presentations (packaging etc). That is why this incomplete coverage is a major barrier to effective use.

They say:

“AMT does not provide total coverage of all products used in the Australian health sector. As a result, it is continuously updated and releases are issued on a monthly basis. Updates include additional data items, and refinements as identified by stakeholders.

The 28 May 2010 release of AMT contains all the Australian marketed products that are included on the Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits, including the Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule (RPBS). This release includes products that become available as PBS products on 1 June 2010.”

You simply can’t make effective use of a terminology that only covers a proportion of what is prescribed and used.

I am also told the present data formats in which the terminology is provided are less than ideal.

Just why is it – after so long - this is just not done and dusted so the only updates are for new and deleted medications - as it has been promised and should have been.

Some good questions on this in Senate Estimates would not hurt! It is just hopeless.

David.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Senate Estimates Alert - Wednesday June 2, 2010

I understand the e-Health Area will be addressed at Senate Estimates next Wednesday when the Community Affairs area is addressed.
The following link provides access to a .pdf which has the various ways of watching etc.
This page shows how you can watch the session live – which might just be fun given all the things happening in e-Health.

Live broadcasts:

Senate estimates hearings are broadcast live over the Internet. Details can be found at www.aph.gov.au/live
Expect some commentary once the transcripts become available!
Enjoy.
David.

Friday, May 28, 2010

Here is the Reason We Are Getting Nowhere with Ms Roxon!

The following appeared today.

Expert criticism won't help: minister

KATHARINE MURPHY

May 28, 2010

HEALTH Minister Nicola Roxon has signalled to a group of eminent mental health experts they would help their cause more if they toned down some of their public criticism.

The Health Minister met yesterday with her National Mental Health Advisory Council in Canberra. Sources say the one-hour closed-door meeting turned frosty when one of the council members, the former Australian Competition and Consumer Commission chief Allan Fels, queried the Rudd government's commitment to mental health. Ms Roxon is understood to have told the members present that she looked forward to the group's support for advancing the cause of mental health.

.....

According to sources, Ms Roxon replied that public criticism was not a good way to get results - and did not advance the advocates' cause.

Full Article Here:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/expert-criticism-wont-help-minister-20100527-whol.html

Sad this – seems like “speaking truth to power” is forbidden by those in power and that their approach is the paternalistic (maternalistic?) Joh like “don’t you worry about that!”. We will get round to e-Health (and mental and dental health) when we feel like it!

Looks like we all just meant to shut up and wait for goodness to be rained on us! She just does not want to be bothered by experts telling her she is not doing a great job.

No wonder the polls are now showing the next election will be a contest, an unthinkable thought just a few months ago, with attitudes like this. Another self-inflicted bullet to the foot I reckon.

David.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links 27-05-2010.

Here are a few I have come across this week.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and a paragraph or two. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or payment.

-----

http://www.bio-itworld.com/issues/2010/may-jun/halamka.html

Harnessing (and Securing) Meaningful Data

John Halamka talks about the future of health data.

By Allison Proffitt

May 18, 2010 | “There isn’t going to be some massive database in the basement of the White House run by Sarah Palin,” promised John Halamka, the CIO of Harvard Medical School, in his keynote at the Bio-IT World Expo. But there will be a “federated mechanism that enables us to send data from place to place for a whole variety of purposes for care and research.”

Halamka serves as the Chair of the US Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel. Of the $30 billion allotted to health care IT in the Obama Administration’s stimulus package, most of it will be distributed to hospitals and clinics after they’ve put health care IT infrastructure in place and are using it wisely. The remaining $2 billion is being distributed by the Office of the National Coordinator for health care IT advances.

“Here’s the strategy,” Halamka said. “Give $2 billion in grants to accelerate the industry. Give the industry a set of standards that are unambiguous for everything from medications, to labs, to quality measurements, to both clinical care and population health… Declare how hospitals and doctors have to use this wisely, and then certify products as being good enough to have the features and functions and capabilities to make this whole thing work.”

In the next five years as these standards are put into place, doctors and hospitals will be required to collect “meaningful” data and protect that data. “This is not using a word processor to record data!” Halamka clarified. “This is actually using codified mechanisms so that if you capture medications, problems, allergies, labs, etc. You could use them to inform drug discovery.”

-----

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/TEC-251090/Main-Culprit-In-Large-Patient-Information-Breaches-Unencrypted-Laptops

Main Culprit In Large Patient Information Breaches: Unencrypted Laptops

Dom Nicastro, for HealthLeaders Media, May 17, 2010

Perhaps it's time to make laptops look unappealing to thieves to prevent them from being stolen.

"A tongue-in-cheek solution—ugly, cumbersome, low-appeal devices," says Nancy Davis, director of privacy and security officer for Ministry Health Care in Sturgeon Bay, WI. "We had a suggestion . . . to paint them all mustard yellow."

Naturally, Davis and fellow HIPAA privacy and security officers and consultants have more serious ideas about securing laptops. And most agree—encryption is the safest way to ensure your patients' protected health information (PHI) is secured before it flies out the door.

-----

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/051810dnbuspatientprivacy.1372a8f4.html

Hospitals criticized over offers to earn or save money by sharing electronic patient data

11:11 AM CDT on Tuesday, May 18, 2010

By JASON ROBERSON / The Dallas Morning News

jroberson@dallasnews.com

The landscape for electronic health records in North Texas and across the nation has changed dramatically during the first half of this year.

Every major health system in the area has implemented, or has budgeted to implement, a system for sharing patient records electronically.

Electronic records are expected to allow doctors to coordinate care for the sickest patients, eliminate paper-transcribing errors that lead to inaccurate prescriptions, and avoid duplicate lab and imaging tests.

Medical errors alone cost the country $37.6 billion each year, according to the Institute of Medicine, a nonprofit, nonpartisan health research group based in Washington, D.C.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/health-it-consultants-demand

Health IT consultants in demand

May 18, 2010 | Bernie Monegain, Editor

OREM, UT – As healthcare organizations work to achieve meaningful use, demand for skilled consultants is high, but the jobs are more targeted and with smaller budgets than in the past, according to a new report from research firm KLAS.

The report, Shifting Demand for Consultants: Who's Hot, Who's Not, and Why, finds that nearly 70 percent of the 118 healthcare providers interviewed expect to hire a professional services firm to help with the demands of achieving meaningful use.

The study also notes that, in 2007, just five firms enjoyed significant provider mindshare, while today 13 do. Accenture, ACS, CTG, FCG (now CSC) and IBM now share mindshare with Vitalize, Dell Perot, maxIT and many others, as several key people left the top firms.

-----

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/05/17/google-flu-trends-good-at-suggesting-not-pinpointing-flu-cases/

Google Flu Trends Good At Suggesting, Not Pinpointing, Flu Cases

Google Flu Trends, the website that aims to track the spread of the flu by how many people are searching for terms related to the virus, is a guide to, rather than a finely tuned indicator of, actual cases of the flu.

That’s the conclusion, at least, of a study being presented at a meeting today of the American Thoracic Society. Researchers found that Google Flu Trends is very good at pointing out where people are experiencing flu-like symptoms. But, the abstract of the as-yet-unpublished study says, the web tool “has a lower correlation” with confirmed cases of the virus.

-----

http://www.imt.ie/news/2010/05/20plus_hospitals_now_operating.html

20-plus hospitals now operating IPMS

Gary Culliton

gary.culliton@imt.ie

More than 20 hospitals are now operating a single common patient administration system, HSE Hospital Network Manager John Hennessy has confirmed.

The €60 million Integrated Patient Management System (IPMS) is used to manage patient records and was originally intended to link up all HSE records nationwide to aid treatment of patients.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9176892/E_health_and_Web_2.0_The_doctor_will_tweet_you_now

E-health and Web 2.0: The doctor will tweet you now

Patients can now meet their doctors in 'the cloud'

Lucas Mearian

May 20, 2010 (Computerworld)

When Janel Wood's 9-year-old son recently began experiencing migraines, the working mother decided to try a new company health care program that allowed her to communicate with a doctor through videoconferencing, voice over IP, and instant messaging.

While her son was home for lunch, Wood logged onto a local medical practice's Web site and connected via videoconferencing and IM with the doctor on duty, who then reviewed her son's electronic medical record (EMR) online. The doctor sent Wood links to migraine articles and podcasts and prescribed more hydration for her son, which worked over time.

"I ended up bringing [my son] back to school before missing any classes, which he was kind of bummed about. It was so quick and efficient," Wood said.

While telemedicine may seem a cold and impersonal approach to patient care, physicians say it's exactly the opposite. And they are quickly embracing it as a way to foster a more intimate relationship with patients and educate them about treatments prior to office visits.

-----

Healthcare Data Risk Greatest From Human Error

Despite advances in security technology and regulations, human mistakes will likely continue to cause data security breaches that jeopardize patient privacy.

By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee, InformationWeek

May 20, 2010

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224900435

Human foibles will likely continue to cause data security breaches despite advances in the security technology until users fully understand the risks involved with their behavior, said healthcare CIOs at during an e-health panel at the MIT Sloan CIO Symposium in Cambridge, Mass. on Wednesdays.

While advancements in security technology better protects patient data, and regulations like HIPAA aim to set rules for information security and privacy, some breaches boil down to humans making mistakes.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/data-storage-top-concern-healthcare-providers

Data storage of top concern to healthcare providers

May 19, 2010 | Kyle Hardy, Community Editor

SANTA CLARA, CA – With the introduction of electronic health records, health data storage is expected to be high on providers' to-do lists. However, storing this data will be challenging, said Bill Burns, senior director for Hitachi Data Systems.

"The problem is split into two parts," said Burns. "The first 50 percent of the problem is the IT issue – how do I manage, back up, secure it? The second is how to integrate the technology with other applications at the provider's facility."

Burns said that when it comes to data in healthcare, he is seeing a trend shift. The largest amount of data (Excel files, videos, clinical images) are what is called unstructured file data, said Burns. This kind of data is expected to grow with the digitization of medical records and will be hard to store and secure.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=73774

Federal policy workgroup to focus on state HIE

By Nancy Ferris
Wednesday, May 19, 2010

A Health IT Policy Committee workgroup will focus its attention on state-level health information exchange issues, after identifying those that need policy solutions.

Micky Tripathi, president and CEO of the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, told the federal Health IT Policy Committee Wednesday that the information exchange workgroup, which he co-chairs, will narrow its focus on state HIEs as early adopters begin to set them up.

In a brief report to the Policy Committee, Tripathi said many HIE issues may arise at the state level and at the intersections of state and federal HIT implementations.

-----

Execs View Telehealth As Game Changer

Telehealth will transform healthcare, but reimbursement models, fear of technology are barriers to adoption, study shows.

By Nicole Lewis, InformationWeek

May 19, 2010

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224900404

Through the use of telehealth technology, the U.S. healthcare delivery systems will undergo a significant transformation that will improve healthcare outcomes and cut costs, a new study shows.

The study, conducted by research firm Penn Schoen Berland on behalf of Intel, interviewed 75 C-level executives at hospitals, home health organizations, and insurance companies. Among the findings, 89% of healthcare decision makers believe telehealth will transform healthcare in the next 10 years.

The study also revealed that telehealth solutions, which deliver health-related services and information via telecommunications and computing technologies, are currently being used by two-thirds of healthcare professionals with an 87% satisfaction rate.

-----

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9176883/P2P_networks_a_treasure_trove_of_leaked_health_care_data_study_finds?source=rss_news

P2P networks a treasure trove of leaked health care data, study finds

Eight months after passage of HITECH Act, data leaks still a problem in health care industry

Jaikumar Vijayan

May 17, 2010 (Computerworld)

Nearly eight months after new rules were enacted requiring stronger protection of health care information, organizations are still leaking such data on file-sharing networks, a study by Dartmouth College's Tuck School of Business has found.

In a research paper to be presented at an IEEE security symposium Tuesday, a Dartmouth College professor Eric Johnson will describe how university researchers discovered thousands of documents containing sensitive patient information on popular peer-to-peer (P2P) networks.

-----

http://www.crmbuyer.com/story/The-Big-Business-of-Electronic-Health-Records-Part-2-70016.html

The Big Business of Electronic Health Records, Part 2

Proposed federal regulations for obtaining funding could actually stymie the adoption of EHR programs, say critics. "While the proposed rules would push the industry forward through a challenging set of requirements, we have concerns that the proposals do not accurately reflect the amount of time it will take providers of all sizes to efficiently prepare to demonstrate 'meaningful use,'" said the eHealth Initiative's Diane Jones.

Part 1 of this series discusses the growing trend toward adoption of electronic health records among healthcare providers, insurance companies, and government agencies.

The U.S. healthcare sector is about to embark on a multibillion dollar information technology investment program to provide electronic medical records for tens of millions of patients.

-----

http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/5929/decision_day_for_morecambe_bay

Decision day for Morecambe Bay

21 May 2010

D-Day has arrived for University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust on whether it is allowed to proceed with plans to bcome the first acute hospital to take the delayed Lorenzo hospital information system.

NHS chief information officer Christine Connelly is due to decide today whether to give University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust her approval to go-live with iSoft Lorenzo.

E-Health Insider under understands that Connelly will today again personally visit the hospital trust, the latest in a series of visits to the Northwest hospital trust.

-----

http://healthcare-informatics.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=29F49F972B91490194E058F0455612EA

A Paradigm Shift on Quality Reporting

CIOs grapple with challenges of moving quality reporting to electronic health record systems.

By David Raths

Hospital CIOs have identified quality reporting from electronic health record (EHR) systems as one of their greatest challenges related to meaningful use compliance under the federal American Reinvestment and Recovery Act/Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (ARRA-HITECH) Act. In March, David Muntz, senior vice president and CIO of the Baylor Health Care System in Dallas, told the federal Office of the National Coordinator Standards Implementation Workgroup that the most significant impact of meeting meaningful use on his health system’s existing plan has to do with the required quality reporting. Baylor eventually would like the activities of documentation and ordering to produce the data it currently collects manually through chart abstraction. But he added, “If we rush to meet the Stage 1 criteria before we have deployed our enterprise-wide designed EHR in our hospitals and ambulatory settings, we will have to sub-optimize our processes to gather some of the numerators and denominators required to compute the proposed metrics.”

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/colorado-hie-medicity-hitech-40311-1.html

Colorado Picks its HIE Partner

HDM Breaking News, May 20, 2010

The Colorado Regional Health Information Organization has selected Medicity Inc. as the core platform vendor for the state's health information exchange.

The RHIO will start implementation in the San Luis Valley region, which spans 8,000 square miles in southern Colorado and includes the towns of Del Norte, Monte Vista, Alamosa and San Luis. A second phase is expected this summer with letters of intent received from Boulder, Denver, Colorado Springs and the northern Colorado region.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/hie-ehr-illinois-hospital-physician-40304-1.html

Northern Illinois Gets an HIE

HDM Breaking News, May 18, 2010

Centegra Health System, serving northern Illinois with hospitals in McHenry and Woodstock, will create a health information exchange with community physicians.

The delivery system also will offer electronic health records software to physicians not yet using the technology. Centegra will implement the Elysium Exchange HIE platform software of Axolotl Corp., San Jose, Calif., which includes the CCHIT-certified Elysium 9 ambulatory EHR.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/ehrs-must-support-two-distinct-types-care-partners-cio-says/2010-05-20

EHRs must support two distinct types of care, Partners CIO says

May 20, 2010 — 11:23am ET | By Neil Versel

Ever notice how so many examples of how EHRs can improve care focus on diabetes? That's because diabetes care has many clear protocols, copious amounts of scientific evidence that gets included in clinical decision support and clear quality measures.

But not all care is like diabetes care, as Partners HealthCare System CIO John Glaser notes in Hospitals & Health Networks. "The outcomes of a stroke are variable and difficult to measure. There are often no crisp guidelines for treating the fragile, elderly patients with multiple chronic diseases. And it would be a challenge to adequately structure the documentation of the clinician's thought process for a patient with a rare disease that is eluding diagnosis," Glaser writes in one of his regular columns for the magazine.

According to Glaser, healthcare can be broken down into iterative care--making diagnoses--and sequential care, which involves following widely accepted patterns of treatment. "The EHR must accommodate this diversity within an organization as well as for an individual clinician (a clinician may see this diversity daily) and for a patient (any patient may move from iterative care to sequential care and back again)," he writes.

-----

http://www.fierceemr.com/story/hospital-cpoe-collaborative-market-order-sets-zynx/2010-05-20

Hospital CPOE collaborative to market order sets via Zynx

May 20, 2010 — 1:10pm ET | By Neil Versel

Three major health systems that have jointly developed more than 1,000 clinical order sets are joining with Zynx Health to market the order sets to other providers implementing computerized physician order entry.

"CPOE is hard," Dr. Loren Hauck, senior VP and CMO of Adventist Health System, Winter Park, Fla., tells FierceEMR. "We want to share our learning and best practices with others that may not be as far along" toward achieving meaningful use of EMRs.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100519/NEWS/100519927

HHS to survey Medicare patients on PHR use

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: May 19, 2010 - 11:30 am ET

Seventeen months after launching a pilot project to test whether Medicare beneficiaries will use personal health records, HHS is going back to Utah and Arizona to ask PHR users what they think about the systems.

HHS last week published official notice in the Federal Register of its intent to conduct an evaluation this fall of the pilot program, including a survey of 500 Medicare beneficiaries to assess user satisfaction, as well as barriers or facilitators of PHR use.

-----

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37363.html

Resisting the push to digitize

By: Sarah Kliff

May 18, 2010 05:06 AM EDT

Electronic health records are often discussed as a panacea in health policy, with the potential to streamline record keeping, reduce costs and improve quality of care in one fell swoop.

So it’s no surprise that the federal government has propped up the industry with $19 billion for health information technology from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, and bolstered that support with provisions in the health care reform law.

But as a particularly stringent and new regulation nears, numerous medical groups say that the aggressive government push to digitize is too much, too soon. Health information technology in the United States remains highly fragmented, so any large overhauls, experts warn, must work on a timeline that stretches years into the future.

-----

http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/5913/pcts_look_for_gp_agreement_to_scr

PCTs look for GP agreement to SCR

18 May 2010

Primary care trusts are seeking agreement from GP practices to go ahead with the creation of Summary Care Records in areas where their roll-out had been suspended.

NHS East of England told EHI Primary Care that the process to create SCRs will go-ahead in areas where agreement has been reached on whether adequate information has been provided to patients and practices.

A spokesperson added: “The process to reach agreement that adequate information has been provided is ongoing.”

In a letter to PCT chief executives sent in April Dave Marsden, director of strategic IM&T, said the SHA's assurance of PCT communication plans would be strengthened following the BMA's concerns and no SCRs would be created for a practice until it was content that it had been "fully briefed" and patients informed of their choices.

-----

http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/5917/gp_labels_scr_up-load_a_%27disaster%27

GP labels SCR up-load a 'disaster'

18 May 2010

A GP whose practice has just uploaded Summary Care Records has heavily criticised the process, which she claims has been a "disaster."

Dr Linda Parker is a principal at one of four GP practices based at Roebuck House in Hastings, East Sussex, which have begun uploading records over the past two to three weeks.

Dr Parker told EHI Primary Care that the upload had been “a complete disaster for the practice” with large numbers of patients reporting no knowledge of the Public Information Programme.

She said: “I have had a lot of patients saying they haven’t received a letter when I have asked them about it and none of my own neighbours have received a letter.”

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100518/NEWS/100519932

Poll finds e-communications are in demand

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: May 18, 2010 - 11:30 am ET

About half of the parents of children ages 17 or younger in a recent national survey indicated that they'd like to communicate online with their child's physician's office for such clinical and administrative purposes as requesting records or refilling a prescription.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100518/NEWS/100519930

Online physician ratings mostly positive: study

By Andis Robeznieks / HITS staff writer

Posted: May 18, 2010 - 11:30 am ET

Few patients are posting online reviews of their physicians and, among those that do, most of the reviews they write are positive, according to a study published on the Journal of General Internal Medicine's website.

Tara Lagu, a Tufts University School of Medicine assistant professor, and colleagues at the Center for Quality of Care Research at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., took a random sample of 300 Boston-area doctors and searched for reviews posted by their patients on 33 physician-rating websites. They found 190 reviews for 81 of the physicians in the sample with 88% of the reviews positive, 6% negative and 6% considered neutral.

-----

http://www.govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=73735

Civil rights office steps up health privacy enforcement

By Mary Mosquera

Thursday, May 13, 2010

The HITECH Act significantly strengthened the available legal tools for enforcing health information privacy law, according federal health officials, who pledged to step up their pursuit of health security and privacy rule violators.

Last year’s health IT law tightened the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act’s (HIPAA) security and privacy rules, increased fines, and centralized oversight in HHS’ Office of Civil Rights. OCR, which issued an enforcement rule that took effect in November, can now impose penalties of up to $1.5 million per violation.

“OCR has significantly strengthened tools with which to obtain compliance,” said Marilou King, senior attorney and acting senior advisor for privacy compliance and enforcement in HHS’s Office of General Counsel Civil Rights Division.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/blogs/blog_Gillespie_telehealth_American_Well-40293-1.html

Tackling Health Care’s Scheduling Problem

Greg Gillespie

Health Data Management Blogs, May 17, 2010

Sometimes someone really hits the nail on the head. And I think Roy Schoenberg, M.D., CEO of American Well, did when I recently spoke with him about consumer disconnect.

The timing was perfect because I had recently suffered that disconnect. I had a horrific sinus infection, the same one I get every spring, and called my primary care doctor. A nurse got back to me, listened to my litany of complaints and told me that I couldn’t get a prescription over the phone. By that time I saw a doctor three days later and got my diagnosis confirmed I already had an ear infection. And to add to my misery I was away from my job, this job I so dearly love, for a half-day.

The way Roy sees it, and I wholeheartedly agree, is that we don’t so much have a technology or expertise problem when it comes to providing care; we have a chronic scheduling problem. Proving the most timely and high-impact so often hinges on everyone--providers, technicians, patients, families--being in the right place at the right time. And, let’s be honest, that takes a miracle and the whole process is so often unnecessary. I as a consumer have a lot of technology at my fingertips, as do doctors and nurses. No reason it shouldn’t be put to good use when I have a sinus infection and no car, and a doc has an hour of free time to check in online.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/security-federal-trade-commission-breach-40278-1.html

Security: Strive for 'Defensive Depth'

HDM Breaking News, May 13, 2010

Good data security means having "defensive depth" embedded in information systems, says Alain Sheer, an attorney in the Federal Trade Commission's division of privacy and identity protection. "Relying on one defense is problematic."

Speaking at the Safeguarding Health Information Conference in Washington, Sheer gave examples of the need for multiple levels of defense. An organization, for instance, may encrypt data but have weak user authentication controls. This enables a hacker to access the encryption module and find the decryption key.

Sheer also gave several examples of major breaches of well-known retailers who were amazingly lax in protecting sensitive consumer information. Petco Animal Supply, for instance, on its Web site collected consumers' names, addresses, and payment card numbers with expiration dates. The Web site stated that data was encrypted, but it was not. The FTC charged the company with deception and in a settlement order mandated a comprehensive information security plan and independent assessments of Petco's security measures every three years for 20 years.

-----

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=73747

HHS to study patient perceptions of health IT

By Mary Mosquera

Friday, May 14, 2010

The Health and Human Services Department will conduct two surveys to find out more about patient perceptions and preferences for the use of health IT in the course of their healthcare.

HHS said it knows little about patient perceptions of practices that use electronic health records (EHRs) or about patient preferences about what functions they want from a personal health record (PHR).

HHS announced the two studies in the May 14 Federal Register.

-----

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100517/NEWS/100519941

Blumenthal offers meaningful-use approaches

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: May 17, 2010 - 11:30 am ET

David Blumenthal, head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at HHS, took to e-mail and the Web last week to get the word out about an alternative way for providers to communicate to meet federal meaningful-use requirements and qualify for billions of dollars in health IT payments.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the stimulus law, requires that providers must meaningfully use an electronic health-record system to qualify for up to an estimated $27.3 billion in federal reimbursements.

Last December, the CMS, which will administer the EHR funding under the Medicare and Medicare Advantage programs, issued a proposed rule defining the meaning of meaningful use. Congress, however, mandated three meaningful-use criteria that providers must meet—electronic prescribing, reporting quality measures to HHS and exchanging information electronically to improve patient care.

-----

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/breach-va-congress-letter-buyer-40290-1.html

Rep. Buyer: Why Isn't VA Data Encrypted?

HDM Breaking News, May 17, 2010

Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.), ranking member of the U.S. House Committee on Veterans Affairs, has sent a letter to VA Secretary Eric Shinseki expressing his "deepest" concern over the recent theft of an unencrypted laptop from a VA contractor, and the department's information security procedures.

Information Week first reported on the laptop theft. It was stolen from a personal vehicle on April 22 and contained sensitive information, including Social Security numbers, on more than 600 veterans receiving pharmacy services.

-----

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/study-health-it-care-coordination-key-meeting-national-cholesterol-guidelines

Study: Health IT, care coordination key to meeting national cholesterol guidelines

May 14, 2010 | Molly Merrill, Associate Editor

DENVER – Kaiser Permanente is crediting healthcare information technology and care coordination as helping more than 40 percent of very high-risk patients reach national cholesterol guidelines – a feat that past studies indicate is difficult to achieve.

In 2004 the National Cholesterol Education Program issued revised cholesterol goals recommending people at very high-risk for heart disease move their target LDL or "bad" cholesterol from 100 mg/dL to 70 mg/dL to reduce the risk for another heart attack.

Many health experts have questioned the legitimacy of such an aggressive goal. Previous research has found only between 15 and 30 percent of patients were able to get their cholesterol to the recommended goal.

------

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/perspectives/2010/in-search-of-health-information-exchange.aspx

Monday, May 17, 2010

In Search of ... Health Information Exchange

Californians think big -- as the seventh largest economy in the world we have to. And as one might expect we boast some of the biggest health IT successes and failures.

Kaiser Permanente recently completed a $4 billion-plus electronic health record initiative -- considered the largest completed civilian health IT project in the country.

While I was at the California HealthCare Foundation, I witnessed firsthand the market failure that led to the closure of the $10 million Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange. Its closure taught us that health information exchange was not exempt from the power of market forces.

While grants can be critical to initiate efforts, they are insufficient to sustain them. It is now painfully clear that we need to better understand and respect market forces and harness them to our advantage. In other words, we need to know our customers and provide valuable services worth paying for.

-----

http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2010/05/ehealth_laggard.html

E-Health Laggards Need To Start Moving Now

Posted by Marianne Kolbasuk McGee, May 17, 2010 03:59 PM

Healthcare providers starting from scratch with projects to implement e-health record systems in hopes of cashing in on the government's $20 billion-plus meaningful use incentive programs had better get going.

It's going to take a while for healthcare providers to get those systems running and users trained on them, let along using their new digital records, e-prescribing, computerized order-entry and other applications in the "meaningful" ways the federal government will require before it sends out HITECH rewards to doctors and hospitals.

Certainly, healthcare providers are in a bit of a quandary: Even though the government's health IT financial incentives begin kicking in next year, the "meaningful use" compliance requirements for qualifying for those rewards aren't even settled yet, and it's already mid-2010. The Dept. of Health and Human Services expects the rules to be finalized and published by "end of spring."

-----

Enjoy!

David.

A Word That Really Describes NEHTA – A Quango!

A correspondent pointed out the Wikipedia entry for the term.

This is found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quango

It seems the description is as follows:

“Quango or qango is an acronym (variously spelt out as quasi non-governmental organisation, quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisation, and quasi-autonomous national government organisation) used notably in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia and elsewhere to label colloquially an organisation to which government has devolved power. In the United Kingdom the official term is "non-departmental public body" or NDPB.”

The best bit is this sentence:

“Depending upon one's point of view, the separation of a quango from government might be either to allow its specified functions to be more commercially exercised, independently of politics and changeable government priorities, and unencumbered by civil service practices and bureaucracy; or else to allow an elected minister to exercise patronage, and extend their influence beyond their term of office, while evading responsibility for the expenditure of public money and the exercise of legal powers.

The last few words really ring true!

At least we now have an accurate name for it!

Sorry, usual service will now resume.

David.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

NEHTA is Attempting to Escape Accountability By Refusing To Meet With Senate Estimates Committee. Why and What Does this Mean?

I had some contact from the Opposition today.

The gist was as follows.

1. We all know Queensland Liberal Senator Sue Boyce, has been a prominent critic of NEHTA and the Government’s bungling on its e-health program – and has been keen to get at the truth on these matters.

2. It seems she has been told that NEHTA officers will not be attending the Senate Estimates Committee next Thursday (June 3) and face close questioning about what they have been doing with millions of dollars of taxpayers’ money, because it is a private company and not part of the Department of Health and Ageing.

3. We know DoHA boss Jane Halton, is a member of the company Board, and so she will be expected to answer all NEHTA questions – which means anything of any detail and substance will have to go on notice.

4. This means government spin doctors will be able to take their time to massage the replies which may not even surface this side of the election.

Given NEHTA wants to get some legislation passed by the Senate and wants to be involved in the new funding for e-Health this seems rather like refusing public accountability is administering a ‘bullet to the foot’.

If they don’t front we will know they have some major issues to hide!

Please understand my blogs key 3rd objective is to get accountability from NEHTA. They now know they need to do better in this regard as at least the Opposition has noticed just how un-accountable they are!

To quote:

“The third, sadly, is now to try and force accountability for the actions of, and the funds spent, by NEHTA.”

Making sure they are at the Senate Estimates hearings is vital if NEHTA wishes to survive Pty Ltd Company or not!

I will take help from anyone to get some accountability. I am totally non-partisan on all this – I just want disclosure and honesty – as has been a theme of the blog since 2006.

David.

The US Health Information Exchange Initiatives. We Need to Leverage Them!

The following appeared a few days ago and I think is worth passing on.

CONNECT & NHIN Direct: What Are They?

HDM Breaking News, May 20, 2010

There has been a lot of talk in recent months of two federal initiatives to ease connectivity in the health care industry-CONNECT and NHIN Direct. One of them is real software and the other is an emerging recipe for connectivity. Here's a primer.

CONNECT is real, downloadable software with three components:

* Gateway, which implements nationwide health information network specifications for secure data exchange over the Internet;

* Enterprise Service Platform, which enables an organization to plug practice management and electronic health records systems into a framework to communicate with the Gateway; and

* Universal Client Framework, a platform to develop end-user applications that support meaningful use if a physician doesn't have an EHR.

CONNECT includes one or more open source applications for each of the components, plus some private vendor tools such as IBM/Initiate Systems' master patient index software.

The Department of Health and Human Services in March 2008 awarded a contract to Melbourne, Fla.-based Harris Corp. as the prime contractor to develop CONNECT, with Chantilly, Va.-based Agilex Technologies and Richardson, Texas-based Scenpro Inc. as subcontractors.

The Federal Health Architecture initiative, a collaboration of multiple federal departments and agencies, in April 2009 released CONNECT's source code as open source and began developing the open source community. Releases are announced on a quarterly basis, says David Riley, CONNECT initiative lead contractor and owner of Enaptics Consulting LLC, Marshall, Mo.

Organizations using CONNECT, some in full production and others in testing stages, include HealthBridge in Cincinnati, Thayer County Health Services in Nebraska, Indianapolis-based Regenstrief Institute, Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, Kaiser Permanente, and Orange County and Redwood MedNet in California.

NHIN Direct isn't developing connectivity software, but the tools to guide development. These include descriptions of standards, services and policies to enable secure health data transmission over the Internet.

Lots more detail is here:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/interoperability-connect-nhin-direct-hie-40313-1.html

The article provides 2 links:

The first is to http://nhindirect.org

Here is the intro to the front page:

The NHIN Direct Project


NHIN Direct is a project to expand the standards and service definitions that, with a policy framework, constitute the NHIN. Those standards and services will allow organizations to deliver simple, direct, secure and scalable transport of health information over the Internet between known participants in support of Stage 1 meaningful use.

The key deliverables of the project will be standards and service definitions, implementation guides, reference implementations, and associated testing frameworks. The project will not run health information exchange services.

The Nationwide Health Information Network is a set of standards, services and policies that enable secure health information exchange over the Internet. Several Federal agencies and healthcare organizations are already using NHIN technology to exchange information amongst themselves and their partners. This project will expand the standards and service descriptions available to the NHIN to address the key Stage 1 requirements for meaningful use, and provide an easy "on-ramp" for a wide set of providers and organizations looking to adopt. At the conclusion of this project, there will be one nationwide exchange, consisting of the organizations that have come together in a common policy framework to implement the standards and services.

The second provides this link to connectopensource.org which supports the community that is developing the key enabling software.

This is discussed here:

http://www.connectopensource.org/about/what-is-CONNECT

What is CONNECT?

CONNECT is an open source software solution that supports health information exchange – both locally and at the national level. CONNECT uses Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) standards and governance to make sure that health information exchanges are compatible with other exchanges being set up throughout the country.

This software solution was initially developed by federal agencies to support their health-related missions, but it is now available to all organizations and can be used to help set up health information exchanges and share data using nationally-recognized interoperability standards.

CONNECT can be used to:

  • Set up a health information exchange within an organization
  • Tie a health information exchange into a regional network of health information exchanges
  • Tie a health information exchange into the NHIN

By advancing the adoption of interoperable health IT systems and health information exchanges, the country will better be able to achieve the goal of making sure all citizens have electronic health records by 2014. Health data will be able to follow a patient across the street or across the country.

-----

The Solution

Three primary elements make up the CONNECT solution:

  • The Core Services Gateway provides the ability to locate patients at other organizations, request and receive documents associated with the patient, and record these transactions for subsequent auditing by patients and others. Other features include mechanisms for authenticating network participants, formulating and evaluating authorizations for the release of medical information, and honoring consumer preferences for sharing their information. The NHIN Interface specifications are implemented within this component.
  • The Enterprise Service Components provide default implementations of many critical enterprise components required to support electronic health information exchange, including a Master Patient Index (MPI), XDS.b Document Registry and Repository, Authorization Policy Engine, Consumer Preferences Manager, HIPAA-compliant Audit Log and others. Implementers of CONNECT are free to adopt the components or use their own existing software for these purposes.
  • The Universal Client Framework contains a set of applications that can be adapted to quickly create an edge system, and be used as a reference system, and/or can be used as a test and demonstration system for the gateway solution. This makes it possible to innovate on top of the existing CONNECT platform.

----- End Extract.

It is my view that the drive being provided by the ‘meaningful use’ criteria for re-imbursement in the US will have the effect of seeing the rapid evolution of solutions (both commercial and open source) to meet those criteria and result in a very advanced National Health Information Network emerging over the next few years in the US.

The implementations that are presently appearing are deploying a variety of Standard Architecture bases – see here:

http://nhindirect.org/Specifications+and+Service+Descriptions

And as experience develops it seems likely a firm base of clarity on which approaches are best will emerge.

It seems to me there is a lot here that could support the proposed Local Health Networks and facilitate considerable progress pretty quickly.

I would love the NEHTA System Architects to tell me just what is wrong with this approach – but I am sure they don’t read here!

David.

AusHealthIT Man Poll Number 20 – Results – 26 May, 2010.

The question was:

Is $476M Over 2 Years Enough To Make A Real Difference to Australian E-Health?

For Certain

- 7 (17%)

Probably

- 6 (15%)

Not Sure

- 4 (10%)

Probably Not

- 9 (23%)

No Way

- 13 (33%)

Votes : 39

Comment:

This is a pretty clear result. There is major scepticism that the planned e-Health spending will actually make a major difference – 56% No – 32% Yes

Again, many thanks to all those who voted

David.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

The Opposition is To Seek Amendments to the Health Identifier Service Bill.

The following press release has just been made available.

ANDREW SOUTHCOTT MP

Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for Regional Health Services, Health and Wellbeing

Federal Member for Boothby.

MEDIA RELEASE.

009/10

25 May 2010

Healthcare Identifiers Legislation Needs Tightening

The Coalition will be moving a number of amendments to strengthen the e-Health legislation which is currently before the Senate.

Whilst we support the intent of this Bill, the Opposition believes that this Bill can be strengthened through greater parliamentary oversight to protect patients and their privacy.

Coalition Senators on the Senate Community Affairs Committee raised a number of concerns about the breadth of this Bill and proposed several amendments to increase the scrutiny of the operation of health identifiers and the service operator.

In particular, the Bill as it stands continues to raise concerns about privacy and the possibility of function creep. It also leaves many crucial decisions to be made by the Minister through regulation, rather than requiring legislation and parliamentary approval.

Given the importance of this legislation, it is critical that there is thorough Parliamentary oversight to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to protect individual privacy and ensure the integrity of the e-Health system.

End of Release.

It seems to me there is no harm in making sure we have strong privacy and oversight arrangements. I will be interested to see just what the Opposition proposes. If they are reasonable the Government should just accept the amendments and move forward.

David.