Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

NEHTA Clinical Lead Resignations Round Up And Some Thoughts On Implications For The Future.

I had heard some rumours on this news Tuesday afternoon and these were confirmed when this came in early Wednesday  August 14, 2013:

Peter Fleming to NEHTA staff:

Dear Colleagues,
This announcement is to inform you that Dr Mukesh Haikerwal AO will soon be stepping aside from the role of National eHealth Clinical Lead and Head of Clinical Leadership and Stakeholder Management with NEHTA.
I would like to acknowledge the tremendous expertise that Dr Haikerwal has contributed to eHealth in Australia. For many years he has been a tireless advocate to turn the eHealth vision into reality, with the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record system now being well established and moving into a new phase. Dr Haikerwal will no doubt continue to advocate for the transformative ability of technology to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes for all Australians, and indeed worldwide in his role as Chair of the World Medical Association.
Over the past months, Dr Haikerwal and I have been in discussions with the Department of Health and Ageing about the way NEHTA and governments engage with healthcare providers, peak bodies, consumers, vendors and other key stakeholders who are playing a role in transforming healthcare delivery through eHealth.
This discussion aligns with NEHTA’s shift in focus from designing and building national eHealth infrastructure to implementing and supporting adoption of eHealth. As we are reaching the conclusion of these discussions, Dr Haikerwal has advised me that he sees this as the right time for him to step aside from the leadership role with NEHTA he has held for the past six years.
Mukesh brought to NEHTA the advocacy for a clinically led national eHealth programme and built a strong network of clinical leads who are experts across the entire Australian clinical landscape. This network, together with the internal Clinical Unit Mukesh developed, were successful in embedding clinical perspectives and needs into the design of NEHTA specifications which directly support the uptake of eHealth systems which are being implemented today. It is this tireless effort in the years of design which has provided a solid foundation for years to come. Mukesh will officially finish at NEHTA on 22 August.
On behalf of NEHTA, I wish Mukesh the very best in his future endeavours and look forward to continuing our dialogue on eHealth in the future.
The Executive team are meeting next Wednesday to discuss changes to NEHTA’s structure that arise from Mukesh’s departure and other recent changes. I anticipate these changes will be finalised and communicated shortly thereafter.
Regards
Peter
The first press coverage was found here:

Mukesh Haikerwal leads NEHTA exodus

  • by: Fran Foo
  • From: Australian IT
  • August 14, 2013 4:39PM
THE National E-Health Transition Authority has been rocked by the departure of top clinical lead Mukesh Haikerwal alongside other senior executives working on the e-health records project.
Sources told The Australian that several clinical leads, including Nathan Pinskier and Chris Pearce, have also resigned.
Dr Haikerwal, a former Australian Medical Association president and NEHTA's head of clinical leadership and stakeholder management, will officially leave on August 22.
He has been instrumental in promoting the benefits of the $628 million personally controlled e-health record system, especially in trying to woo doctors to adopt the platform.
Lots more here:
Next we had a good few on the next day:

Shock mass departure of NEHTA leads

15th Aug 2013
FOUR of the most senior clinical leads of the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) have quit following a massive breakdown in relations between the authority and the Department of Health and Ageing, sources confirmed today.
The shock departure included the man widely regarded as the figurehead of the personally controlled e-health record (PCEHR) former AMA president Dr Mukesh Haikerwal and clinical leads, RACGP e-health standing committee members Dr John Bennett, Dr Nathan Pinskier, as well as Dr Jenny Bartlett.
All were understood to have had contracts which expired in August. A fifth clinical lead Melbourne GP Dr Chris Pearce told MO he had quit “not even remotely disgruntled”. Rather, he made the decision to concentrate on his research.
Lots more here:
Next we had this from the AMA.

Dr Haikerwal NEHTA resignation raises serious concerns about clinical input to PCEHR

15/08/2013
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that the resignation of Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, head of clinical leadership and stakeholder management, from the National Electronic Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) raises serious concerns about clinical input to decision-making in the implementation of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).
The resignations of Dr Haikerwal, a former AMA President and NHHRC Commissioner, and other clinical leads, including Dr Nathan Pinksier, come amid reports that the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) is taking over engagement with the medical profession and IT industry over the design of the PCEHR.
Dr Hambleton said that the AMA has long advocated that the success of the PCEHR depended on how it met clinical needs.
Lots more here:
Then we also see the News Limited view:

Angry doctors quit over e-health system

  • SUE DUNLEVY
  • News Limited Network
  • August 15, 2013 10:14PM
THE government has been rocked by the mass resignation of doctors advising it on its troubled $1 billion e- health system.
The system barely functions a year after it was launched and this week former AMA president Dr Mukesh Haikerwal and Dr Nathan Pinksier and two other advisers quit in frustration.
Although 690,000 Australians have signed up for an e-health record the Department of Health has admitted only 5427 patient records have been provided by doctors.
"There is less than a 0.5 per cent chance that doctors or hospitals will find something of clinical relevance if they consult these records," Australian Medical Association chief Dr Steve Hambleton said.
"There are over 600,000 blank records which are of no use to anybody," he said.
Lots more here:
Last for the day here:

Dr Mukesh Haikerwal resigns from NEHTA Clinical Lead

Dr Mukesh Haikerwal has resigned his position as the national clinical lead for the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), and will finish the role on August 22, and NEHTA confirmed this morning that deputy clinical lead Dr Nathan Pinksier and Dr Chris Pearce have also quit.
However a spokesperson from the Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA) today confirmed that clinical engagement remains a top priority both for NEHTA and in other DOHA eHealth initiatives.
“We are continuing to work with NEHTA to revisit consultation and clinician arrangements to ensure that the Department takes a fresh look at the design of the PCEHR system and consults with those who will engage with it,” the spokesperson said today.
“The Department of Health and Ageing is taking the lead in the consultation with medical peak bodies and industry sectors, such as the new ICT Industry Consultative Forum bringing together more than 120 industry organisations next week and the PCEHR Peak Bodies Workshop next month,” the DOHA spokesperson said.  
More here:
Interestingly this was all not covered by the SMH or Age as far as I could find.
We then got official reaction from NEHTA.

Statement from Dr Mukesh Haikerwal AO

Created on Friday, 16 August 2013
On Tuesday 13 August 2013, I tendered my resignation from NEHTA effective Thursday 22 August 2013.
I have been with The National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) as National Clinical Lead since the 2007 Boston Consulting Group report.
I am a passionate advocate for health and healthcare and maintain my fervent belief that eHealth will transform the way we receive care and practice medicine. My decision to move on from my role with NEHTA has not been made lightly, and of course there is never a ‘good time’ to take this step.
However, with the eHealth system now in its current place and moving into a different phase, this is the right time for me to step aside.
More here:
and some more in depth coverage here:

Doctors quit NEHTA en masse

16 August, 2013
The top team of clinical experts behind the billion dollar e-health record system have quit en masse, leaving the Federal Government's flagship program floundering with virtually no clinical oversight.
Among the first to go was NEHTA's head of clinical leadership Dr Mukesh Haikerwal (pictured), the former AMA president, who has been the medical face of the personally controlled e-health records (PCEHRs) for the last six years.
But other key players are also understood to have quit from the executive of NEHTA's so-called "clinical unit".
These include Melbourne GP Dr Nathan Pinskier, a member RACGP's national standing committee on e-health, and Dr John Bennett.
Australian Doctor also understands that Dr Jenny Bartlett, a former executive on the Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care, has left along with Dr Chris Pearce - although the reasons behind their decision to stand down are unclear.
More here:
The comments on this post are fascinating and make it clear that there are many who are less than impressed with the whole program.
Also we have here:

Doctors ready to pull plug on eHealth

Published on Fri, 16/08/2013, 08:43:39
By Julian Bajkowski
Australia’s long and troubled efforts to create a functioning national system of electronic health and medical records system is once more close to collapse.
The Australian Medical Association has expressed serious concerns over clinician input into the project following the shock resignation of highly respected clinical representative Dr Mukesh Haikerwal from the National eHealth Transition Authority (NeHTA) this week.
Other crucial clinical advisors, including Dr Nathan Pinksier and other clinical leads are also understood to have quit signalling a severe breakdown in relations between doctors and Department of Health and Ageing.
A loss of confidence by doctors in either DoHA or or NeHTA would, in practical terms, shut-off political life support for the circa $1 billion Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) project because the scheme cannot work unless doctors voluntarily agree to use it.
The urgent warning from the AMA in the wake of the clinicians’ walk out now puts substantial pressure on DoHA’s high profile secretary, Jane Halton, to personally intervene to get the project back on-track.
More here:
And here:

 ‘Souring relations’ spurred mass quit of NEHTA leads

16th Aug 2013
THE AMA has questioned the future medical viability of the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) after the shock departure of five senior clinical advisers including the scheme’s most vocal proponent Dr Mukesh Haikerwal.
The mass resignation of National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) clinical leads this week came amid reports of souring relations between the advisors and the Department of Health and reports that the department was taking an increasingly central role in the rollout.
The other resignations were RACGP e-health standing committee members Dr John Bennett and Dr Nathan Pinskier, as well as Dr Jenny Bartlett. Melbourne GP Dr Chris Pearce also quit but he told MO his decision was because of a desire to concentrate on research.
Lots more here:
Each of these articles provides a slightly different take on what has happened - and a worth reading in full - but the conclusion seems to be that this event is something of a watershed even in the life of the PCEHR.

For the last few months Dr Haikerwal and his colleagues (along with the AMA and the RaCGP) have been saying they are not happy with the way the PCEHR was evolving and the lack of clinical involvement in the overall process. NEHTA and DoHA did respond to this to some degree but apparently the response was either too little too late, not credible or not the right response and we have then seen what we seen.

There were also concerns about the fundamental design and its ultimate suitability for purpose.

What I also find very interesting is the degree of coverage these resignations have obtained. To me either this means that the journalists see an important statement being made here or it is recognised that we are in an election campaign and that this issue might just be important and get a run - especially with all the recent Government advertising on the topic.

There is another take on what is needed from Dr Edwin Kruys found here:
http://doctorsbag.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/how-to-save-the-pcehr/
Very sensibly he has a major focus on Governance - a line I have pushed for years now!

Another point that has not been mentioned as far as I know is that the current Deloitte’s Refresh of the National E-Health Strategy now has a real opportunity to see if some worthwhile improvement can now be planned. If ever there was a time for a full review - along in my view with a full review of the PCEHR Program by the Auditor General - it is now. It seems to me that without major change the whole thing is doomed.
I am interested in knowing what others think will be the outcome going forward.
David.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

The National Press Club Health Debate Next Tuesday Might Be Fun. Looks Like E-Health Is Seriously On The Coalition Radar.

This release appeared late last week:

Labor’s $1 billion E-Health Debacle

16 August, 2013
Labor’s implementation of an e-health patient record is a $1 billion disappointment.  With nearly $1 billion spent on the program, it has failed to deliver anywhere near what the Labor Government promised.
The e-health program has been shown to be more about politics than about policy and more about spin than about outcomes for patients.
“Australian Doctor has reported that there are only 4,000 e-health records in existence.  At a cost of $1 billion that works out at $250,000 per record,” said Peter Dutton.
“This latest development proves this government is incapable of delivering on e-health.  It speaks volumes about Labor’s incompetence,” he added.
Apart from the very low take up rate, the system itself is deeply flawed.  The Government has been throwing good money after bad, spending money getting Medicare Locals to sign people up to a program that does not yet have basic clinical protocols in place, let alone support from clinicians.
“The Coalition continues to provide in-principle support for e-health, but shares the concern of many in the sector about Labor’s incompetence in managing the process,” said Mr Dutton.
The previous Coalition Government achieved significant improvements in the computerisation of general practice, from 17 per cent to over 94 per cent, by working with the profession and implementing effective policy. 
“If elected, the Coalition will assess the true status of the PCEHR implementation and again work with health professionals and the broader sector to provide real results on this important reform for patient care,” Mr Dutton said.
The e-health debacle follows a pattern of waste and incompetence from the Labor Government.  It joins the ranks of catastrophically mismanaged programs such as pink batts and school halls.
It also follows Labor’s failure to deliver on its much promised GP Super Clinics and the 16 Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centres which never materialised.
The release is found here:
There is some commentary and background here:

Coalition slams Labor’s “$1bn e-health debacle”

news Shadow Health Minister Peter Dutton has taken a pickaxe to the Federal Government’s Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) scheme, claiming the costly project was “more about spin than about outcomes for patients”.
The project was initially funded in the 2010 Federal Budget to the tune of $466.7 million after years of the health industry and technology experts calling for development and national leadership in e-health and health identifier technology to better tie together patients’ records and achieve clinical outcomes. The project is overseen by the Department of Health and Ageing in coalition with the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA).
However, last month the Government revealed it had failed to meet it initial 500,000 target for adoption of the system, with only close to 400,000 Australians using the system at that point.
At the time, University of Western Australia software academic David Glance severely criticised the scheme. “… even if the government had met the target of 500,000, it would have been a meaningless gesture,” Glance wrote at the time. “The vast majority of those who have signed up, if they ever get around to logging in, will be greeted with an empty record.”
“Given the lack of active participation on the part of GPs, as well as the lack of public hospital systems to integrate with PCEHR, there’s little evidence to suggest that this is going to change any time soon … GPs still struggle to see the benefit of spending time curating shared records when the legal liabilities are still unknown but are potentially severe.”
Just last week The Australian newspaper revealed that NEHTA had lost a number of senior executives, including clinical lead Mukesh Haikerwal.
“The question is simply: If these experienced clinicians and e-Health ‘experts’ thought the PCEHR was a winner would they be bailing out at this time?” wrote prominent Australian e-health blogger David More in response to the news. “Surely they would want to be around for the kudos and rewards that would flow from a successful program?”
“The answer is really easy. Those who are leaving know vastly more than you about the program and its risks and benefits – and yet they want out. It makes it totally clear this is a lemon on which no more time should be wasted by you or your colleagues until [The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners] and the [Australian Medical Association] are convinced – and say so and it is properly redesigned and fixed, so that the PCEHR is now both useful, safe and fit for purpose.”
More here:

Election 2013 Health Policy Debate

The Hon Tanya Plibersek MP Vs the Hon Peter Dutton MP

August 27, 2013

11.30am - 1.30pm

Here is the link:
Both Sky News and ABC News 24 typically carry these events live.
See here for example:
It will be great fun to see what is actually said on the day.
Given where the betting markets are at present on the outcome of the election I suspect what Mr Dutton has to say will be pretty important, given the press release above.
David.

Monday, August 19, 2013

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 19th August, 2013.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

There was really only on story last week with the implosion of the NEHTA Clinical Leads program and increasing clarity on the respective roles of NEHTA and DoHA in the e-Health domain.
Other blogs will consider the implications of all this and provide a round-up.
-----

Dr Haikerwal NEHTA resignation raises serious concerns about clinical input to PCEHR

15/08/2013
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that the resignation of Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, head of clinical leadership and stakeholder management, from the National Electronic Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) raises serious concerns about clinical input to decision-making in the implementation of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR).
The resignations of Dr Haikerwal, a former AMA President and NHHRC Commissioner, and other clinical leads, including Dr Nathan Pinksier, come amid reports that the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) is taking over engagement with the medical profession and IT industry over the design of the PCEHR.
Dr Hambleton said that the AMA has long advocated that the success of the PCEHR depended on how it met clinical needs.
“The PCEHR simply will not be effective if doctors – the people who patients trust most with their health care – do not have a say on what goes on the electronic medical record and how that information is accessed and used, and by whom.
-----

Mukesh Haikerwal leads NEHTA exodus

  • by: Fran Foo
  • From: Australian IT
  • August 14, 2013 4:39PM
THE National E-Health Transition Authority has been rocked by the departure of top clinical lead Mukesh Haikerwal alongside other senior executives working on the e-health records project.
Sources told The Australian that several clinical leads, including Nathan Pinskier and Chris Pearce, have also resigned.
Dr Haikerwal, a former Australian Medical Association president and NEHTA's head of clinical leadership and stakeholder management, will officially leave on August 22.
He has been instrumental in promoting the benefits of the $628 million personally controlled e-health record system, especially in trying to woo doctors to adopt the platform.
The PCEHR has had several staunch critics, including Geraldton, West Australia GP Edwin Kruys.
-----

Doctors ready to pull plug on eHealth

Published on Fri, 16/08/2013, 08:43:39
By Julian Bajkowski
Australia’s long and troubled efforts to create a functioning national system of electronic health and medical records system is once more close to collapse.
The Australian Medical Association has expressed serious concerns over clinician input into the project following the shock resignation of highly respected clinical representative Dr Mukesh Haikerwal from the National eHealth Transition Authority (NeHTA) this week.
Other crucial clinical advisors, including Dr Nathan Pinksier and other clinical leads are also understood to have quit signalling a severe breakdown in relations between doctors and Department of Health and Ageing.
-----

John Mathews: Benefits of sharing

John Mathews
Monday, 12 August, 2013
FROM at least the time of Hippocrates, the medical profession has advanced its knowledge of disease, prognosis and treatment by pooling information about patients with similar histories.
Doctors built their reputations as they acquired new knowledge and skills, helping them to attract more patients.
That “small business” model, with practitioners competing for patients, was nevertheless leavened by a cooperative commitment to share expertise through teaching and publication. Until well into the 20th century, that model was sustained — patients who could afford it would pay the doctor directly, while those who couldn’t pay would depend on the charity of a doctor or hospital, with clinical records the property of the doctor and/or the hospital.
-----

Federal departments start shedding jobs

ABC Updated August 15, 2013, 7:45 pm
Around 700 public service jobs will be axed in coming months, as the belt is tightened across two major federal departments.
The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) has told its staff that it is looking at losing 300 positions.
The Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) says 400 full-time jobs must go.
In an email to all DoHA staff, departmental secretary Jane Halton said everyone would need to work together to urgently save money.
-----

Technical Error in CDA Implementation Guides for ETP, PCEHR

Posted on August 13, 2013 by Grahame Grieve
There’s a technical error that runs through most of the CDA implementation guides that we have, including ETP, and other pcEHR related ones.
-----

Practice prods GPs to get with the e-program

13th Aug 2013
STAFF at a South Australian practice who have signed up a quarter of their patients for a PCEHR have urged other practices to get behind the system.
Practice manager Dr Sim Hee Neoh of Whyalla’s The Surgery, on the SA coast near Port Augusta, said that although the process was initially time consuming, the e-health records were proving to be a valuable resource for both staff and patients.
“We started with NEHTA about a year ago as one of 65 practices asked to participate in the PCEHR,” Dr Neoh told MO.
“It does take time, particularly with the records that have been there for a long time. They accumulate a lot of rubbish. For example, the medication list often needs to be cleansed.”
-----

It was an IT disaster: what happens now?

Date August 16, 2013

Sylvia Pennington

Shape up or ship out was the warning delivered to prime contractor IBM following the release of a Royal Commission report into Queensland Health's infamously botched SAP payroll system.
Premier Campbell Newman has announced the vendor won't be allowed to enter any new contracts with the state until it lifts its governance and contracting practices. Mr Newman has called on IBM to deal with staff adversely named in the report and asked for Crown Law and Public Service Commission advice on what action can be taken against former public servants who played key roles in the debacle. IBM has denied it is responsible for all of the disaster.
Minister for Information Technology Ian Walker will respond to the report's other recommendations when Parliament next sits. Meanwhile, chief information officers and those responsible for such high-risk, wide-ranging, multimillion-dollar technology decisions could be forgiven for wondering about the professional and personal impact of such debacles.
We take a look at four failed ICT projects where king-sized cock-ups led to courtroom consequences:
------

Smartphone device to detect faulty heart rhythms could reduce strokes

Researchers from the University of Sydney have found that a smartphone-based screening device paired with a web-based prediction facility can detect atrial fibrillation (AF) with a 97 per cent accuracy.
AF is often asymptomatic and undiagnosed and is responsible for around a third of all strokes.
The team ran a trial in ten community pharmacies using the device, the AliveCor Heart Monitor for iPhone (iECG) which uses an iPhone with special case to take a single-lead ECG reading. The trial is now continuing in a number of Sydney-based General Practices.
Researcher Nicole Lowres, whose work was funded by the Heart Foundation, says the team planned to use a handheld ECG for the project but the AliveCor device was a better option.
-----

Webinar: Embedding clinical safety in medical software implementations

Posted on August 13, 2013 by Grahame Grieve
Tomorrow I’m giving a webinar for MSIA members called “Embedding clinical safety in medical software implementations”. MSIA members can consult their MSIA releases for webinar details.
In this webinar, I’ll be looking at clinical safety from a vendor/system developer point of view
I’m going to be focusing on the real world challenges faced by people who make decisions about how systems will work. Usually this is vendor architects and analysts, but can also include developers, in-house teams, and government architecture and purchase teams.
(Now delayed until Sept)
-----
Mapping technology can assist in combatting Australia’s mental health challenges by pinpointing specific regions most in need of funding and resources, according to a geo-health expert. In light of new figures that 45 per cent of Australians aged 16-85 years will experience a common mental health-related condition, Geographic Information System (GIS) technology has emerged as a tool to determine exactly where medical services are required to address and treat the issue.
-----

Alarms may not work with NBN

Date August 13, 2013 - 9:20AM

Stuart Corner

NBN Co still doesn't know how more than a million analog-connected devices such as medical pendants and security alarms will continue to be supported when the Telstra copper network is replaced with an NBN fibre connection to homes.
There is no guarantee the telephone service provided by the NBN will provide end-to-end support for the devices. And there are no processes yet to ensure that when a retailer sells services to a customer, it is fully cognisant of any such legacy services and needs to ensure ongoing operation.
The termination boxes – the network termination device (NTD) – to be installed in all NBN-connected homes are fitted with two analog phone ports, known as Uni-V, and  four ethernet data ports, Uni-D. Any alarm services would need to be provided as ''over-the-top'' (OTT) using one of the two Uni–V ports.
-----

New Microsoft Windows 8.1 to launch on October 18

  • From: AFP
  • August 15, 2013 6:57AM
A TWEAKED version of Microsoft's Windows operating system which restores the "Start" button missed by users and updates other features will be available on October 18, the company said Wednesday.
Windows 8.1 will be offered as a free download to those already using Windows 8, and comes in response to a lukewarm reception to the operating system introduced last year aimed at serving both mobile devices and PCs.
A full retail version of Windows 8.1 will also be available on the same date.It will lauunch on October 18 in the US (October 19 AEST).
-----

Broken planet hunter Kepler telescope still on a mission

  • From: AFP
  • August 16, 2013 10:03AM
NASA says it cannot fix its hobbled planet-hunting Kepler Space Telescope and is considering what sort of scientific research it might be able to do at half-capacity.
"Today, we are reporting we do not believe we can recover three-wheeled operations, or Kepler's original science mission," said Paul Hertz, NASA Astrophysics Division director.
"So the Kepler project is turning its attention to studying the possibility of two-wheeled operations," he said, referring to the wheels the craft uses to orientate itself.
The unmanned spacecraft launched in 2009 on a search for rocky planets orbiting in the habitable zones of Sun-like stars - in other words, planets like Earth that might contain life elsewhere in the Milky Way galaxy.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Holy Moses - Is This What Comes Next For the NEHRS / PCEHR? I Sure Hope NOT!

This appeared in the UK yesterday.

Jeremy Hunt plans sale of confidential patient medical records to private firms

Confidential medical records may be offered to private companies for as little as £1, according to plans drawn up by officials.

2:20PM BST 18 Aug 2013
The new General Practice Extraction Service will consolidate NHS patient records sent to a central database by GPs around the country.
The project has been described by campaigners as an "unprecedented threat" to medical confidentiality, and doctors do not have to inform patients that their records are being passed on.
The records will include details of medical conditions and patient identifiable information including a patient's NHS number, postcode and date of birth, reports the Daily Mail.
Private firms such as Bupa are able to purchase the records for research by applying to the Health Service.
The project is being driven by NHS England but has been championed by Jeremy Hunt.
It is hoped that sharing GP records with universities and private companies could give a boost to NHS coffers as well as providing a valuable tool for medical research, monitoring flu outbreaks and screening for common diseases.
Mr Hunt also believes that providing easier access to health information will attract pharmaceutical companies and life sciences firms to the UK.
However, privacy campaigners have expressed reservations over the data sharing plans.
Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said: "The more people who have access to sensitive data, the greater the risk that it will not be protected properly. We’ve seen that on umpteen occasions in the past.
"And when there’s a financial element involved, it introduces all sorts of incentives that are not necessarily about protecting privacy."
More here:
All I can say is that both the Government and Opposition should rule this sort of information abuse out immediately.
We all know DoHA hope to mine the PCEHR information to assist managing the health system and if done with proper safeguards doing this may JUST be acceptable - not that I think it is - but the UK plan is totally over the top!

This has to be a very, very good reason never to contribute any sensitive information to the PCEHR as we all know politicians cannot be trusted not to abuse our trust.
Oh dear, oh dear.
David.

Sunday, August 18, 2013

Labor To Focus On Health This Week In The Campaign - I Wonder What The Coalition Plans?

I wonder just what the Labor Party will be saying about e-Health and the PCEHR Program in the context of a Health focus this week. ABC Radio is saying Labor will be focusing on Health after the Westmead Hospital Funding announcement today.

It would be very interesting to see just what their plans are in the e-Health area.

My fear is that they will try to skate through and not ask what the public have been given for all the money spent and will push buildings over things that might help.

As far as the Liberal / Nationals are concerned I wonder what their e-Health plans are. As far as I know there is very little in the public domain that makes their position clear.

I am sure at least the readers here might change their vote on something sensible being offered!

Please let me and all of us know what both sides are planning if you know.

Thanks

David.

To Understand Where The PCEHR Program Is Headed You Need To Ask Yourself Just One Question.

Last week we had many of the NEHTA Clinical Leads resign from the program - despite being is receipt of some significant payments for the services they were offering.
You can read about the evolving story on these links.
See here:
and here:
and  here:
and finally here:
The question is simply “If these experienced clinicians and e-Health ‘experts’ thought the PCEHR was a winner would they be bailing out at this time?
Surely they would want to be around for the kudos and rewards that would flow from a successful program?
Clearly they don’t see that happening!
Let’s keep this simple. If the clinicians who are close to the program want out just why would you want in and why?
The answer is really easy. Those who are leaving know vastly more than you about the program and its risks and benefits - and yet they want out. It makes it totally clear this is a lemon on which no more time should be wasted by you or your colleagues until the RACGP and the AMA are convinced - and say so and it is properly redesigned and fixed, so that the PCEHR is now both useful, safe and fit for purpose.
Until then stay well away as those on the inside are.
I will cover all the commentary on this in coming days but as you read the NEHTA press release keep the question above in your mind.

Statement from Dr Mukesh Haikerwal AO

Created on Friday, 16 August 2013
On Tuesday 13 August 2013, I tendered my resignation from NEHTA effective Thursday 22 August 2013.
I have been with The National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) as National Clinical Lead since the 2007 Boston Consulting Group report.
I am a passionate advocate for health and healthcare and maintain my fervent belief that eHealth will transform the way we receive care and practice medicine. My decision to move on from my role with NEHTA has not been made lightly, and of course there is never a ‘good time’ to take this step.
However, with the eHealth system now in its current place and moving into a different phase, this is the right time for me to step aside.
NEHTA’s focus has moved from designing eHealth systems to them now being tweaked to encompass utility, usability, usefulness and meaningful use in the products to be rolled out into the healthcare sector. There have been discussions with NEHTA and the Department of Health and Ageing about the best way for this to occur.
I am assured that the rigour provided to the nationwide consultation leading to the PCEHR Concept of Operations with continued engagement with healthcare providers, peak bodies, consumers, vendors and other key stakeholders which is critical, will continue.
We are just at the beginning, and there is a long way to go on the eHealth journey. I will continue to be a strong advocate for continued consultation and involvement from people using eHealth systems on the ground. I believe eHealth and the PCEHR will be the way of the future and I will continue to encourage my patients and my clinical colleagues to consider taking advantage of the benefits of these systems.
I am enormously proud of what my teams at NEHTA and the Clinical Leads group and Clinical Unit have achieved. These professionals were instrumental in making eHealth a topic of conversation in the community, in bringing together a significant agreement and vision for the use of technology in the Health sector. They have made Clinical safety a part of the “eHealth build”.
We, as a community, have a useful, usable vehicle which will make healthcare safer and more effective. I have confidence that the vision I have long believed in is achievable and that with ongoing dialogue between clinicians, the broader community, NEHTA and the governments of Australia this vision will become a reality.
On a personal and professional note, I would like to thank the marvellous stakeholders of the health sector who so willingly gave of their time, knowledge, wisdom, energies and goodwill over the six years I have been involved. I have very much enjoyed working with and learning from you, I certainly hope our paths cross again.
The statement is here:
Turn on the spin detectors as you read and ask the question I mention above.
Time will be the judge if I am right or wrong.
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 179 – Results – 18th August, 2013.

The question was:

Will The NEHRS / PCEHR Be Seen To Have Been As Problematic As The Qld Health Payroll Debacle In 2-3 Year’s Time?

Yes 46% (37)
Probably 25% (20)
Probably Not 10% (8)
No 19% (15)
I Have No Idea 1% (1)
Total votes: 81
This is a pretty clear outcome. Almost 71% believe the PCEHR is probably going to work out badly. Pity about that.
Again, many thanks to those that voted!
David.