Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Monday, May 12, 2014

Pre - Budget Review Of The Health Sector - 12th May 2014.

As we head towards the Budget in Early to Mid-May 2014 I thought It would be useful to keep a closer eye than usual on what was being said regarding what we might see coming out of the Budget.
Budget Night will be on Tuesday 13th May, 2014.
Here are some of the more interesting articles I have spotted this week. This will be the last pre-budget review and later in the week we will review the outcome
-----

General.

Overweight people could pay more for health insurance: NIB chief Mark Fitzgibbon

Date May 5, 2014 - 6:53AM

Dan Harrison

Health and Indigenous Affairs Correspondent

Overweight people could pay more for health insurance if the Abbott government adopts a Commission of Audit proposal to allow health funds to charge some customers higher premiums because of their "lifestyle choices".
Under the current system of "community rating", private health insurers are forbidden from charging older or unhealthier people more for cover.
But in its report, released on Thursday, the Commission of Audit recommended health funds be allowed to vary premiums "for a limited number of lifestyle factors, including smoking, which materially increase a person's health risk".
-----

Commission Report on Delivery of Health Services in Tasmania a Damning Indictment of Labor

A Report by the Commission on Delivery of Health Services in Tasmania has been released by Federal Health Minister Peter Dutton and Tasmanian Health Minister Michael Ferguson.
Page last updated: 05 May 2014

Joint Media Release

Federal Minister for Health
The Hon Peter Dutton MP

Tasmanian Minister for Health
The Hon Michael Ferguson MP

5 May 2014
A Report by the Commission on Delivery of Health Services in Tasmania released today by Federal Health Minister Peter Dutton and Tasmanian Health Minister Michael Ferguson reveals serious concerns about the state’s health system and the mismanagement of the Royal Hobart Hospital re-development.
The report outlines that major changes are needed to ensure the Tasmanian health system meets the needs of patients and highlights inefficient and wasteful practices.
Federal Health Minister Peter Dutton said it was clear the previous Labor and Labor-Green Governments had run the health system into the ground in Tasmania.
-----

Hockey's Commission of Audit anything but responsible

Date May 6, 2014 - 9:15AM

Peter Martin

Economics Editor, The Age

Who in their right mind would hit anyone with an effective marginal tax rate of 94 per cent?
Australia’s top personal income tax rate has never hit 80 per cent. Labor’s resource super profits tax would have been 40 per cent applied to a 28 per cent company tax rate. Labor feared that any more would take away the incentive to mine.
Yet the Commission of Audit wants to hit Australians moving from the dole back into the workforce with an effective marginal tax rate of 94 per cent on wages of $19,0000 to $32,000.
This would stall their reward from work at close to $19,000 even as they took second and third part-time jobs.
-----

Audit commission's rationalist market approach a glimpse into a less caring future

Date May 6, 2014 - 9:40PM

Ross Gittins

The Sydney Morning Herald's Economics Editor

We will hear a few toned-down echoes of the report of the National Commission of Audit in Tuesday’s budget but, apart from that, the memory of its more extraordinary proposals is already fading. And for most Coalition backbenchers, that can’t come soon enough.
But I think the audit commission has done us a great service. It has been hugely instructive. The business people and economists on the commission offered us a vision of a dystopian future.
It’s a view of what lies at the end of the road the more extreme economic rationalists are trying to lead us down. If you’ve ever wondered what life would be like if we accepted all their advice, now you know.
-----

The audit missed healthcare costs

Terry Barnes
There’s a well-worn joke about a lost traveller standing at a crossroads and asking a grizzled old Irishman for directions. “To be sure,” the Irishman replies. “I wouldn’t start from here.”
Prime Minister Tony Abbott, Treasurer Joe Hockey and Finance Minister Mathias Cormann established the National Commission of Audit to give directions on more sensible, structured and sustainable Commonwealth and federal-funded programs and services. But if the commission’s report is the starting point to a better healthcare future, like the Irishman I wouldn’t start from here either.
Overall, an unavoidable impression is that the commission, headed by then-Business Council of Australia chairman Tony Shepherd, didn’t fully grasp Australia’s complex, often economically irrational, and, above all, highly political healthcare infrastructure. Rather than do much original policy thinking, it sought largely to put its own stamp on policy debates already under way, including Medicare co-payments; widening the roles of private health insurance and health professionals other than doctors in primary care; and improving federal-state and public-private co-ordination of effort.
-----

Joe Hockey to swing axe on public sector

MORE than 200 spending programs will be slashed in next week’s federal budget as Joe Hockey vows to shrink the size of government in a “big, structural change” to save billions of dollars.
Agencies will be closed and thousands of staff retrenched over the coming months in a drastic overhaul that will start with the loss of 3000 positions in the Treasurer’s own portfolio.
The axe will fall in major portfolios including environment, transport, industry, agriculture and indigenous affairs.
Mr Hockey told The Australian that spending cuts would do the “heavy lifting” in fixing the deficit, despite growing criticism of looming tax hikes including a lift in fuel excise.
-----

Paul Keating calls for 'longevity levy' to support seniors

Date May 9, 2014 - 8:28AM

Matthew Knott

Communications and education correspondent

Former Prime Minister Paul Keating has called for a new “longevity levy” to support the growing number of Australians who will live between 80 and 100.
Mr Keating, the chief architect of compulsory superannuation, said the superannuation system had not kept pace with increased life expectancy. He said this meant a new national elderly insurance scheme – based on a levy of two to three per cent of wages – is needed to help pay for income support and aged care.
“You can't save under super for 30 years or 35 years and then live another 30 years off from it,” Mr Keating told the ABC’s Lateline program on Thursday night. “In other words, the pool can never be big enough to sustain you till your 90s. 
-----

FactCheck: does the average Australian go to the doctor 11 times a year?

8th May 2014
NO matter how you count it, on investigation Tony Shepherd’s Audit report claim doesn’t add up.
By Richard Norman, University of Technology, Sydney and Philip Haywood, University of Technology, Sydney
All Australians, on average, go to the doctor now 11 times per year. I just don’t think we’re that crook. – Tony Shepherd, Commission of Audit Chairman, press conference on the report’s launch, May 1
The National Commission of Audit’s report, released late last week, recommends a $15 co-payment for all Medicare services. It suggests this cost fall to $7.50 after a “safety net” of 15 visits or services and that concession-card holders pay $5 initially and $2.50 once they exceed the safety net.
-----

Joe Hockey waves goodbye to the Medicare Kingswood

Date May 9, 2014 - 8:36PM

Peter Hartcher

Sydney Morning Herald political and international editor

On Tuesday night, the Abbott government will announce that the free visit to the doctor for most people is to become a historical artefact of Australian life.
It will be one of the most controversial decisions that the government will take.
It will also be one of the hardest-fought as Labor and the Greens try to block it in the Senate. Clive Palmer’s party will get to sit in judgment.
Today, four out of five visits to the doctor are free to the patient because the doctor “bulk bills” the charge to Medicare.
-----

Debt Levy.

Highest earners to wear burden of levy

CABINET ministers will act within days to redraft their $10 billion “deficit tax” in a bid to ensure it would hit only the wealthiest Australians, while reserving the option of scrapping it altogether.
As more Liberals hit out at the proposal, ministers are preparing to limit the tax to those earning well above 100,000, to counter Labor accusations that the “working class” will suffer from a breach of Tony Abbott’s election promises.
One option to be decided by ministers on Wednesday is to apply a 2 per cent surcharge on incomes of more than $180,000, which is more than twice the nation’s average full-time salary.
-----

Former treasurer Peter Costello says 'debt tax' would have 'no economic benefit'

Date May 6, 2014 - 8:30AM

Judith Ireland

Breaking News Reporter

One of the most respected economic figures in the Liberal Party, former treasurer Peter Costello, has hit out against the prospect of a deficit levy, describing it as a political idea that will have no economic benefit.
This comes as Commission of Audit chief Tony Shepherd warned that if the government brings in a deficit levy, it will have to be careful about implementing the commission's report, or risk "shocking the system", and as a new poll shows support for the Coalition has dropped to its lowest level since December 2009.
As the government prepares for its final meetings on the federal budget, which will be handed down next Tuesday, the Coalition continues to face a storm of voter anger, with three polls in the past three days putting Labor clearly in front of the government.
-----

Former Coalition treasurer Peter Costello warns Tony Abbott off deficit levy

  • AAP
  • May 06, 2014 8:18AM
THE Coalition government's proposed deficit levy will have no economic benefit and is purely a political move, former treasurer Peter Costello says.
And the man who headed up a review of government spending, Tony Shepherd, has also cautioned the government against introducing the levy because it could cause a shock to the system.
Mr Costello says the levy - which would begin with a one per cent tax on those earning more than $80,000 - would not benefit the economy nor reduce interest rates.
Rather, it would detract from growth by reducing consumption. The former treasurer says the levy is a political move to gauge public reaction, and there's been enough concern for the government to shelve the idea.
-----

Deficit levy: Tony Abbott's broken promise on tax is in the national interest

Date May 7, 2014 - 9:15AM

Mark Kenny

Tony Abbott has had an epiphany on tax and now accepts he should never have promised not to increase them when in opposition. We know this because he is backing a "temporary" tax rise to accelerate the deficit deletion process.
More importantly, he recognises that not all taxes are bad and that tax policy can be used in a genuinely redistributive way – which is to say, to impose fairness. Who knew?
Bill Shorten could acknowledge this largely positive development and give the Prime Minister the leeway needed to backtrack.
Don't hold your breath on that score though.
-----

GP Co-payments.

$15 co-payment based on ‘dangerous assumption’

5th May 2014
THE National Commission of Audit’s (NCOA) proposed Medicare co-payment is based on a “very dangerous assumption” about over-servicing in the primary care system, RACGP president Dr Liz Marles has said.
The college, Consumers Health Forum and Australian College of Emergency Medicine have joined forces to oppose the plan to implement co-payments for GP visits, saying it would provide a disincentive to seek primary care, which would likely increase the need for hospitalisations and end up costing the health system more. 
A Galaxy poll, commissioned by News Corp and carried out last week, showed only 35% of Australians support a $6 co-payment, while more than half oppose it outright.
-----

GPs warn: Co-payment will be an 'administrative nightmare'

6th May 2014
THE National Commission of Audit's (NCOA) recommendation to introduce a co-payment for doctor visits and Medicare services would be an administrative nightmare for general practice, according to grassroots GPs and practice managers.
Tasmanian solo GP Dr John Wilkins told MO practices would need a sizeable float each day and a cash register; they would need to collect money, give change, write receipts, record transactions, and record bad debts and take money home, among other things.
“How do you know if someone has reached their first cap – as it includes co-payments for radiology, pathology, and other practitioners etc – and calculate the correct payment? 
-----

Abbott hints at budget co-payment

7th May 2014
PRIME Minister Tony Abbott has dropped another hint about the likelihood Australians will have to make a co-payment when visiting the doctor.
"Free services to patients are certainly not free to taxpayers," he said in a pre-budget speech.
That's being taken to mean the much flagged co-payment – possibly as much as $7.50 – is almost a certainty.
The co-payment fits neatly into Treasurer Joe Hockey's pledge to end the age of entitlement and with his "early warning bell" about the sustainability of Medicare.
-----

NCOA’s GP figures a ‘sham’: RACGP

7th May 2014
THE National Commission of Audit's assertion that there are 50,000 general practitioners in Australia has been labelled a "sham" figure by the RACGP.
The first appendix of the NCOA report says there are 50,000 Australian GPs, a number it attributes to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. 
But that number is almost 6500 higher than the most recently available ABS figures, which are from the 2011 census.
The health department's latest general practice workforce statistics, which only count GPs who have provided at least one service and had at least one claim processed in a year, give a far lower workforce headcount – 30,681 GPs for the 2012–13 financial year. 
-----

Is the evidence on GP co-payments as bad as Labor says?

May 5, 2014
Healthcare spending has been named as the nation's single largest long-term fiscal challenge by the National Commission of Audit report.
Earlier this year, Federal Health Minister Peter Dutton said the Government was considering introducing a co-payment for visits to general practitioners in the May 13 budget. This followed a speech in which he said Medicare was on an unsustainable path.
Essentially, a co-payment would mean the 80 per cent of Australians who go to bulk-billing doctors would be required to make a payment of the Government's choosing.
-----

Medicare Locals.

Local service is ‘keeping people out of hospital’

May 6, 2014, 4 a.m.
NEW England Medicare Local is stepping up the services it provides across the region, as community demand continues to increase.
Clinical services network co-ordinator Therese Greenlees told a New England Mutual business breakfast in Guyra last week that in 2012/13, the branch had recorded 10,000 mental health and 10,000 allied health service visits, a considerable increase from previous years.
Services included the likes of podiatry, physiotherapy and preventative health checks in smaller communities across the region, and mental health assessments and education and carer support.
The New England branch is one of 61 Medicare Locals across the nation, established three years ago as part of a $1.8 billion federal government scheme to help co-ordinate and deliver extra health services, including after-hours GP services, immunisation, mental health support and eHealth programs. 
-----

MPs issue health service warning

By JESSICA LONG

May 9, 2014, 6 a.m.
SOUTH Coast health-care jobs could be axed if the federal government makes any cuts to Medicare Local in next week’s budget.
Illawarra Shoalhaven Medicare Local chief executive Dianne Kitcher met with MPs last week to discuss fears the service, set up under the Rudd government, would be scrapped.
Cunningham MP Sharon Bird said the region’s diverse population meant a variety of Medicare Local services were crucial to the community.
“The government talks about them as though they’re a bunch of bureaucrats, but they’re not, they’re direct service delivery for really important preventative health initiatives,” she said.

Pharmacy.

Pharmacies in supermarkets are already here, Guild to blame: union

5 May, 2014 Christie Moffat
Proposed changes to ownership and location rules in the recent National Commission of Audit report will have limited impact, as the rise of discount pharmacy chains have created “supermarkets within pharmacies”, according to the pharmacy union.
Dr Geoff March, president of Professional Pharmacists Australia (PPA), says the “outrage” of the Pharmacy Guild of Australia over the possibility of supermarkets entering pharmacy ignores the fact that the discount approach of pharmacy chains, such as Chemist Warehouse, has already made business difficult for traditional operators to compete.
“This change in community pharmacy has happened under current ownership and location rules. The Guild has done nothing to stop the effective destruction of the community pharmacy model,” Dr March said.
------

Majority of pharmacists disagree with Audit report: poll

6 May, 2014 Christie Moffat
The majority of pharmacists disagree with the National Commission of Audit recommendations to deregulate pharmacy, according to the results of a poll on the Pharmacy News website.
The poll, launched on the Pharmacy News website last Friday, asked participants ‘Do you agree with the Audit Commission’s proposal to deregulate pharmacy?’
As of today, the majority of respondents (~70%) said they did not agree with the recommendations to deregulate pharmacy. However, 26% said they did agree with the report, and about 4% of the respondents said they were undecided.
Responding to the findings of the poll, the Pharmacy Guild of Australia said that the objective of reform should be to make improvements, not destroy a system that is working.
-----

Pharmacies call for the doctor

Pharmacies are at risk from job losses. Source: The Australian
PHARMACY insolvencies have been tipped to rise to unprecedented levels from next year, as the nation’s largest drugs wholesaler slammed a high-level review into government spending for perpetuating misconceptions about the cost of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
With industry conditions set to toughen following the introduction of accelerated price cuts for medicines in October, stockbroker Taylor Collison has estimated that about 300 pharmacies could collapse this year and next — more than 5 per cent of the country’s 5300 community phar­macies.
Last year, about 100 pharmacies were placed into receivership — including the NSW-based Harrisons Pharmacy chain — a tally higher than the previous 10 years combined.
-----

Guild apologises for claims caught in 5CPA 'administration backlog'

8 May, 2014 Chris Brooker
The Pharmacy Guild of Australia is committing extra resources to urgently address the current backlog of claims for payment for 5CPA programs: Home Medicines Reviews, Residential Medication Management Reviews, Quality Use of Medicines, and MedsCheck programs.
The Guild took over administration of the registration and claiming for these programs from 1 March this year.
Under previous claiming arrangements through the Department of Human Services, pharmacists would normally receive payment in the first week of each month for claims submitted within the first 14 days of the previous month.
-----

‘Perfect storm’ predicted to increase rate of pharmacy closures

8 May, 2014 Chris Brooker
The number of pharmacies that could go into receivership over the next two years could dramatically increase, analysts believe.
Analysis prepared by stockbrokers, Taylor Collison, indicates the next two years could see a pharmacy “market rationalisation” with around 300 pharmacies going into receivership, as reported by The Australian.
The Pharmacy Guild of Australia said previously that about 100 pharmacies went into receivership in 2011, while 2013 saw the demise of the Harrisons pharmacy group, among others.
-----

Minster backs community pharmacy model

9 May, 2014 Christie Moffat
Health Minister Peter Dutton (pictured) has reportedly reiterated the Coalition’s support for the community pharmacy model, in private discussions with the Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
The Minister’s support follows the National Commission of Audit report, released last week, which recommended the deregulation of ownership and location rules.
The report also proposed introducing pharmacies in supermarkets, prompting a swift response from the Guild, seeking assurances from the Minister.
Speaking at APP2014, Minister Dutton committed the Government to the current pharmacy model. While no public statement has been made by the Government since the Audit report was released, the Guild said it had received private assurances from the Minister.
-----
Comment:
The drumbeat suggesting a tough budget continues to build to a frenzy. The final report of the Commission of Audit (COA) has been handed to Government and released with a lot of possible impacts on health. The Budget is now being printed so all we have to do now is wait for Tuesday at 7:30pm.
We already know for certain the pension age will be 70 by 2035.
The new idea to scare the public last week is a so called  ‘debt levy’ - read income tax increase. The political fallout with this idea seems likely to be intense if the News Limited press over last weekend can be believed.
Interesting to see Community Pharmacy is really in the COA gun.
Also, interesting that the politicians of both sides are taking a double hit - salary freeze and debt levy apparently.
To remind people there is also a great deal of useful discussion here from The Conversation.
As usual - no real news on the PCEHR Review. Just a vague comment.
Thank heavens the next report will be the post-budget report.
David.

Follow Up : Looks Like Medicare Locals Are For The Chop.

This has just appeared:

Replace Medicare Locals, report

By in Local News | Tagged as: Budget14 Health
 
A review into Labor's Medicare Locals recommends they be replaced by larger regional bodies.

A federal government-commissioned review, released a day before the budget, has heightened speculation Labor's Medicare Locals system is facing the axe.

The centres are likely to be replaced by larger regional health organisations with stronger links to local hospital networks and GPs.

The review found while there were a few high-performing offices, "a great many" were not fulfilling their intended role.

Medicare Locals were meant to better co-ordinate the care of chronically ill patients in the community.

Professor John Horvath, who led the review, also found a lack of clarity about what Medicare Locals were trying to achieve.

Lots more here:


http://localtoday.com.au/get-local/local-news/134141-replace-medicare-locals-report.html

The full report is a good read - earlier blog today.

David

The Medicare Local Review Is Out. E Health Hardly Mentioned

Here are the recommendations and analysis.

3          Discussion and Recommendations

It is my considered opinion that there is a demonstrable need to reduce fragmentation and improve integration across the health care system, using clinical pathways across sectors to improve individual patient outcomes.  Our health system is generally designed for episodic care, when nowadays many illnesses are chronic and complex, requiring multiple integrated and coordinated services centred on the ongoing needs of patients.  To enable this, we need organisations that can work in partnership with the broader health system and facilitate better integration, coordination, access and care pathways.  Medicare Locals were a response to this challenge.  However, in their current form, as a national network, I do not regard them as appropriate or effective to successfully achieve these outcomes. 
There are a number of design elements that I consider essential for any organisation intended to reduce fragmentation and improve the integration of patient care across the entire health system.

3.1        Patient outcomes can be improved through better integration of health care

Many of people I spoke to as part of this Review held the view that without addressing fragmentation – both within the primary health care sector, and more broadly across the health care system – patient care will continue to be compromised and the health system investment will not be maximised.  The solution proffered is that a small number of regional entities is required to link up the parts of the health system to allow it to operate more effectively and efficiently.  Such entities must focus on improving patient outcomes through collaboratively working with health professionals and services to integrate and facilitate a seamless patient experience.  In their current form, Medicare Locals cannot fulfil this role.  They are constrained by their lack of clear purpose, variability, conflicts of interest (provider vs. purchaser) and lost goodwill with general practice.  New entities in this space must have a clearer purpose and role, and focus on being system enablers. 
I have considered what such organisations could be appropriately called.  Many ideas have been presented to me, but I keep coming back to Primary Health Organisations (PHOs).  I believe the name needs to reflect the organisations’ focus, which is the primary health care sector, as the starting point for integration, as this is the ‘shop front’ of the health care system.  Such a name should inspire professional ownership within that sector, provide a sense of place within the broader health system and be understandable for patients, carers and the broader community.  The PHO name also aligns with common international nomenclature, which would assist Australia to engage in dialogue internationally on lessons learnt.

For PHOs to be effective, it is critical that their boundaries (or rather those of their Clinical Councils and Community Advisory Committees) are aligned with LHNs, while reflecting relevant local and community needs.  This will facilitate collaborative working relationships and reduce duplication of effort.
Recommendation 1
The government should establish organisations tasked to integrate the care of patients across the entire health system in order to improve patient outcomes.
Recommendation 2
The government should consider calling these organisations Primary Health Organisations (PHOs).

3.2        General practice engagement is paramount

Any attempt to improve integration in the primary health care system requires general practice to be front and centre.  I appreciate that the original intent of Medicare Locals was to broaden the net of professional engagement within the primary health care sector, but this appears to have come at the expense of GP goodwill.  This goodwill needs to be rebuilt if any future organisation is to be successful.  Comprehensive professional engagement is still required, however it must be recognised that GPs are by their nature the first authoritative point of contact for primary health care, they start the patient on their care pathway and remain critical to their ongoing care.
To this end, I consider it essential that GPs have a significant presence within the corporate structures of any future primary health care entity.  My preference is for locally relevant Clinical Councils to be established that have a significant GP presence and broad clinical membership, including from LHNs.  These Councils would interact directly with the PHO Board.  I see these Councils as having influence in inter-sectoral collaboration, developing and monitoring integrated care pathways, and identifying solutions for service gaps.  Participation on Councils should be voluntary.  The voice and opinions of the Council will directly inform the deliberations of the PHO Board on matters such as, local and regional priorities, investment strategies, and primary health care professional and business support needs.
Recommendation 3
The government should reinforce general practice as the cornerstone of integrated primary health care, to ensure patient care is optimal. 

3.3        Vision and design principles

I put forward the following as an overview of PHOs.
Patients with chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and respiratory disease do not receive optimal care in many instances due to the fragmentation of services.  The role of the PHO is to work with GPs, private specialists, Local Hospital Networks (LHNs), private hospitals, aged care facilities, Indigenous health services, NGOs and other providers to establish clinical pathways of care that arise from the needs of patients (not organisations) that will necessarily cross over sectors to improve patient outcomes. 
The PHOs may well perform an important facilitating role in undergraduate and vocational medical and other clinical training.
Evidence shows this will reduce unplanned hospital emergency department presentations, admissions and re-admissions and patients will benefit from better health care in the community rather than having to use hospital services inappropriately.
Not all regions across Australia are equally serviced.  The role of the PHO is to work with the GPs, Commonwealth and state health authorities, LHNs, and communities to identify gaps in health services and work in partnership with these organisations to source the appropriate services.
PHOs will provide practice support to strengthen general practice to improve patient care, including assisting general practice with the adoption of electronic health records.
The success of PHOs will be known through a small number of outcome based indicators.
There are a number of design features that will facilitate the establishment of effective and efficient PHOs.  
PHOs should:
·         be companies incorporated under the Corporations Act 2001 and selected through contestable processes;
·         have skills based Boards – without restriction on membership – advised by Clinical Councils and Community Advisory Committees through mandated Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to ensure transparency and define roles and responsibilities;
·         establish a Clinical Council and a Community Advisory Committee in each LHNs (or clusters of LHNs) with which they are aligned as ‘operational units’:
o   Clinical Councils with a significant GP presence and involving primary health care professionals, public/private hospital clinicians, should be established to ensure ongoing local clinical engagement within PHOs.  Councils, aligned with LHNs provide a direct link between clinicians and the Board for effective local decision-making, particularly in terms of liaising with LHNs and developing clinical care pathways.
o   Community Advisory Committees, based on the same catchments as Clinical Councils, will provide a community voice into the Board decision-making and activities, particularly in regard to service gaps.
·         have ongoing engagement with national and local clinical bodies to ensure consistency and evidence based decision-making;
·         operate at a sufficient size to achieve benchmarked economies of scale;
·         have clear performance expectations tied into their Commonwealth contracts, with outcomes based performance indicators aligned to national and local priorities;
·         engage state and territory jurisdictions to develop structures that are most appropriate for each jurisdiction and region; and
·         engage broadly across health sectors, including public, private, and NGO sectors.
I do not see the need for a national body for PHOs.  A membership driven peak body to support the corporate needs of PHOs is best left to emerge, if required, without the investment of the Commonwealth.  There are existing national bodies, such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care that could provide PHOs with the clinical expertise, share innovations, successes and failures of PHOs.  It may be that jurisdictional PHOs see more merit in networking at a state level to leverage greater integration.  Regardless, decisions around support should be left to PHOs.

3.4        Achieving an effective and efficient PHO



Recommendation 4
The principles for the establishment of PHOs should include:
·         contestable processes for their establishment;
·         strong skills based regional Boards, each advised by a number of Clinical Councils, responsible for developing and monitoring clinical care pathways, and Community Advisory Committees;
·         flexibility of structure to reflect the differing characteristics of regions;
·         engagement with jurisdictions to develop PHO structures most appropriate for each region;
·         broad and meaningful engagement across the health sector, including public, private, Indigenous, aged care and NGO sectors; and
·         clear performance expectations.
Recommendation 5
PHOs must engage with established local and national clinical bodies.
Recommendation 6
Government should not fund a national alliance for PHOs.
 


I have identified an option that I believe should deliver the Minister improvements in patient outcomes by establishing new regional Primary Health Organisations (PHOs).  These regional PHOs would replace the existing national network of Medicare Locals and the AML Alliance. 
PHOs would be selected through a transparent competitive tender process and contracted to the Department of Health with explicit obligations and performance expectations, consistent with the vision and design principles outlined above and guided by national priorities.  Medicare Locals and other interested parties would be welcome to make a submission to operate a PHO. 
Individual PHOs would be responsible for determining appropriate organisational and operating structures consistent with the above design principles, but tailored to regional circumstances.  At the local level, Clinical Councils and Community Advisory Committees would be responsible for ensuring the PHO is accountable and relevant.  They will work to identify local health care needs and gaps in services and implement local pathways and innovative solutions to improve health outcomes.  In addition, PHOs could use out-posted staff or engage third parties (through competitive tender) to act on behalf of, and be accountable to, the PHO and support the needs of Councils and Committees.  Where feasible these arms of the PHO should be co-located within existing services (such as LHNs) to facilitate integration on the ground.
The scale of PHOs would be such that they would have significant leverage and influence within their region and more broadly within their jurisdiction to foster more equitable engagements with LHNs.  In turn this scale is designed to improve administrative efficiency by consolidating all corporate, financial and administrative functions.  These efficiencies will free up a higher proportion of funding for frontline services.
The exact number of PHOs should be decided following discussions with state and territory governments, to ensure effective alignment with LHNs and other service sectors, and careful consideration of jurisdictional regional variations.  It would be expected that most states would have at least one metropolitan and one rural PHO, with the potential for single PHO’s in Tasmania, the ACT and Northern Territory.  The end result is that there would be far fewer PHOs compared to the current network of 61 Medicare Locals.
PHOs would deliver:
·         greater local GP involvement through Clinical Councils – increasing the recognition of the central role of general practice as the cornerstone of integrated primary health care;
·         increased capacity to strengthen relationships and work collaboratively with jurisdictions and LHNs to develop patient care pathways and address gaps in service delivery;
·         effective local engagement and accountability through Community Advisory Committees and increased engagement and opportunities for the private sector, corporate general practice, across the entire aged care sector, the Indigenous community and NGOs;
·         stronger, more focused organisations that can attract highly skilled corporate and operational staff including financial and management skills; and
·         administrative efficiencies meaning more funding goes to frontline services.
Recommendation 7
The government should establish a limited number of high performing Regional PHOs whose operational units, comprising pairs of Clinical Councils and Community Advisory Committees, are aligned to LHNs.  These organisations would replace and enhance the role of Medicare Locals.

3.5        Funding and purchasing role

To maximise the return on investment in PHOs, it may be possible for the Commonwealth to provide PHOs with increased flexible and programme funding.  Opportunities exist to devolve further responsibilities from the Department of Health or other agencies to PHOs.  The advantage of this approach is two-fold, first additional funding through PHOs will increase their authority and leverage to effectively engage with the primary health care sector, LHNs and jurisdictional governments; and second, local decision-making is likely to deliver greater benefits to patients and a higher return on Commonwealth investment. 
It is important that lessons from the activities of Medicare Locals inform the establishment of PHOs, to this end I believe that the Government should review the Medicare Locals’ after hours programme to assess the appropriateness and effectiveness of the current delivery strategy.  Medicare Locals were tasked too early with this sensitive programme reform, and it resulted in many of them having to learn their purchasing/commissioning skills by experimenting on after hours GP services.
The purchasing role of PHOs will be greatly aided by deregulating the contracting platform across the Commonwealth.  There is scope to learn from the complex contractual effort deployed for Medicare Locals where programmes were increasingly devolved, each with a unique set of reporting and administrative requirements.  This complexity has had an administrative impact on the amount of resources available for frontline services.  The Department of Health’s grants management reforms has the potential to make doing business easier.  Within this context, I believe that there may be merit in further transitioning programme funding to flexible funding that requires PHOs to deliver on key performance indicators.  This would make PHOs truly responsible for local needs, allow regionalism to flourish and reduce administration drain on both sides of the contractual agreement.
PHOs, once they are fully established, would be well placed to facilitate and/or administer a range of Commonwealth funded programs, working with LHNs and other local entities to link up the system.  Teaching in such an environment would enable future practitioners to work most effectively in this future paradigm.
There is no need for PHOs to directly deliver services, except where there is demonstrable market failure, significant economies of scale, or absence of services.  The exact parameters for this definition would need to be worked out.  PHOs should be providers of last resort and their decision to directly provide services should require the approval of the Department of Health.
Recommendation 8
Government should review the current Medicare Locals’ after hours programme to determine how it can be effectively administered. 
The government should also consider how PHOs, once they are fully established, would be best able to administer a range of additional Commonwealth funded programmes.
Recommendation 9
PHOs should only provide services where there is demonstrable market failure, economies of scale, or absence of services.

3.6        Performance information and monitoring

To enable PHOs to perform effectively, reporting requirements and processes need to be streamlined, with a focus on measureable outcomes.  Aligning PHO performance reporting to LHN outcomes (such as avoidable hospitalisations and re-admissions) and national priorities will go a long way to ensure a real sense of purpose and collaboration within local health care services. 
The primary health care sector does not have access to significant data to inform decision-making.  Most of what we know about interventions in this sector is based on fee-for-service data via Medicare.  Little is known about the outcomes achieved, costs and interactions at the patient and practice level, or access trends.  There are some great examples of shared information or linked data, but these only occur in pockets and are often constrained by administrative, collaborative and/or legislative factors.  The eHealth agenda will have the potential to harness practice information resources and improve service planning thereby contributing to a more robust primary health care data set.  PHOs need to be at the forefront of enabling the eHealth agenda, supporting professional adoption needs, applying clinical pathways and demonstrating the power of information for care coordination.
Regardless, PHOs will require a repository of reliable quantitative data to inform performance judgements.  These data would be best shared through the development of interoperable systems that can extract and exchange output and outcome information.  Such a system of exchange would reduce reporting burden and allow for more efficient and effective performance monitoring.  The establishment of Medicare Locals failed to identify preferred data systems, and unfortunately many developed or purchased systems in isolation of the network and at great cost.  There is merit in identifying system preferences for PHOs to ensure that they can communicate effectively with the Department of Health via a standardised exchange portal.  It is important that the primary health care sector starts to contribute more robust data to better inform our understanding of the broader health system.
Recommendation 10
PHO performance indicators should reflect outcomes that are aligned with national priorities and contribute to a broader primary health care data strategy.

3.7        Implementation risks and strategies to deal with these

Large regional PHOs should be selected through contestable and transparent processes that support the establishment of cost effective entities.  Commonwealth funding to Medicare Locals would need to be rolled back and appropriate processes will need to be in place to minimise impacts on patient care – ensuring continuity of care for individuals. 
Although reducing the number of organisations could also be perceived as limiting or eroding local relevance and/or autonomy, particularly in high performing Medicare Local catchments where relationships with local stakeholders are well established; the goodwill of stakeholders could be effectively channeled through membership of Clinical Councils and Community Advisory Committees.  These structures would present an opportunity to capture the enthusiasm of existing Medicare Local stakeholder and advocates, and also those disenfranchised GPs who are keen to play a part in a new and invigorated organisational agenda. 
Finally, there is the potential for reform fatigue to erode positive relationships and goodwill, a PHO narrative is needed that clearly articulates the value proposition for patients, GPs, primary health care providers and the broader community.
The setting up of these PHOs will need an effective strategy to ensure all stakeholders are properly informed and involved in establishing the different parts of the PHOs relevant to their roles.  This should ensure the positive relationships and goodwill essential to their success.


4          Concluding Comments

Some Medicare Locals have achieved a great deal, however as a national network, they have failed to present a compelling argument to continue in their current form.  PHOs will build on the strengths of Medicare Locals, but by avoiding unnecessary corporate bureaucracy and duplication – a greater proportion of funding should be targeted to frontline services. 
General practice will have a key role in PHOs and, through Clinical Councils, a greater say in the governance and strategic direction of their local primary health care systems and development of integrated care pathways.  Similarly, local communities, through Community Advisory Committees, will have greater engagement to shape health services.
The future for primary health care is bright.
----- End Report.
See here for full report:
Looks like humongous change is coming.
I note little mention (3 small references) to e-Health.
Enjoy the browse.
David.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

Will The Budget Answer Two Big Questions? - The Fate Of The PCEHR and Medicare Locals.

These two are unrelated other than both being initiatives of the previous Labor Government that have been somewhat controversial.
The other e-Health element we will find out about on Tuesday will be at least an idea of what will be happening to NEHTA in the future. Note a glance at the NEHTA web site does not seem to indicate much in the way of staff replacement and hiring happening. Remember that Mr Abbott founded NEHTA as Health Minister.
On Medicare Locals this interesting article appeared on Croaky.

A Croakey #longread: Localism – a way forward

| May 11, 2014 9:49AM |
This week we will learn much about the current government’s vision for the health system through the federal budget. Amongst the revelations will be the future of Medicare Locals.  Many thanks to David Briggs, Chair of the New England Medicare Local,  for allowing us to republish his editorial on localism from the Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management.
Dr Briggs writes: 
The implementation of the national health reforms has seen the introduction of the word ‘local’ into the reform agenda. It is used in the name of State jurisdictions acute care providers and in the national primary health care framework organisations currently described as Medicare Locals. Why is this so? Why has ‘local’ become central to the language of national health reform and of the organisational structures that deliver health services across Australia?
A review of the Final Report of the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission  [1] and the subsequent National Health Reform Agreement  [2] provides limited indicators as to why ‘local’. Neither document includes an underlying philosophy or clear public policy that enshrines ‘local’ with a clear definition or implications about how the word might drive the reforms and the subsequent organisation and delivery of health services. The Final Report sets the word in the context of health system levels describing what might be done at ‘national, regional and local levels’.[1, p.8] It also talks about ‘connection ‘ and ‘integration’ and the need to ‘redesign health services around people’, [1, p.6]‘foster community participation’ [1, p.7] and to ‘foster local implementation models’. [1, p.8]
The National Health Care Agreement is more specific in intent, describing objectives in terms of acute services to ‘improve local accountability and responsiveness to the needs of communities…’ and to ‘decentralise public hospital management…’, ‘to shape local service delivery according to local needs…’, to integrate services and improve the health of local communities’. [2, p 46] According to the Agreement the strategic objective of the newly created Medicare Locals is to identify health needs of ‘local areas’ and the ‘development of locally focused and responsive services’ and in achieving this objective they are to reflect their local communities and health services in their governance arrangements’. [2, p.50]
…..
How do we put this language into practice? Perhaps in the spirit of localism and the concept of subsidiarity, Government should focus on what only it can do best. Firstly, work towards the removal of perversity in funding and payment systems, the impediments to workplace reform that all currently limit initiative and innovation. Secondly, allow generative space and incentives for providers to pool resources to meet common agendas through better use of existing resources. Thirdly, make all new program funding contestable, requiring collaborative partnerships or networks to be developed and governed locally. Fourthly, provide innovation funding for new models of governance and service delivery that substantially address identified local need. Fifthly, reduce the performance management reporting regime to manageable proportions.
It would be good to start the discussion and, perhaps debate about how we might make a real difference in the Australian healthcare system through localism by utilising a diversity of governance models at the local level that engage both communities and stakeholders.
See the original publication here.
See full article and references here:
Worth a read to see how ‘localism’ is being thought about in the Medical Local Sector.
In contrast I found on a ML web site the following information.
A position being described as Project Integration Coordinator - Partners in Recovery occupied by a university trained naturopath. Not sure what a Project Integration Co-ordinator is and why Medicare Locals would be employing naturopaths or am I just to jaded and cynical?

Addit Monday: MLs seem to be going: See here:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/b-medicare-local-set-to-be-axed/story-fni0xqrb-1226913612395
 
As far as the PCEHR is concerned it will be fascinating to see what funding is allocated and to see if there is any explanatory statement as to what any spending announced is intended to achieve.
All will become clear real soon now!
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 217 – Results – 11th May, 2014.

Here are the results of the poll.

Do You Agree With The Changes To The National Health System Recommended By The National Commission Of Audit?

You Bet - Fantastic 26%

Neutral 23%

No - Just Awful and Unfair 45%

I Have No Idea 6%

Total votes: 69

Very interesting. Good participation with a clear majority of those who have a view not liking what is recommended. Interesting close to 30% were agnostic or neutral.

Again, many thanks to all those that voted!

David.