Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Just What Are The Implications For The Health Identifier Service Of This Announcement? I Wonder How The Public Will React?

This appeared last week:

Turnbull promises national digital identity, fintech committee

Government tables long-awaited response to FSI report.

The federal government has adopted the majority of recommendations made in last year's financial systems inquiry report, promising to deliver a national federated digital identity framework and a public-private sector innovation committee for the financial sector.
In its long-awaited response to the December 2014 report, tabled today [pdf], the federal government also said it would ask the Productivity Commission to review options to improve data-sharing within the sector, and remove regulatory impediments to modern product information disclosure.
By the end of next year, the government also intends to consider how to amend priority areas of regulation to make it technology neutral.
Digital identity
The FSI report, led by David Murray, highlighted a national federated digital identity as key to improving the efficiency of digital identity processes as well as to minimise the costs and regulatory burden of customer authentication for financial services firms.
Its recommendation - accepted by the government - called for the establishment of a framework under which private and public sector bodies could compete to supply digital identities.
A single minister should be given responsibility for the framework, the report suggested, and a private-public sector taskforce should develop the detail of the framework and standards.
Banks and other financial services firms are currently required to verify an individual using government-issued, paper-based credentials such as a passport or drivers license.
By introducing a national digital identity framework, reliance on paper-based mechanisms could be reduced, making the process more secure and convenient for customers and more efficient for governments and banks, the FSI report said.
It recommended the government utilise the national document verification service, the myGov service portal, the national e-authentication framework, the Finance department’s third-party identity services assurance framework, and the government’s Vanguard electronic authentication service, among others, to create the framework.
The government today said it would task its Digital Transformation Office with developing the trusted digital identity framework.
There is also some coverage here:

Orwell returns: Government promises to implement digital ID for all

COMMENT: After being returned to office in 1987, Prime Minister Bob Hawke triumphantly announced that he now had a mandate to introduce an ID card for all Australian residents. Such was the outcry, that Hawke backed down and talk of the card disappeared into the ether. In 2015, the Orwellian Australia Card has returned in the form of a digital ID.
Buried deep in the bowels of the 32 page Government Response to Financial System Inquiry report by former Commonwealth Bank CEO David Murray, were some chilling sentences that confirmed the Government’s intentions to figuratively stamp the biblical mark of the beast’ on every Australian residents’ foreheads.
In actual fact, the ‘mark of the beast’ happens to be a national system to implement a digital identity for all individuals, which was recommended by Murray in his report.
Here are the actual words on page 20 of the document:
Digital identity.
Develop a national strategy for a federated-style model of trusted digital identities.
The Government agrees that a national digital identity strategy will help to  streamline individuals' engagement with government and provide efficiency improvements.
The Digital Transformation Office will work across government and with the private sector to develop a Trusted Digital Identity Framework to support the Government's Digital Transformation Agenda.
As is always the case with government propaganda, the words are couched in benevolent terms - ‘streamline individuals’ engagement with government’.
In actual fact, what this really means is a more convenient way for government to track and keep tabs on every single living soul residing in this country - from birth until death.
As they have in the past, proponents of the scheme may argue that if you have nothing to hide then why should you be concerned. After all, you don’t mind using your Medicare Card or Driver’s License to identify yourself.
The answer is of course that Australians are not by law required to carry either card as proof of identity or to perform transactions. In fact, we are a freedom loving people who love the freedoms that Australia has always provided and who don’t like to be presided over by authoritarian governments - especially centralised federal governments.
More here:
What is going to be very interesting is to see what the reaction to this is. Will people be thrilled or see the plan as the Australia card Mark III.
Also, if we have a digital id that we can use to move money etc. will the same id be used for health care identification for the individual?
Will be interesting to watch over the next year or so.
David.

ZDNet Article Has Now Been Retracted - With A Correction.

Here is the link:

http://www.zdnet.com/article/e-health-saving-lives-in-queensland-csiro/

Bottom paragraph now reads:

"Updated on October 28, 10.35am AEST: This article originally stated that CSIRO had made use of the government's My Health Record data, but this is not the case."

David.

ZDNet Article Seemingly Incorrect Regarding The PCEHR Health Impacts. Opt-Out Trials To Be Announced!

This appeared as a comment from Bernard Robertson-Dunn.

It is worth turning into a post.

"If anyone has seen this article:

E-health saving lives in Queensland: CSIRO

http://www.zdnet.com/article/e-health-saving-lives-in-queensland-csiro/

You would have read this claim:

"Australia's e-health record system has brought down the rate of mortality in Queensland, according to the CEO of CSIRO."

The only problem is it's a total fabrication.

I checked with the CSIRO and they said:

"we haven’t used any information from the PCEHR to date nor looked at the impact of the PCEHR on mortality in Queensland."

and

"While we have had some projects where we have used MBS and PBS data to look at the outcomes of an intervention, we haven’t used any information from the PCEHR."

It will be interesting to see if the government tries to make use of this rather misleading report and if the CSIRO issues a correction.

----- End Extract

Thanks Bernard - it really did look a bit suss. Who can imagine the Feds would be giving Qld specific data to the CSIRO in Qld., and no where else.

I wonder does this have anything to do with the Press Club speech Ms Ley is giving at 12:30pm. On Sky News if you want to watch. The ABC is reporting the PCEHR Opt-out trials will be announced for Nth Qld and the Blue Mountains!

David.

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

What Is Happening In New Zealand Looks Very Interesting. I Hope They Are Careful As It Looks Complicated.

These two articles appeared last week.

E-health records in Government's sights again after 2014 target missed

TOM PULLAR-STRECKER
Health Minister Jonathan Coleman says information technology has a 'crucial role' in making the health system more 'sustainable'.
Electronic health records are back on the Government's agenda after it missed a target of introducing them by 2014.
A government source said without electronic health records, patients could not assume healthcare providers would always have access to key clinical information about them, such as whether they were allergic to a common drug such as penicillin.
Health Minister Jonathan Coleman told a conference in Christchurch that the Government had commissioned consultants Deloitte to undertake a study into the benefits of electronic health records.
He said they would create efficiencies by "joining" up patient information held by hospitals and other healthcare providers.
Electronic health records had been the cornerstone of a National Health IT Plan agreed by the Government in 2010.
The goal then was that all Kiwis would be able to access an online record by 2014 that would contain a summary of their GP visits, specialist and hospital treatment, test results and prescriptions.
However, National Health IT Board chairman Murray Milner admitted in December 2013 that the health sector would struggle to achieve the deadline.  
Coleman did not set out a new timetable for electronic health records in his speech to the Health Informatics conference in Christchurch.
However, he said the Government wanted to establish a "blueprint for a digital hospital" by November 2016, "where all patient information is linked up into a standard electronic medical record" and can be accessed from anywhere in the hospital.
Iain McCrae, chief executive of Orion Health, New Zealand's largest health software firm, was not able to speculate on why the 2014 target had been missed, but said electronic health records were key to the future delivery of healthcare.
More here:
There is also coverage here:

NZ announces plan for single national e-health record

Thursday, October 22, 2015 - 14:21
The New Zealand government has announced plans to build a single, national electronic health record (EHR) able to be accessed via portals and apps running on a variety of devices.
Minister of Health Dr Jonathan Coleman said a report on the benefits of an electronic health records had been commissioned from consulting firm Deloitte which found that there is growing international support for adopting a “Hybrid/Best of Suite strategy for Electronic Health Records, where a ‘single’ EHR is introduced to join up information held in a smaller number of Electronic Medical Record systems.”
The Deloitte report will be published shortly on the Ministry of Health website
In a speech to the Health Informatics New Zealand Conference held in Christchurch this week, Coleman said “As I travelled around meeting clinical leaders, patients and IT providers it became clear that our eHealth system was complicated, fragmented and not as user friendly as it could be.
More here:
Here is a link to the full speech.

Health Informatics New Zealand Conference, Christchurch



Hon Dr Jonathan Coleman
Minister of Health
20 October 2015
Speech
Health Informatics New Zealand Conference, Christchurch
Opening
Thank you for inviting me here today to open the 2015 Health Informatics New Zealand conference – the most important fixture on the health IT calendar.
It’s great to be in the South Island – the first time in 14 years the conference has been held here.
I’d like to acknowledge Liz Schoff, HiNZ chair, and David Meates, chief executive of Canterbury DHB.
Attending the HINZ conference in Auckland last year was one of my first speeches as a Minister of Health. I am pleased to be part of your conference again this year. You have chosen a highly relevant and important theme - Collaborate: Share. Solve. Achieve. Measure.
The full speech is here:
Here is the report:

Independent Review of New Zealand's Electronic Health Record Strategy


Published online: 
21 October 2015

Summary

The Minister of Health has requested an independent report on the benefits of a single electronic health record in New Zealand.
There are five key findings in the report.
  • Quality and productivity benefits are available by rationalising the systems used by secondary care facilities (eg, hospitals).
  • Creating a ‘single’ electronic health record that physically consolidates health information in one place will improve decision support and care coordination especially for complex patients with multiple long-term conditions.
  • Primary care needs to be connected real-time with the ‘single’ electronic health record.
  • Implement closed loop medicine management, as this is the area that offers the highest benefits in terms of patient safety and quality.
  • Develop consumer portal access to improve the ability to serve up information from a physical repository in real-time, through digital channels to consumers. Consumer engagement around their health and wellness is key to implementing a preventive or primary care-led strategy.
The Minister referred to this report during the Health Informatics New Zealand conference in Christchurch on 20 October 2015, where he announced a new health IT programme for 2015-2020.
Here is the link:
This report needs close reading and I look forward to comments:
I note the examples of success used are Kaiser Permanente, Denmark, Singapore and British Columbia. Australia is not even mentioned in passing - and neither is the PCEHR which clearly is not anywhere close to what is being discussed in the Deloitte Report. The five bullets above make that clear - and also note just where the consumer fits. This is a system for carers not for consumers as far as I can tell.
Must read stuff and I look forward to comments.
David.

Monday, October 26, 2015

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 26th October, 2015.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

A quieter week, with ongoing stuff happening behind the scenes.
The Senate Estimates did show us how detached the DoH is with its e-Health expectations etc.
-----

Your safety can't be guaranteed in the use of IT for healthcare

Monday 19 October 2015 5:30PM (view full episode)
When you think of medical risk you might assume that the most harm would arise from surgery or multiple x-rays.
But what if the use of IT systems was causing you more harm than any visit to the GP?
Farah Magrabi says that this area of healthcare needs to be more thoroughly researched.
She has advised governments on IT-related patient harm in the US, UK and Australia.
-----

It’s all elementary for IBM supercomputer Watson

Chris Griffith

IBM’s supercomputer Watson became famous in 2011 after it beat humans in the US quiz show Jeopardy! but we can rest assured it’s unlikely to make us redundant anytime soon. If anything, we are increasingly putting Watson’s immense powers to greater use.
Peter Haggar, an IBM master inventor and technical leader of the Watson runtime platform, says it’s unlikely Watson would become more intelligent than ­humans in the near-term.
“I know that with Watson, some people have raised that concern but I don’t know if that’s likely in our lifetime and the way we’re positioning it is as a partner, as an enhancer,” Dr Haggar told The Australian. “Is Watson going to be making decisions about my health? The answer is ‘no’.”
Dr Haggar’s involvement began after Watson’s triumph at Jeopardy!. With the super computer pushing the boundaries of natural language processing and computer science at the time, Dr Haggar’s main job was to commercialise the technology, taking it out of the realm of pure research and into IBM’s product groups.
-----

Will doctors' diagnoses be obsolete in 20 years?

Paul Smith | 16 October, 2015 | 
The diagnostic skills of doctors will be obsolete in 20 years according to a politician responsible for the UK’s National Health Service.
While the debate rages in Australia over the future of Medicare, the UK's health minister has taken the argument one-step further by suggesting that it’s the future of doctors that is at stake.
Jeremy Hunt has claimed that doctors of the future will not have to make diagnoses due to increasingly powerful diagnostic tools, and the NHS must position itself to be ready for the technology when it becomes available. 
-----

Former e-Health chief dismisses privacy concerns

16 October 2015
THERE is no foundation to concerns that automatically signing up patients to the personally controlled e-health records scheme risks breaching human rights laws, says former eHealth policy chief and ex-AMA president Dr Mukesh Haikerwal.
The Melbourne GP, formerly Chief Clinical Lead at the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), says privacy safeguards are some of the strongest elements of the existing system.
Dr Haikerwal, a harsh critic of the progress of the e-Health uptake, says the unique Health Identifier fundamentally protects individuals and their health data.
“Of all the negativity around the tragic PCEHR – and a name change doesn’t help – the changes to the laws of privacy to allow the still poorly used but excellent ‘unique Health Identifier’ are very strong and protective of the rights of all Australians, and are the most robust aspect,” he says.
-----

Hundreds could be victim of identity theft scam targeting Medicare system, estimates hears

By political reporter  Stephanie Anderson
Posted yesterday at 11:29pm
Hundreds of Australians could have had their identity stolen as part of a scam targeting the Medicare system, Senate estimates has heard.
There have been 369 cases of potential identity theft in the two years to June 2015, prompting the establishment of a police strike force to investigate whether the personal information of customers had been accessed and altered to obtain the sham payments.
No confirmation on any cases has been given by the Department of Human Services.
-----

New website empowers patients

16 October, 2015 Clare Pain 
A new website from Arthritis Australia aimed at patients aged 18-49 with inflammatory disease should be a boon to patients and doctors alike.
Professor Michelle Leech, who was not involved in the development of the website, told Rheumatology Update: ”The EMPOWERED website has only just launched, but I’ve already recommended it to many patients.”
It provides information for patients at various stages of inflammatory arthritis, with much of the content as video interviews. The site is aimed at people with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.   
Prof Leech says she has treated many young patients. “I think young people with arthritis are deeply fearful and worried that they are going to be crippled and that they are going to lose their livelihood, their function and their relationships.”
She says patients who might get arthritis in their 30s are fearful of how they will be in their 70s and imagine they will be in a wheelchair.
-----

Online medical workers change the way we see, hear and feel

A Melbourne company has combined audiology and information and communication technology in a service selling do-it-yourself hearing aids online.
The iHearYou service — offered by Blamey Saunders hears — bypasses audiology clinics, saving clients thousands of dollars, the company’s executive director, operations Peter Blamey says.
He says: “iHearYou reduces common barriers to getting hearing aids, such as cost and distance from service providers.”
Blamey and his team have made the finals of the Health category of The Australian Innovation Challenge awards with iHearYou.
-----

'No bungle' over PCEHR rebrand, declares Govt

Serkan Ozturk | 22 October, 2015 | 
Only months after its high-profile rebranding of the PCEHR, the Federal Government is denying it has been involved in another “bureaucratic bungle" over its new name.
The name of the moribund PCEHR has been changed to myHealth Record as part of a multimillion dollar attempt to breathe life into a system that most doctors do not use.
It was dubbed the myHR for short, but it turned out the acronym had already been trademarked 15 years ago by AON Hewitt, one of the world’s largest financial services firms.
Last December, the government launched legal proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia to use the letters as part of its e-health revamp.
-----
Media release
Tuesday 20 October, 2015

eHealth can deliver better health, and protect privacy

An effective national eHealth system would deliver significant benefits to patients and taxpayers and it would be concerning if solvable concerns over privacy created unnecessary hurdles to the full development of eHealth, the Consumers Health Forum says.
Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights has raised concerns about “limitations” to the right to privacy under the Government’s proposed change to an “opt out” system.  The opt out change would ensure all Australians were automatically included in national electronic patient records system unless they requested not to be part of the system.
Currently the eHealth system is based on an opt-in approach under which individuals have to take active steps to sign on to the system.  “The result has been lacklustre, with only about 10 per cent of Australians joining over the past three years ” says CHF Chief Executive Officer, Leanne Wells.
“We would be concerned if the new MyHealth Record project was weighed down over concerns with privacy of the kind raised by the Committee in such a way as to hinder progress of this long-awaited reform..
“”Patient and system benefits far outweigh privacy concerns although that is not to say that patient privacy does not need active management safeguards.  The choice to opt out of the scheme would remain available for people who have privacy concerns.
-----

App Review: Evidence-based information on tap

20 October 2015
DYNAMED is a point-of-care reference tool aimed at the primary care practitioner. Founded by a family physician, Dr Brian Alper, it is a direct competitor to the better known UpToDate. It covers more than 3200 topics and monitors more than 500 journals.
DynaMed is available online and now as an app which comes free with the online subscription. I road-tested the new DynaMed Plus app, which is an upgrade from the basic DynaMed app, which is still available.
The main page of the app has a search function which is the key to unlocking the extensive information available in the app. The search function can also be used to search for images and calculators, as well as drug information.
-----

Case study - ACT Health’s use of IHIs to reduce duplicate records

Created on Wednesday, 21 October 2015
The Healthcare Identifiers (HI) Service and National Authentication Service for Health (NASH) are key foundations of the national eHealth system.
The HI Service ensures that individuals, healthcare providers and healthcare organisations are identified consistently and securely, despite changes in demographic details over time.
NASH enables secure transfer of electronic health information and authentication of senders and receivers of information.
An issue of growing concern for jurisdictions and healthcare organisations is duplicate patient records.  A duplicate patient record occurs when a single patient is associated with more than one patient record. The ability to associate patient records to the correct patient has become increasingly complicated as healthcare organisations use multiple systems for clinical, administrative, and specialty services.
-----

Turnbull promises national digital identity, fintech committee

Government tables long-awaited response to FSI report.

The federal government has adopted the majority of recommendations made in last year's financial systems inquiry report, promising to deliver a national federated digital identity framework and a public-private sector innovation committee for the financial sector.
In its long-awaited response to the December 2014 report, tabled today [pdf], the federal government also said it would ask the Productivity Commission to review options to improve data-sharing within the sector, and remove regulatory impediments to modern product information disclosure.
By the end of next year, the government also intends to consider how to amend priority areas of regulation to make it technology neutral.
-----

Orwell returns: Government promises to implement digital ID for all

COMMENT: After being returned to office in 1987, Prime Minister Bob Hawke triumphantly announced that he now had a mandate to introduce an ID card for all Australian residents. Such was the outcry, that Hawke backed down and talk of the card disappeared into the ether. In 2015, the Orwellian Australia Card has returned in the form of a digital ID.
Buried deep in the bowels of the 32 page Government Response to Financial System Inquiry report by former Commonwealth Bank CEO David Murray, were some chilling sentences that confirmed the Government’s intentions to figuratively stamp the biblical mark of the beast’ on every Australian residents’ foreheads.
In actual fact, the ‘mark of the beast’ happens to be a national system to implement a digital identity for all individuals, which was recommended by Murray in his report.
-----

The 'uberisation' of medicine is underway

John Kron | 21 October, 2015 |
Tech experts claim healthcare is ripe for 'disruption'. And it is already happening. Australian Doctor investigates.
At his first press conference as Prime Minister that Malcolm Turnbull made his statement about "disruption".
"We cannot be defensive, we cannot future-proof ourselves," he said. "We have to recognise that the disruption that we see driven by technology, the volatility and change is our friend ... if we are agile and smart enough to take advantage of it."
This volatility has been seen everywhere — as friend and foe — in the media, in the travel business, in publishing, and even in the taxi business.
And if you have been hit by the blizzard of medical media stories with a tech theme in recent months, you'll know that now it's hitting general practice.
-----

New openEHR Whitepaper – for an open platform future

Posted on by wolandscat
Today saw the release of a new openEHR whitepaper, which provides a nice summary of open platforms thinking for e-health. From the executive summary:
The key elements of openEHR’s strategic value to future development are:
  • Technically it is a platform approach, rather than a ‘set of standards’ or monolithic specification or product;
  • It offers the most comprehensive semantic framework available in e-health, combining formal clinical modelling, terminology, and a services infrastructure;
  • It deals directly with the very difficult challenges of e-health, including semantic scalability – handling complex and constantly changing information and clinical workflows, forever;
-----

The device that stops diabetics dying in their sleep

October 21, 2015 5:39am
Sue Dunlevy News Corp Australia Network
EXCLUSIVE
DANIELLA Meads-Barlow died in her sleep in the week she was to start the HSC because she couldn’t access technology that would have managed her diabetes and saved her life.
Now her mother Donna is fighting to get a government subsidy for a $5,000 continuous blood glucose monitoring device for the 130,000 Type 1 diabetes patients at risk of dying in the same way.
“She went to bed a happy, healthy 17 year old with a blood sugar level of 12.2, which is safe to go to bed,” says Ms Meade Barlow.
“When I went to wake her at 6.30am to go to school she had passed away during the night.”
Daniella’s blood glucose level had dropped so quickly she had experienced a seizure and gone into a coma.
-----

Health Informatics New Zealand Conference, Christchurch

Tuesday, 20 October 2015, 10:18 am
Speech: New Zealand Government
Hon Dr Jonathan Coleman
Minister of Health
20 October 2015
Speech
Health Informatics New Zealand Conference, Christchurch
Opening
Thank you for inviting me here today to open the 2015 Health Informatics New Zealand conference – the most important fixture on the health IT calendar.
It’s great to be in the South Island – the first time in 14 years the conference has been held here.
I’d like to acknowledge Liz Schoff, HiNZ chair, and David Meates, chief executive of Canterbury DHB.
Attending the HINZ conference in Auckland last year was one of my first speeches as a Minister of Health. I am pleased to be part of your conference again this year. You have chosen a highly relevant and important theme - Collaborate: Share. Solve. Achieve. Measure.
-----

E-health records in Government's sights again after 2014 target missed

Health Minister Jonathan Coleman says information technology has a 'crucial role' in making the health system more 'sustainable'.
Electronic health records are back on the Government's agenda after it missed a target of introducing them by 2014.
A government source said without electronic health records, patients could not assume healthcare providers would always have access to key clinical information about them, such as whether they were allergic to a common drug such as penicillin.
Health Minister Jonathan Coleman told a conference in Christchurch that the Government had commissioned consultants Deloitte to undertake a study into the benefits of electronic health records.
-----

NZ announces plan for single national e-health record

Thursday, October 22, 2015 - 14:21
The New Zealand government has announced plans to build a single, national electronic health record (EHR) able to be accessed via portals and apps running on a variety of devices.
Minister of Health Dr Jonathan Coleman said a report on the benefits of an electronic health records had been commissioned from consulting firm Deloitte which found that there is growing international support for adopting a “Hybrid/Best of Suite strategy for Electronic Health Records, where a ‘single’ EHR is introduced to join up information held in a smaller number of Electronic Medical Record systems.”
The Deloitte report will be published shortly on the Ministry of Health website
-----

Social media usage linked to kids’ mental health

  • AAP
  • October 22, 2015 12:00AM
Children who spend more than three hours a day on social media websites are twice as likely to suffer mental health issues, according to a new study.
The websites were blamed for higher levels of emotional problems, issues with other children and hyperactivity.
A report from Britain’s Office for National Statistics found 37 per cent of children spent no time on social networking websites while 56 per cent spent up to three hours. About 8 per cent of schoolchildren spent more than three hours on sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest and Snapchat on a typical day in 2012-13.
-----

New skin to give amputees full range of touch

John Ross

Researchers have moved bionics to the next level with an electronic “skin” that could be pasted on to prosthetic limbs, giving amputees the full range of touch.
Stanford University scientists have developed an organic electronic circuit that mimics the sensory mechanisms of living skin.
The breakthrough, reported in  Science, could overcome a key ­failing of artificial limbs. Lack of tactile feedback ­limits what people can do with their prostheses.
The new technology could also remove the need for convoluted wiring as well as eliminate the traumatic phantom limb pain that afflicts about four out of five amputees.
-----

NSW government signs Microsoft for cloud services

Five state government departments will gain access to Microsoft Office 365 and the tech giant's other cloud and mobility services under the deal.
By Corinne Reichert | October 22, 2015 -- 01:19 GMT (12:19 AEDT) | Topic: Cloud
The New South Wales government has announced a cloud computing contract for an undisclosed amount with Microsoft, aimed at digitising services and improving efficiency and productivity across agencies.
The agreement, announced by the state government on Thursday morning, will see Microsoft provide cloud and mobility services including Office 365 through its local datacentres to 130,000 employees across five departments: The Department of Health; the Department of Finance, Services, and Innovation; the Department of Family and Community Services; the Department of Planning and Environment; and the Department of Justice.
According to NSW Minister for Finance, Services, and Property Dominic Perrottet, using the suite of collaborative technologies will break down agencies' silos, encouraging departmental information sharing, as well as improving efficiency.
-----
Enjoy!
David.

Sunday, October 25, 2015

I Wonder Do Consumers Know Just What Nonsense About e-Health Is Being Spoken In Their Name?

This appeared during the week:
Media release
Tuesday 20 October, 2015

 eHealth can deliver better health, and protect privacy

An effective national eHealth system would deliver significant benefits to patients and taxpayers and it would be concerning if solvable concerns over privacy created unnecessary hurdles to the full development of eHealth, the Consumers Health Forum (CHF) says.
Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights has raised concerns about “limitations” to the right to privacy under the Government’s proposed change to an “opt out” system.  The opt out change would ensure all Australians were automatically included in national electronic patient records system unless they requested not to be part of the system.
Currently the eHealth system is based on an opt-in approach under which individuals have to take active steps to sign on to the system.  “The result has been lacklustre, with only about 10 per cent of Australians joining over the past three years ” says CHF Chief Executive Officer, Leanne Wells.
“We would be concerned if the new MyHealth Record project was weighed down over concerns with privacy of the kind raised by the Committee in such a way as to hinder progress of this long-awaited reform..
“”Patient and system benefits far outweigh privacy concerns although that is not to say that patient privacy does not need active management safeguards.  The choice to opt out of the scheme would remain available for people who have privacy concerns.
“The Consumers Health Forum has strongly supported an opt out approach, with rigorous privacy and security safeguards, because we believe a population-wide eHealth system will deliver substantial advantages to patient care and a cost effective health system.
“It is remarkable that the health system so often remains blinkered by 20th Century paper-based communications.  In an era when much of everyday life is assisted by information technology, the health system which itself is so dependent on accessible, accurate and speedy information, is still often depending on insecure and inefficient faxes.
“Australia needs to move to population-wide eHealth so that everybody can benefit from fewer mistakes, less duplication of tests and scans and a vastly improved, de-identified population health information system that can reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the system and guide better treatments and consumer knowledge.
“Experience in countries like the United Kingdom and New Zealand has found that an opt-out approach has been well-received.  It’s time for Australia to move on,” Ms Well said.
The Consumers Health Forum has written to the chairman of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Mr Philip Ruddock, expressing its concerns about the report which can be found at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Human_Rights/Completed_inquiries/2015/Twenty-ninth_Report_of_the_44th_Parliament
ENDS
The release will be found at their website - when they actually put it on their site.
This is a classic example of the ‘magical thinking’ we see from non-technically sophisticated organisations who seem, for reasons that are not clear, to take the view that ‘more ehealth is good’ and less ehealth is bad!
First - take this paragraph:
“It is remarkable that the health system so often remains blinkered by 20th Century paper-based communications.  In an era when much of everyday life is assisted by information technology, the health system which itself is so dependent on accessible, accurate and speedy information, is still often depending on insecure and inefficient faxes.
I assume this means that their view is that most GPs are running their practices on paper and are not using electronic communications to and from pathology and radiology providers. That is just plain wrong for most! They just have zilch interest by and large in the flawed PCEHR
Second - take this paragraph:
“Australia needs to move to population-wide eHealth so that everybody can benefit from fewer mistakes, less duplication of tests and scans and a vastly improved, de-identified population health information system that can reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the system and guide better treatments and consumer knowledge.
All this requires GPs with even more improved quality systems - not a secondary PCEHR. Worse, of course we see the Government agenda (the CHF gets lot of government funding)  and of course what is wanted by the CHF is a huge data-base to mine.
Third the CHF would do well to investigate the fate of the care.data system in the UK. Given it was opt-out and public concerns had it deferred / shut down maybe it is not time to ‘move-on’.
Fourth just what justifies the CHF trying to just shut down discussion when even the Labor inventors of the PCEHR plan a Senate enquiry to look at the matters raised by the Committee.
There are a lot of people who have health information privacy concerns and just imagining that DoH will address the complex issues raised by the Committee to everyone’s satisfaction is fantasy - on the basis of their track record to date.
The PCEHR is a system which lacks evidence for both clinical utility, value and safety and was ill conceived. With opt-out there is also a significant risk it will become even more privacy invasive. Until clear and valid responses to all the concerns raised by the HR Committee are made available and seen to be reasonable, the evidence free assertions of the CHF are frankly just insulting.
David.

AusHealthIT Poll Number 293 – Results – 25th October, 2015.

Here are the results of the poll.

Will The Move To Opt-Out Patient Enrolment Into The PCEHR Make The System A Positive Clinical Success?

Yes 5% (6)

Undecided 1% (1)

No 92% (105)

I Have No Idea 2% (2)

Total votes: 114

As decisive a poll as we have ever seen on the little poll. Opt-Out not such a good idea!

Good to see such a great number of responses!

Again, many, many thanks to all those that voted!

David.