Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Denmark Shows It How Might Be Done And Indeed is Actually Being Done!

The following long article appeared a few days ago.

Denmark physicians, specialists all use EHRs: report

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: March 17, 2010 - 11:00 am ET

The European Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, in its most recent, 2009 report on healthcare spending, pegs Denmark's total healthcare expenditures at 9.8% of its gross domestic product with spending on a per capita basis equivalent to $3,512 per year, compared with U.S. expenditures at 16% of GDP and $7,290 per capita per year.

Of course, Denmark's numbers are for a country of 5.5 million people with a universal healthcare system that is largely—but not entirely—paid for by government-raised taxes—or socialized medicine.

Danes pay slightly more out-of-pocket for their healthcare, on a percentage basis, at 13.8% of total household per capita healthcare spending, than do Americans, at 12.2%. But Danes are guaranteed health insurance from one of just two taxpayer-funded, government-run plans, while we Americans don’t allow bureaucrats to come between us and, well, you know the rest.

So, how is Denmark faring compared to the magic-of-the-market U.S. in the race to implement healthcare information technology?

As the U.S. is only just now embarking on its great experiment of socializing up to 85% of the cost of purchasing and installing electronic health-record systems in hospitals and physicians offices, the not-for-profit Commonwealth Fund reports that Denmark has—figuratively speaking—blown the doors off the U.S. in electronic health-record adoption, at least among office-based, primary-care physicians.

How did Denmark do it?

They did a lot of things right, things we should emulate, according to the Commonwealth report, “Widespread Adoption of Information Technology in Primary Care Physician Offices In Denmark: A Case Study, including using a combination of peer pressure, public awareness and, since 2004, a government mandate for physicians to adopt and use EHRs.

Today, according to the report’s authors, Denis Protti and Ib Johansen, virtually all primary-care doctors in Denmark use highly functional EHRs to order prescriptions, draft clinical notes about patient visits, send appointment reminders and communicate with hospitals and other physicians, including specialists.

Danish patients also have the ability to electronically access all of their medical information including medical records, tests results and hospital discharge instructions. They can also electronically schedule appointments and renew prescriptions, and have access to electronically enhanced, after-hours care when they need it.

In comparison to universal EHR adoption in Denmark, in the U.S., just 28% of U.S. primary-care physicians use an EHR, according to a Commonwealth Fund report last year. Meanwhile, an HHS-funded survey found that only 4% of U.S. office-based physicians used a “fully functional” EHR.

Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis said she’s had an interest in the Danish approach to IT since being invited by the Danish parliament in 1999 to join a team of outside healthcare industry experts in critiquing the Danish healthcare delivery system.

“I was very impressed by their primary-care system, the fact that they rated highest of any country in Europe for satisfaction,” Davis said. She said she was particularly impressed with the Danes use of technology in its off-hours primary-care health service, which operates between 4 p.m. and 8 a.m. Patient information for the off-hours service is accessed through a national health portal run by the Danish healthcare IT firm MedCom, and available since 2005.

Vastly more here (Free registration required):

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20100317/NEWS/303179990

The two paragraphs in italics say it all – and both the documents linked in the text are well worth a download and careful review.

Of course besides the obvious payoffs there are the less obvious ones.

Here is an example.

CSC wins Danish adverse incidents deal

19 Mar 2010

CSC has signed a major contract with the Danish National Board of Health to provide a national adverse incident system to allow patients and professionals to report adverse events encountered across the entire health service.

The contract, which was signed following an EU tender, will replace the current patient safety reporting system which only covers patient safety reporting across secondary care.

The web based system, will allow citizens, patients and healthcare professionals across primary and secondary care to enter information into the system in order to report problems they experience within the Danish health service.

Freddy Lykke, managing director of CSC Scandinavia, told E-Health Europe: “Everyone that is providing care and receiving care is providing this information, which enables it to be entered by one and then checked and cross checked by a number of others.

“So, if a patient received the wrong medicine and reported this, then the pharmacist who gave them their medication would also provide input to the system.”

The system called Risk Monitor Pro, has been developed by CSC’s partners rL solutions, who already provide the system to more than 600 clients worldwide.

However, Denmark’s National Board of Health will be the first European customer to go-live with the system in the summer.

The software also supports the examination of reported information that is reported within the system, which is then monitored and reviewed at locally, regional and at a national level.

It includes simple statistical reporting and automatic generation of different types of reports, such as types, locations and time periods when specific events occurred.

More here:

http://ehealtheurope.net/news/5750/csc_wins_danish_adverse_incidents_deal

Only when you have the basics in place can you start doing the really high impact, high value stuff!

Do note that this has all taken years and has been incrementally and carefully planned. There is a lot we can learn from all this I think.

David.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

This Blog and A History of Getting it Close To Right. We Notice Disasters Looming Pretty Well!

It is always fun to go back and look at what was happening on the blog a year or so ago and see how we are going at getting things right and wrong. Note dates of articles in bold.

I was prompted by the following to have a bit of a look round and see by this.

Timing ‘unrealistic’ for rollout of e-health patient ID scheme

16th Oct 2009

Elizabeth McIntosh

GPs face a long wait to see the promised rollout of an electronic patient identification system, an e-health expert claims, despite the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) saying that it will be in place by mid-2010.

Unique healthcare identification (UHI) numbers are a key plank of the e-health program, and are expected to improve patient safety by reliably identifying patients, providers and care facilities.

According to the recently released NEHTA strategic plan, UHI numbers will be rolled out to all stakeholders by July 2010.

However, health IT consultant Dr David More was sceptical of the 10-month time frame listed in the 46-page document, arguing it was unclear and unrealistic.

“Look at all the other [e-health initiatives] that they’ve attempted to introduce to help – even the ones that have been successful have taken years to be adopted,” Dr More said.

“2012 – that is reasonable – but pretending that 2009/10 is the year of delivery is not going to happen. They’re not going to have the majority of GPs signed up.”

More here

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/index.php/news/timing-unrealistic-for-rollout-of-ehealth-patient-id-scheme

In retrospect I suspect I was being overly optimistic.

The following is a good one:

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

The Slow Demise of Health-E-Link

It’s been another bad day for e-Health In Australia.

Today we learned that the NSW HealthConnect Trial for NSW - the Health-E-Link project is coming apart for the most basic of reasons - the lack of proper involvement and consultation of healthcare providers and consumers.

More here:

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2006/03/slow-demise-of-health-e-link.html

We are now 4 years into this trial and what has been the outcome.

The evaluation report (a summary) appeared in December, 2008 and the whole thing has been such a success it has not been expanded some 15 months later and the web site has stopped reporting additions to the data base. If ever there was a project the NSW Department of Health hopes would just go away this has to be it!

Indeed it may just have:

See here:

http://ehealthinfo.gov.au/what-is-e-health/case-studies/

We find the statement:

“At the time of its conclusion in June 2009, Healthelink electronic health records had been produced for some 45,000 people.”

Did we all miss the announcement of it being canned?

More evidence here:

https://records.healthelink.nsw.gov.au/concerto/Login.htm

Seems the certificate for the secure log in died a week ago!

While on the HealthConnect topic, it seems the Tasmanian money wasting clone has finally vanished.

The domain www.healthconnecttasmiania.net.au has just died.

This was the link:

http://www.healthconnecttasmania.net.au/index.php

As far as South Australia – also pretty dead and empty!

http://www.healthconnectsa.org.au/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx

Other than the excellent Primary Care Software developed by Pen Computing.

See here:

http://www.healthconnectsa.org.au/Default.aspx?tabid=85

I said it was mostly a waste of money and that is how this all turned out!

This was also a good one!

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Its Really Nice to Know You Were Right!

Well the chickens have come home to roost! Even allowing for a fifty percent margin of error E-Health in Australia is only moving forward very slowly and is certainly not progressing with the urgency hoped for by Minister Abbott!

The goal was set in June 2005. A report, from that time, of the Minister’s remarks is as follows:

See http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=1737192765&eid=-6787 for the full article.

Here as an extract:

“Health Minister Tony Abbott has put federal health IT bureaucrats on notice saying he expects tangible results within a year, specifically functioning electronic health records and accompanying smartcard system - or heads would start to roll.

"I am sick of trials and studies and working groups," Abbott said.

"I want patients to see a difference in 12 months. If patients do not see a difference, we will have failed," Abbot said, adding he was not prepared to be "held hostage" by a never-ending chase for the latest and greatest IT solutions.”

As we know it never happened as even worse it was the now Opposition Leader Mr Abbot who defunded the effort! I pointed this out in an article in 2005 that can be found here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/135541/academic_says_healthconnect_will_meet_abbott_timeframe/

Of course we also have this saga outlined here which more than justified scepticism of the so called “year of delivery”

http://aushealthit.blogspot.com/2009/11/this-is-really-sad-take-careful-read-of.html

Lastly:

Thursday, February 11, 2010

NEHTA Fantasises About What it Will Deliver with the HI Service.

The following lobbed today. Comments in italics in the text.

Healthcare Identifiers Bill 2010 marks e-health progress

10 February 2010.

A major step towards the implementation of a national e-health system occurred today with the introduction of the Healthcare Identifiers Bill 2010 into the House of Representatives.

The Governments Bill represents the culmination of more than a decades work in developing a framework for the introduction of e-health in Australia across different jurisdictions and with the assistance of professional bodies.

Comment: What do we think NEHTA means by the introduction of e-Health? NEHTA has been around for 5 years and what are the changes they have delivered? And what exactly is the “e-Health System” they are talking about? Would be good to see the end state that is planned so we can all decide what we think about it. Is an IEHR involved and how is this to work?

The legislation provides for the introduction of a unique identifier which will allow all Australians to have their confidential medical information transferred electronically between health providers.

End Extract of NEHTA Press Release.

Other comments in the rest of the text in the blog.

Then my comment was:

Even now there is no clear discussion as to why any single provider or software provider would adopt all this, given the cost in time and inconvenience.

I believe this project will be DOA without careful piloting and evaluation – and then modification on the basis of the findings. This assumes NEHTA will not review a range of alternatives we know exist to solve the problem without a ‘great big’ centralised ID database.

Fantastic thinking is alive and well at NEHTA if they think this can all roll out and work nationally over the next 6 months! If this is not the plan, maybe they could tell us what the plan actually is?

---- End Extract

And now we all know, if it happens at all, it will be over years, and may have an initial evaluation in 2013 when even NEHTA now admits implementation will probably not be complete by then! This detail just did not seem to quite make it into the Press Release.

Bah, humbug and spin. It seems it takes a Senate inquiry to blast away the spin and get at the truth.

Enough, I think most of us have these bureaucrats pretty much sussed. I would love to hear examples of where NEHTA’s efforts have yet been properly evaluated and found to make any real difference clinically?

Isn’t that what they are meant to exist for?

Just so I am not accused of being excessively negative I have to say that I see all this as reflecting a ‘bunker mentality’ on the part of NEHTA’s leadership group. If they would only be more open about what is going on and actually listen to those in the Health IT Community, who have a clue or two, they could be doing a vastly better job and I could stop typing.

A really good example of this is the HI Service. Who has seen the contract with Medicare Australia and actually knows what they were asked to deliver so we can know if they have done it, or not? It’s not the dollars I am interested in but rather what was to be delivered, how it was to work, how deployed and how used by the e-Health community. I don’t think we know pretty much any of that, and there is a sense out there NEHTA has been making it up as they go along.

I really feel very sad seeing so much that is just not actually delivering what is possible. How long should we persist with trying to build these national foundations before we have a really hardnosed review and make sure there is not a better way? I believe we need to work out how to get the value out of what has been done, where possible, and that really requires a strategic review of the sort undertaken by the Boston Consulting Group three years ago. This time we also need the recommendations to be actioned and not shelved.

David.

Talk About a Waste of A Bit Over an Hour!

Well, we have had the Great Health Debate.

The most interesting thing was the worm and the complete lack of genuine clarity, from both sides, as to what was planned.

There seems to be agreement as to the need for more local management of hospitals, but how this fits with and integrates with primary care, aged care and so on - no joy!

Neither side explained how they were actually going to fix the 'Blame Game' in a credible way.

The whole 75 minutes was an 'e-Health Free Zone'.

I hope we get another chance at this when both sides have their complete health plans out. What we had today was great theatre but no real substance.

The ability of these guys to simply just not answer a straightforward question just beggars belief!

David.

Monday, March 22, 2010

This Report Will be a Worry to iSoft Shareholders – Of Which I am One!

The following has just appeared in the UK Guardian newspaper on-line.

Delays with £12.7bn NHS software program bring it close to collapse

Department of Health locked in frantic talks to save Lorenzo, the IT package meant to revolutionise patient records

The government's programme to introduce software to revolutionise the way patient records are kept has lost the confidence of many NHS staff Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

The government's ailing £12.7bn IT programme to overhaul paper-based NHS patient records in England is close to imploding, potentially triggering a deluge of legal claims against the taxpayer running into billions of pounds, which could start to emerge weeks before a general election.

The Guardian has discovered that mounting chaos and delays in installing core care records systems across the country is reaching a tipping point, with intense political pressure from Whitehall now falling on Morecambe Bay NHS Trust and a software "go-live" deadline set for the end of this month.

Morecambe Bay is intended to be the first acute trust to take a new patient administration software package called Lorenzo, which has been delayed for four years. After a string of missed deadlines, the Department of Health set a deadline of March 2010 for Lorenzo last April. "If we don't see significant progress... then we will move to a new plan for delivering infomatics in healthcare," Christine Connelly, the Department of Health's director general of IT, said at the time.

Preparatory testing at Morecambe Bay is believed to have failed some weeks ago, though iSoft, the firm behind Lorenzo, last week insisted testing was "on track" and dismissed as "media speculation" suggestions that the deadline was in jeopardy.

If Lorenzo is not running smoothly at Morecambe Bay in the next two weeks it will send financial shockwaves throughout Labour's National Programme for IT, potentially forcing profits warnings from iSoft and others. It will also be devastating for the Department of Health, which is locked in frantic contract renegotiations with contractors to keep the project alive.

Lots more here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/mar/21/nhs-software-system-close-to-imploding

and also here – which provides some background.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/mar/21/nhs-national-program-problems

I find this all a bit worrying since we have had a firm denial of any major problems as recently as Friday, 19th March 2010.

Interview with iSOFT Executive Chairman & CEO Gary Cohen

Sydney – Friday, 19 March 2010 – iSOFT Group Limited (ASX: ISF) – Australia's largest listed health information

technology company, today provides the opportunity to listen to an audio broadcast with Executive Chairman & CEO

Gary Cohen in a presentation titled "iSOFT reaffirms FY10 guidance".

To listen, please copy the following details into your web browser:

www.brr.com.au/event/64877

The presentation details are as follows:

  • iSOFT reaffirms FY10 guidance - Gary Cohen, Executive Chairman & CEO
  • Presented by Gary Cohen, Executive Chairman & CEO
  • Thu, 18 Mar 2010 9:45am AEST

The release to the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) is here:

http://newsstore.fairfax.com.au/apps/previewDocument.ac?sy=smh&ss=SMH&docID=GCA01048468ISF&backTo%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fmarkets.smh.com.au%2Fapps%2Fqt%2Fquote.ac%3Fcode%3DISF%26submit%3DSearch%26securityType%3D0%26section%3Dsummary%26sortBy%3D0%26descContains%3D0

One can only hope that it is the imminent election in the UK that is flushing all this material out and that, in reality, all is going reasonably well.

The previous blog might give one some cause for pause. For the sake of my rather trivial superannuation I hope that is the case! I also happen to think it would be good if we could have an indigenous Health IT industry with one or two decent sized and successful players.

David.

An Australian E-Health Prophet Being Noticed Overseas. Is He Ignored at Home?

Last week there was a major global conference on E-Health. Links to some material will be included in the International News for this week.

It seems a keynote from Prof. Enrico Coiera, of UNSW in Sydney has stirred up some significant comment.

There is reporting here:

WoHIT keynoter warns of healthcare IT disaster

March 17, 2010 | Jack Beaudoin, VP, Content

In a sobering keynote address at the 2010 World of Health IT Conference and Exhibition, eHealth researcher Enrico Coiera of University of New South Wales, Australia said industry enthusiasts who back, uncritically, national-scale HIT systems need to prepare themselves for some very bad news.

"We've yet to experience our first health IT plane crash, a health IT failure that claims many lives," Coiera said Wednesday. "But I think that will happen... I think it's unavoidable given what we're doing. We need to do our best to mitigate that."

Coiera titled his talk "The Dangerous Decade," because while he predicts unprecedented growth in healthcare information technology in the immediate future, that proliferation will come with some unwanted side effects -- especially when deployed on a national scale.

"I think over the next 10 years we will build more health IT than we have ever built before," he said. "These systems will be bigger and more complex. The costs and benefits are so large that they will significantly impact national GDP -- people are going to notice it.

"We have no choice but to do this," Coiera continued. "The danger is that health IT is still in its infancy. We are doing things we have never done before."

To date, Coiera said, national HIT projects typically have come in two flavors: a top-down, single system implementation exemplified by England's NHS National Programme for IT; and a decentralized, bottom-up federated system best characterized the United States approach. Neither had been an unqualified success, and in fact both approaches have faced significant criticism.

.....

Given the complexity of the healthcare IT needed to address patient safety and rising costs, Coiera said there were three risks to watch: the safety of IT systems, unrealistic expectations about those systems, and addressing the wrong problem.

"We're still focused on the technology," he said. "I worry that a focus on the electronic health record dominates the thinking of most people. We are missing the easy wins," such as decision support and e-prescribing.

More here:

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/wohit-keynoter-warns-healthcare-it-disaster

There is also additional comment here:

Is there an HIT disaster waiting to happen?

By Jeff Rowe, Editor

A few months ago, we applauded ONC’s effort to prepare for the future by re-configuring its internal staff responsibilities.

But while federal HIT policymakers have been working on several fronts to anticipate and encourage greater use of HIT across the healthcare sector, a presentation delivered at the 2010 World of Health IT Conference and Exhibition leads us to wonder if ONC is also anticipating the possibility of something going terribly wrong.

In a presentation he pointedly called “The Dangerous Decade,” eHealth researcher Enrico Coiera of University of New South Wales, Australia, claimed that HIT “industry enthusiasts . . .need to prepare themselves for some very bad news.”

In his view, “we've yet to experience our first health IT plane crash, a health IT failure that claims many lives . But I think that will happen... I think it's unavoidable given what we're doing. We need to do our best to mitigate that."

We won’t bother to speculate about what a disaster might look like, but, at the very least, the recent incident at the Veterans Administration demonstrates the capacity for a single error to shut down an entire system.

.....

But there are potential downsides, as well, and when the health or lives of patients are involved, those downsides can be terribly serious.

More here:

http://ehr.healthcareitnews.com/blog/there-hit-disaster-waiting-happen

You can see the original paper here:

http://www3.chi.unsw.edu.au/pubs/Coiera%20E.%20Building%20a%20national%20health%20IT%20system%20from%20the%20middle%20out.pdf

and last week’s presentation here:

http://moreassoc.com.au/downloads/Barcelona2010-NHIT.pdf

(Prof Coiera provided the file)

In general I think he has a point but I also think that we need to be careful to avoid the ‘throwing out the baby with the bathwater problem”.

There is no doubt there have been some major projects that have struggled and which have cost a good deal more than was initially planned.

However we now are also seeing some real successes come through.

Key examples are:

Kaiser Permanente.

See here:

Kaiser Permanente Honored for Electronic Health Record Implementation

HIMSS Analytics Awards Another 12 Kaiser Permanente Hospitals Highest Recognition

OAKLAND, Calif., March 2 /PRNewswire/ -- Kaiser Permanente, the nation's leading health care provider and not-for-profit health plan, received 12 Stage 7 Awards from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. The Stage 7 Award honors hospitals that have achieved the highest level electronic health record implementation. The 12 awards were presented at the HIMSS 2010 annual conference in Atlanta, Georgia.

Kaiser Permanente is known for leadership in the use of health information technology and its groundbreaking electronic health record, Kaiser Permanente HealthConnect®. Last year, Kaiser Permanente also received 12 Stage 7 Awards, meaning that two-thirds of the system's 36 hospitals have now received these premier awards. Only 39 American hospitals have achieved this status; 24 of those are Kaiser Permanente hospitals.

More here:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kaiser-permanente-honored-for-electronic-health-record-implementation-85948822.html

Additionally Kaiser have just announced the completion of implementation of advanced systems in all their 39 or so hospitals.

Indiana Health Information Exchange

Indiana Health Info Exchange hits critical mass

By Heather B. Hayes

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Indiana Health Information Exchange (IHIE) officials have made good on a long-term goal to expand the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), its data exchange platform, to the far edges of the state’s healthcare market. At present, 62 of 114 medical facilities in Indiana have signed contracts to exchange information via the INPC, and 41 of those are now up and running.

Last week, Good Samaritan Hospital in Vincennes, Ind., became the most recent medical facility to start exchanging patient data over the INPC. The hospital, a 232-bed community health care facility, serves patients that reside in both southeastern Illinois and southwestern Indiana.

The INPC is one of the highest volume HIEs in the U.S., handling more than 2.5 million transactions a day and containing the health records of more than 10.3 million patients. It was created in 1994 by the Regenstrief Institute, an informatics and healthcare research organization in Indianapolis, but has been taken over recently by IHIE, which also offers a clinical messaging system and a quality improvement reporting initiative.

More here:

http://govhealthit.com/newsitem.aspx?nid=73318

We also need to see how a planned incremental approach has really worked in both Denmark and Holland. (More on this later in the week).

I would argue that key factors that lead to success are:

· Clinician Leadership

· Consumer Involvement with Attention to Privacy and Security Concerns and the Ability to Opt Out.

· An Incremental Phased and Planned Approach

· Really Robust Governance and Leadership

· Frequent Evaluation and Preparedness to Make Mid-Course Corrections.

· Adequate Funding

· A Bottom Up / Middle Out Style of Approach of the Right Size

· Pursuit of the Low Hanging Fruit (Clinical Messaging, Ubiquitous Basic EHR Functionality etc)

· Technologically Conservative and Proven Solution Approaches and Proper Conformance with Global Standards

· Recognition that this is a 10 year Journey.

Enrico is right to warn, in my view, that overarching top down approaches have a very bad track record.

I hope the powers that be are listening.

David.

Obama Passes Health Reform in the USA

The bills have just passed the US House of Representatives by a tiny margin 219-212.

This is all that is needed given the Democrat Majority in the Senate passed the same bill late last year.

The Bills now go the the President for signature.

This is a major step forward for the US with another 30 million now getting healthcare coverage.

Mr Rudd must be hoping he can follow suit!

David.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

The Silliest Press Release We Have Ever Seen from NEHTA.

The following was released by NEHTA a few days ago.

Australia launches leading edge e-health supply chain location directory

17 March 2010.The first electronic location directory, connecting healthcare purchasers and suppliers around Australia, was officially unveiled in Melbourne and Sydney this week. The central registry, known as GS1Locatenet GLN Directory for Healthcare, will improve the speed and accuracy of supply transactions helping to reduce hospital operating costs and save lives.

The service is the result of an ongoing partnership between the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), which built the National Product Catalogue (NPC) with support from public sector health authorities, and GS1 Australia (www.gs1au.org), a member of an international not-for-profit standards and services organisation. GS1 Australia hosts the NPC.

.....

At the launch in Melbourne on 17 March 2010, NEHTA’s Head of Strategy Andrew Howard said GS1Locatenet was a major breakthrough in the development of Australia’s national e-health system replacing current manual processes with a quicker, more accurate method of transacting with suppliers.

“Receiving the right products, at the right time and in the right location has enormous safety benefits for patients, as well as massive savings for the healthcare businesses involved,” he said.

“Every year, a number of patient deaths result from incorrect prescribing. Correct ordering and timely delivery can significantly reduce this risk.”

“The electronic system also has major benefits inside a hospital making inventory management and distribution easier and improving traceability and recall procedures for sensitive goods, such as drugs.”

ENDS

Read the full release here:

http://www.nehta.gov.au/media-centre/nehta-news/618-supply-chain

You can down load an absurdly large 3 page glossy brochure from here:

http://www.gs1au.org/assets/documents/services/locatenet/s_gs1locatenet.pdf

or you can read all about it here:

http://www.gs1au.org/services/locatenet/

Let me say the actual system sounds like a very good idea and well worth implementing as it will uniquely identify (where have we heard that lately?) locations where supplies are to be delivered from a central directory.

Of course, given it seems to cost, to the organisation for each location you allocate a GLN to, one wonders just how rapid adoption will be. I guess that is why they are free unil June 2011 so you can try before you buy!

But the last four paragraphs (and especially paragraph three) of the release are arrant nonsense and reveal either a totally brain dead Head of Strategy or much more likely a very over-excitable NEHTA Communications Person.

I am at a total loss, as I am sure you are, to work out how accurate delivery of supplies will reduce incorrect prescribing! Are inventory men and store-men prescribing these days and I was not told? This is just fantastic drivel and someone should be ‘taken out and shot’ for making such ludicrous claims. E-Health needs to be delivered on the basis of fact not absurd spin. Talk about working hard to dispose of any remaining credibility!

Can someone get NEHTA back to planet earth please?

David.

COAG Meeting Deferred Until April, 19 2010

I have just heard on the ABC the Council of Australian Governments Meeting to approve the Rudd / Roxon Plan for Health Reform will happen on April, 19 2010.

I hope we have heard about the plans for e-Health long before this date. I fear however it will not happen as we all might hope!

David.