Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Thursday, May 18, 2017

The Macro View – Health, Financial And Political News Relevant To E-Health And The Health Sector In General.

May 18, 2017 Edition.
The Budget is now over a week old and it seems to have gone down pretty well with most apparently happy with what has been done. While still waiting to see what happens next with the banks calm has been restored on pretty much everything else.
Internationally we have North Korea at it again on the weekend and Trump still as mad as ever. (Thursday note: Sadly things have now spun out of control and as I type all sorts of awfully ominous things are happening! We seem to now have serious talk of impeachment and already a former FBI director has been installed as a Special Prosecutor. I have no idea how this will end but right now Trump is in pretty deep do-do. Markets are down and people are pretty worried so we now just have to wait till James Comey (the former FBI Director - now fired) testifies to a legion of committees next week! The outcome is not certain to say the least!
-----
Here are a few other things I have noticed.
-----

National Budget Issues.

Time to factor in some realistic pessimism

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM May 8, 2017

Adam Creighton

“Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future,” wrote Niels Bohr, a Danish physicist. That’s certainly proved true for Australian government budgeting. Every federal budget for a decade has proved wildly optimistic, pencilling in billions in tax revenues that have never materialised. And tomorrow night’s federal budget will once again prompt laser-like focus on budget outcomes that will never occur.
The Treasury will assume the fastest lift in revenues as a share of the economy for almost 20 years — “tax on steroids” according to Chris Richardson, a director of Access Economics. Company tax, for instance, is expected to bring in more as a share of the economy by 2020 than at any time since the late 1970s. Income tax collections are forecast to rise 7 per cent a year — more than double the sum of inflation and population growth — over the next three years.
Despite sluggish wage growth, anaemic inflation and a highly uncertain outlook for the global economy, the government will once again assume the economy goes gangbusters for five years in a row. And once again, it probably won’t. It is only because of these rosy forecasts the government will be able to present a return to a (tiny) surplus by 2021.
-----

Federal Budget 2017: 'Bludgers' to have payments cut

SHARRI MARKSON & KYLAR LOUSSIKIAN, The Daily Telegraph | 9th May 2017 10:50 AM Updated: 4:21 PM
BLUDGERS will face a driver style demerit system in the Federal Budget which will cut off their payments for up to a month when they lose all seven points.
Welfare recipients who take taxpayers for a ride by failing to turn up to job interviews or work-for-the-dole appointments will start losing payments when they reach four points - and when they hit seven demerit points, they will have their payment cut-off, effective immediately for four weeks.
But some welfare bludgers who commit serious offences will lose their seven points in one fell swoop.
The Turnbull Government will today announce the tough demerit system as one part of major welfare sector reform, that includes scrapping Newstart allowance, combining it with other payment categories, and rebadging it under a new name to simplify the complex system.
-----

Federal Budget 2017: Scott Morrison's fresh start budget comes with fresh pain

Michelle Grattan
Published: May 10 2017 - 6:23AM
Scott Morrison has delivered a surprisingly big taxing budget that pays for the last burial rites of the 2014 toxic Abbott legacy. The Conversation
The Medicare levy will be increased to fund the hyper-expensive NDIS and Australia's big banks are being slugged with a new tax. The public will feel some impact from the levy rise - by 0.5 to 2.5 per cent - but Treasurer Scott Morrison is selling it as extra money for an "insurance" scheme.
Morrison's insistence that the problem was not on the revenue side suddenly has become oh, so yesterday.
Ordinary people will feel little sympathy for the major banks bearing extra impost, although some of the new levy on them, raising more than $6 billion over the forward estimates, will likely flow through to customers. If the banks squeal, the government has the comeback: if we are voted out you'll get a royal commission from Labor.
-----

Budget 2017: Scott Morrison slugs banks, workers

  • The Australian
  • 9:45PM May 9, 2017

David Crowe

Scott Morrison is slapping a $8.2 billion income tax increase on workers and a new $6.2bn levy on the big five banks to help achieve a budget surplus within five years, blaming the Senate for the need to raise more revenue.
The Treasurer described the new measures as “basically a Senate tax” to change course after years of being blocked in the upper house, as the government abandons unpopular spending cuts while aiming for a surplus.
The bank levy is far greater than the industry expected and is being matched with tougher regulation, giving the government a way to counter Bill Shorten’s demands for a royal commission into the sector.
-----

Federal budget 2017: A bold, big spending, big taxing, big borrowing budget

Ross Gittins
Published: May 10 2017 - 10:38AM
Of the government's four goes so far, this is its best budget. For a budget aimed squarely at improving Malcolm Turnbull's ailing political fortunes, its economics is much better.
At long last it completes the Coalition's 180 degree turn away from its toxic first budget of 2014.
It heeds mainstream economists' advice and abandons the Coalition's misguided professed concern about a "debt and deficit crisis".
It is, however, a lot stronger on principle than practice.
-----

Federal Budget 2017: Banks have 'target on their chests'

Mathew Dunckley
Published: May 10 2017 - 9:25AM
It's all bad news for the nation's banks as the shock $6 billion levy revealed in Tuesday night's budget sinks in with market watchers.
When news of the levy leaked on Tuesday ahead of the budget, investors wiped $14 billion from the value of stocks.
Investors were already wary of the banks and the news, combined with slightly soft trading update from the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, deepened a sell-off that began on May 2 and has now sliced $30 billion from the capitalisation of the banks.
-----

Federal Budget 2017: Banks would pass on new tax to customers

Mathew Dunckley
Published: May 9 2017 - 4:13PM
A new $6 billion tax on banks tipped to be revealed in Tuesday night's budget would likely be passed straight onto customers, says a major investment bank.
The Australian Financial Review reported on Tuesday afternoon that a so-called "Tobin Tax" was set to be unveiled in the budget.
The tax would be levied on financial transactions and the prospect of its implementation helped send bank stocks into a tailspin on Tuesday as more than $13 billion was wiped off the value of the banks.
-----

Budget 2017: Surplus expected within four years

Sean Aylmer
Published: May 9 2017 - 9:34PM
  • Federal Budget 2017-18 full coverage​
Consumers are expected to spend more and the global economy is forecast to pick up pace, allowing for faster economic growth in coming years. But Australians shouldn't expect to see too much more in their pay packets, nor are prices expected to rise significantly.
Forecasts in Tuesday's federal budget show the economy is tipped to rebound from the Cyclone Debbie induced slowdown and expand at a 2.75 per cent clip next financial year, before hitting 3 per cent the following year. 
The budget is expected to be back in surplus within four years, under Treasury's forecasts, in part due to the higher Medicare levy adding $8.2 billion to the government's coffers in the three years after it's introduced. New policy measures introduced since the mid-year economic review will add $20.8 billion to revenue over the next four years.
-----

Federal budget 2017 at a glance: how it affects you and Canberra

Published: May 9 2017 - 9:08PM
  • Full federal budget coverage
ECONOMY
  • moderate economic growth: 2.75% above inflation, up from 1.75% this year
  • sluggish jobs growth: 1.5%, up from 1%
  • wages growth (2.5%) slightly higher than inflation (2.5%)
  • 2017-18 deficit of $29.4 billion; return to surplus in four years
-----

Distortionary levy not smart business

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM May 10, 2017

John Durie

The federal government’s $6.2 billion attack on the big banks represents the most blatant and inefficient tax grab in recent memory and is based simply on the fact that banks and big business are on the nose politically.
This is fundamentally bad policy in the hope of winning popular support because no one likes the banks. More to the point, it negates the ALP’s push for a banking royal commission.
The big four and Macquarie now know what it means when people talk about a social licence to do business and, in case they were wondering, they have lost theirs. Sectoral-specific tax measures are inefficient and this one raises $1.6bn a year at the cost of $650 million to the economy.
-----

Budget 2017: 'No one now is talking about paying back debt' - Peter Costello

James Massola
Published: May 10 2017 - 11:33AM
The Liberal Party's longest-serving treasurer, Peter Costello, has suggested the Turnbull government's projected budget surpluses will not be enough to pay back Australia's ballooning debt.
But he has praised Treasurer Scott Morrison's "politically smart" second budget, suggesting it had "blind-sided" Australia's five biggest banks by imposing a 0.06 percentage point levy on their liabilities, which will rake in about $6 billion over four years.
Australian Bankers Association chief executive Anna Bligh has already hit out at the levy and warned it could threaten Australia's financial stability, but it is expected the measure will pass the parliament with the support of the ALP.
-----

Federal budget 2017: No tax cuts to stop bracket creep makes Australians worse off

Nassim Khadem
Published: May 11 2017 - 12:15AM
The federal budget's failure to include any changes to personal income tax rates and thresholds will push more Australians into bracket creep, tax experts say.
Middle-income Australians will bear the brunt of those changes, but experts warn workforce participation rates could fall as result of people receiving lower take-home pay. They want the Turnbull government to commit to personal tax cuts.
The impact of bracket creep – where wage inflation pushes people into higher tax brackets – will hit those on middle incomes to worst, said PwC managing partner, financial advisory, Tom Seymour.
-----

Only the economically naive would expect banks to fix the budget

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM May 13, 2017

Judith Sloan

There are two kinds of treasurers: ones who really understand economics and business, and those who don’t.
The category into which treasurers fall is not dependent on whether they have had formal training in economics or whether they have worked in business.
But, believe me, it makes a huge difference to how they conduct themselves as the country’s chief money man (we have yet to have a female treasurer) and how they assess various policy options.
Paul Keating and Peter Cost­ello were examples of the first type of treasurer.
-----

Moody's queries budget deficit projection

  • Peter Trute
  • Australian Associated Press
  • 11:34AM May 12, 2017
Ratings agency Moody's says Australia's triple-A credit rating remains intact but has expressed doubt about the federal government's timetable for reducing the budget deficit.
Moody's said on Friday it expects that government revenues will rise more slowly than projections in Tuesday's federal budget, while spending will be higher than forecast.
The agency said it expected government debt to rise to slightly above 40 per cent of GDP within three years - from around 36 per cent in 2014/15 - but that such a debt burden "would be in line with that of other Aaa-rated sovereigns".
-----

Federal budget 2017: Coalition gives up, embraces high taxes and big spending ... until the next crisis

Simon Cowan
Published: May 13 2017 - 12:15AM
Whatever the public response to the 2017 budget, it won't be a policy victory for the government. Surrender to the special interest groups – and the bleating of the revenue-istas that tax rises are the only "fair" answer – will have long-term ramifications. In fact, the 2017 budget resembles nothing so much as the Coalition reaching the final of Kübler-Ross's five stages of grief over Australia's parlous fiscal position.
The main reason the budget is important is the discipline it imposes on government. The budget requires the government to commit the details of its proposals to paper; to come up with a cost and a bottom line. Whatever nonsense politicians belt on with for the rest of the year, at budget time we get to see what they really believe in and are actually going to do.
For some time, it's been clear that Australia has a structural deficit problem. The government correctly identified that it is not, and has never been, a revenue problem. The fall in revenue after the global financial crisis just exposed the truth that permanent increases in health, education and welfare spending had been financed by a temporary mining boom (and then by debt).
-----
And For Fun:

Bipartisan consensus defies everything we thought we knew about Australian politics

Annabel Crabb
Published: May 13 2017 - 12:36PM
There's a very funny song about redheads written by the Australian performer Tim Minchin that goes "Only a ginger can call another ginger 'Ginger'."
And it started running through my head with hysterical insistence as soon as I cracked open the 2017 budget speech and registered – pupils dilating with incredulity – that the Turnbull government was seriously proposing to slot the banking sector with a $6 billion tax.
Maybe only a banker, like Malcolm Turnbull, can tax another banker to such a cartoonish degree and keep a straight face.
-----

Health Budget Issues.

Budget focus on affordable health care and medicines

Renee Viellaris, The Sunday Mail (Qld)
May 7, 2017 12:00am
THE Turnbull Government will use Tuesday’s Budget to unveil substantial measures to drive down the price of healthcare.
Treasurer Scott Morrison will announce a cost-of-living Budget that in part will focus on cheaper medicines and visits to doctors.
Health Minister Greg Hunt, who grew up with a mother who struggled with mental illness, is also expected to unveil a significant package for those affected by mental illness.
Highly placed sources also emphasised the significance of infrastructure in the Budget, with a bagful of cash for the long-touted Melbourne-to-Brisbane inland rail, which would be a massive coup for farmers exporting their produce.
-----
9 May 2017 - 8:57pm

Budget 2017: How will health services be affected?

The government says it will increase Medicare rebates and cut the cost of medicines.
By James-Elton Pym
9 May 2017 - 7:57 PM  UPDATED YESTERDAY 8:57 PM
Here's how the health system fared from Budget 2017:

Rebates and drugs 

A new Medicare Guarantee Fund is to be established from the 1st of July, 2017 to secure the ongoing funding of the Medicare Benefits Schedule and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
The fund will receive income from the Medicare levy - after the NDIS funding is deducted – and topped up by personal tax receipts.
This Budget restores indexation of the Medicare rebate, starting with GP and diagnostic imaging bulk-billing incentives from the 1st of July.
At the same time, the Medicare levy low-income thresholds for singles, families and seniors and pensioners will be increased so that low-income taxpayers generally continue to be exempted from paying the Medicare levy.
-----

Budget 2017: PBS shake-up to cut cost of drugs

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM May 10, 2017

Sean Parnell

Price reforms in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme will deliver $1.8 billion in savings over five years, which the Turnbull government will reinvest in drug subsidies and pharmacy initiatives.
Under an agreement with Medicines Australia, the government will mandate bigger price cuts, and for longer — drugs listed on the PBS for more than 10 years will be especially targeted — and embrace cheaper alternatives. This will enable new drugs to be listed on the PBS, including Sacubitril with Valsartan (product name Entresto), for patients with chronic heart failure, at a cost of $514.6 million.
Health Minister Greg Hunt has struck similar agreements with the Pharmacy Guild — community pharmacies will benefit from ­funded medication management reviews and other initiatives — and the Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association.
-----
  • Updated May 9 2017 at 11:00 PM

Hunter Medical Research Institute leads search for $30b in health savings

One-fifth of Australia's $160 billion annual health budget could be saved by better technology assessment at the hospital and primary care level, and a Novacastrian research foundation has developed a model to deliver it.
While government scrutiny of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and Medicare Benefits Schedule had reduced waste, little attention had been paid to inefficient procedures at the general practitioner and hospital level, according to the head economist at Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Andrew Searles.
"We spend 40 per cent of the total federal and state healthcare budget in hospitals, and 38 per cent in primary care, yet remarkably little has been done to identify low-value healthcare and invest the savings into high-value healthcare in these sectors," said Mr Searles.
-----
  • Updated May 9 2017 at 6:32 PM

Budget 2017: Health deal provides unprecedented level of political cover

Budget 2017: Find out where the money is going
A week ago, Health Minister Greg Hunt finally received the signed letters giving him the green light to proceed with the Turnbull government's $10 billion health package.
The heads of the Australian Medical Association, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Pharmacy Guild, Medicines Australia, and the Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association congratulated Hunt on their "shared vision".
For the first time, a health minister had written confirmation from the health industry's loudest and most powerful voices that they approved of a massive overhaul of the taxpayer funding of their sector.
No matter what theatrics Labor might pull in question time after Tuesday's budget, the five-party agreement gives the government an unprecedented level of political cover.
-----

Federal Budget 2017: Medicare rebates to increase as part of $10 billion healthcare package

Staff reporter
Published: May 9 2017 - 8:28PM
Patients will have to pull less money out of their own pockets for a trip to the doctor when the government increases Medicare rebates as part of a $10 billion healthcare package at the heart of the 2017 federal budget.
Treasurer Scott Morrison appeared determined to snuff out any remaining doubt about the Coalition's intentions on Medicare, after Labor's "Mediscare" campaign during last year's election.
"Tonight, we put to rest any doubts about Medicare and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme," he said in his budget speech, before announcing a "$10 billion re-investment in Australia's health care over four years".
-----

Pharmacy wins a budget boost

Good outcome for the sector, although many measures were already in train

Pharmacy groups are applauding the Federal government and Health Minister Greg Hunt for delivering a good Budget for the profession.
Measures to solve the ongoing risk share impasse and deliver on 6CPA professional service program promises are highlights of a Budget that was more relevant to pharmacy than many in recent years.
-----

Federal budget 2017: Increase in Medicare levy to fund gap in National Disability Insurance Scheme

Staff reporter
Published: May 9 2017 - 7:49PM
The Medicare levy will rise to 2.5 per cent from July 2019, raising  $7.8 billion over two years in an effort to plug a "funding gap" that turned the National Disability Insurance Scheme into a political football earlier this year.
Raising the levy by 0.5 percentage points for all taxpayers, from 2 per cent of taxable income to 2.5 per cent, is expected to raise $3.55 billion in 2019-2020, and another $4.25 billion the following year. The government says this will ensure the NDIS can become fully operational by 2020.
Treasurer Scott Morrison said funding the NDIS, which will support about 460,000 people at a cost of $21 billion a year once it is fully operational, fell on the shoulders of all Australians.
-----

Damage done to health already, Labor says

May 10, 20179:46am
Simone Ziaziaris Australian Associated Press
Labor has dismissed the health profession's backing for federal government budget measures, saying doctors and specialists would have welcomed anything that "left them alone for a while".
The indexation freeze on Medicare rebates - a huge sticking point for doctors - will be lifted in stages over the next four years at a cost of $1 billion to federal coffers.
Australian Medical Association president Michael Gannon welcomed the move, but also said it was overdue.
"We acknowledge that the three-stage process will provide GPs and other specialists with certainty and security...and will help address rising out-of-pocket costs for patients," he said.
-----

Why the Budget leaves general practice out in the cold

| 10 May, 2017 |  
No government will put money into general practice unless bulk-billing rates collapse.
This is the key principle that should be applied when looking through the debris of last night’s budget.
There is no immediate respite from the continued cuts to patient rebates for GP care.
What has emerged — contrary to the brave self-declarations of victory from the RACGP — is not an end to the specialty's woes.
-----

Budget 2017: Greg Hunt promises more health reform

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM May 11, 2017

Sean Parnell

Health insurance costs, workforce distribution and mental health services are next on the reform agenda for Health Minister Greg Hunt after the federal government used the budget to mend ­relations with the sector.
The key measures of ending the Medicare freeze, cutting the cost of pharmaceuticals and reinvesting in new drug subsidies have generally been well-received by health groups, who were rocked by the slash-and-burn approach of the Coalition’s 2014 budget and contentious policy initiatives.
Mr Hunt also signed “compacts” with the Australian Medical Association, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Medicines Australia, Pharmacy Guild and the Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association.
-----

Primary, Sonic rise as budget measures propel medical sector

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM May 11, 2017

Sarah-Jane Tasker

The Turnbull government’s ongoing battle with the healthcare sector appears over, for now, with Tuesday’s budget neutralising funding and reform concerns.
The ceasefire saw listed healthcare stocks enjoy a bounce on the local market yesterday as investors digested the news that Scott Morrison’s second budget was light on negative surprises for the sector.
Shares in Primary Health Care were almost 2 per cent higher at $3.82 yesterday, while Sonic Healthcare was up 1.2 per cent at $23.24 and Healthscope added 1.8 per cent to $2.24.
-----

Senate inquiry adds pressure to medical device industry

  • The Australian
  • 10:43AM May 12, 2017

Sarah-Jane Tasker

Health Minister Greg Hunt’s push on the medical device industry has been boosted by a senate inquiry calling for greater transparency on the significant gap in prices paid between the public and private systems.
A senate inquiry into price regulation associated with the Prostheses List, which sets the cost health insurers must pay for a device, has delivered the government 16 recommendations to reform the process.
The community affairs reference committee said it noted that stakeholders identified several areas in the Prostheses List framework that would benefit from reform.
-----

Why you could have to pay $1 more for medicine

Sue Dunlevy, National Health Reporter, News Corp Australia Network
May 13, 2017 12:00am
Subscriber only
HEALTH Minister Greg Hunt has changed his script - and the change is about to hit your hip pocket.
The cost of prescription medicine could rise by $1 per script as a result of Mr Hunt reaching an agreement with the Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
Mr Hunt has confirmed to News Corp he will review a policy that allows pharmacists to discount the $6.30 and $38.80 prices consumers have to pay for subsidised prescription medicines.
-----

Health Insurance Issues.

Budget 2017: private health insurers fear ‘breach of faith’ on tax break

  • The Australian
  • 12:00AM May 8, 2017

Joe Kelly

Health insurance chiefs and economists are urging the government not to extend the Medicare Levy surcharge to those with private coverage in tomorrow’s budget, arguing it would be a “breach of faith” and would force more people into the public system.
With the government expected to lift its freeze on the Medicare rebate for GP visits, Scott Morrison yesterday brushed aside questions on whether he would unveil new taxation measures targeting high-income earners to buttress health spending and counter Labor’s 2016 “Mediscare” campaign.
The Treasurer flagged further health announcements would be held back for budget night in an interview with veteran political journalist Laurie Oakes while West Australian Liberal senator Linda Reynolds told Sky News she was “confident” there would be “very significant” health announcements tomorrow.
-----

International Commentary.

Donald Trump and the US backflip on China

Tom Switzer
Published: May 8 2017 - 12:15AM
Many Australians were furious about Donald Trump's election last November. To put it mildly and politely, he is incapable of understatement. He is strikingly ignorant of the world. He is also an impulsive and unpredictable character. Not surprisingly, critics warned his strident anti-China rhetoric could drag us into an unnecessary war with our largest trade partner.  
However, although it is still very early days, these doubters have been proved wrong about the new president's ability to deal with Beijing. Having once fumed about Xi Jinping, Trump now calls the Chinese leader a "very good man". Having once promised a 45 per cent tariff hike on Chinese imports, he is rapidly abandoning talk that Beijing is a currency manipulator.
The power of Trump's U-turn and reverse gear is up to best international standards. But it's his volte face on the South China Sea that really surprises. And it has received no coverage in the Australian media.
-----
I look forward to comments on all this!
-----
David.

A Useful Summary, For The Layman, On Upcoming Health Data Breach Law Implementation.

This appeared a few days ago:

How will Australia’s mandatory data breach notification law affect health service providers

Australia May 10 2017
The apparent privacy breach illustrates the potential harm to reputation of health service providers and underscores the need to improve information handling practices in order to minimise the need to comply with the mandatory data breach obligation.
This article briefly summarises the incident at the John Fawkner Privacy Hospital and explains, in general detail, the obligations health services providers assume when the mandatory data breach notification obligations begin to apply.
Between now and 22 February 2018 (when the data breach notification obligations take effect, according to the Privacy Commissioner), health service providers should:
  • Review their privacy policies and internal data handling procedures to ensure that they are up to date, accurate and comprehensive;
  • Review arrangements with suppliers to ensure that suppliers are maintaining the privacy of personal information disclosed to the supplier by health service providers;
  • Train staff on the importance of privacy, including how to spot a potential data breach; and
  • Formulate a plan to implement in the event a data breach is detected.
What happened at the John Fawkner Private Hospital?
According to a report, a collection of patient records were inadvertently left in a public street near the John Fawkner Private Hospital. The information included patient names, diagnoses, treatment plans, medications, living arrangements and other highly sensitive information.
The hospital operator, Healthscope, is not obliged to inform patients of the apparent privacy breach. The Privacy Commissioner and the Health Services Commissioner both confirmed that they would investigate the circumstances of the apparent privacy breach.
Healthscope, declined to confirm whether it would contact the patients to inform them that their personal and health information had been lost.
What happens when the mandatory data breach notification law comes into effect?
When the notification obligation takes effect, health service providers must report a data breach to the Privacy Commissioner and to affected individuals if the breach is likely to result in serious harm to any individual affected by the breach (as determined on an objective basis).
The following factors are relevant to determining whether the breach is likely to result in serious harm:
  • the kind(s) of information;
  • the sensitivity of the information;
  • whether security measures protect the information;
  • the likelihood that such measures can be defeated;
  • the person(s), or kind(s) of person(s) who have obtained or who could obtain access to the information; and
  • the nature of the harm.
When personal information collected and held by a health services provider is inadvertently released, the chances are quite high that such information is highly sensitive and that the information is not protected by sophisticated security measures. For example, in the case of John Fawkner Private Hospital, the information was recorded in hand-over notes.
Are there exceptions to the obligation?
There are several exceptions to the reporting obligation. If the health services provider takes remedial action to prevent the serious harm from occurring, then the provider is not obliged to report the data breach to the Commissioner or to affected individuals.
Whether the provider has taken remedial action is judged objectively, as the test is whether a reasonable person would conclude that the breach is unlikely to result in serious harm to any affected individual. The legislation is vague on the nature and extent of the remedial action.
If the action taken removes the risk of being seriously harmed for some but not all affected individuals, then the provider must still notify the Commissioner and the affected individuals, but the obligation is reduced to exclude an obligation to notify those individuals protected by the remedial action.
Additionally, an unauthorised access, unauthorised disclosure or loss of personal information cannot give rise to an eligible data breach if that access, disclosure or loss has been, or is required to be, notified under the mandatory data breach notification requirement in the My Health Records Act 2012 (Cth).
More here:
Well worth reading if you have any accountability for protecting and maintaining health information. As always, in any uncertainty exists, seek professional advice!
David.

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

The Medical Republic and Jeremy Knibbs Are On A Roll As Far As The myHR Is Concerned.

This appeared late last week:
12 May 2017

MyHR might now be ‘the mother of all red tape’

Posted by Jeremy Knibbs
In the ABC satire Utopia, the head of department asks a consultant to do an “independent review” of a recent project. The consultant asks: “What do you want the findings to be?”
The government-commissioned report by the Siggins Miller consultancy on the My Health Record trials is life imitating art. Here are 10 reasons why this report feels a lot like it is what the Department of Health wanted it to be.

1. A compulsory MyHR?

So far, not one key stakeholder has bought into the MyHR in a meaningful manner, except, of course, for the government itself. Not patients, not healthcare professionals, not key service providers such as software vendors or private pathology.
So, after $1.5 billion and counting, what is the government’s answer to this dilemma? Make it compulsory? Sorry.
What if the system and the concept are (or always have been) fundamentally flawed? There are lots of reasons to suggest that the MyHR idea, certainly in its original grand form, has had its time.
Several technologies are reinventing the concept of a flexible electronic health record from the ground up. More agile, more accurate and timely patient record systems have started via private providers, and they look like they will do a lot of the job the MyHR was originally designed to do.
Yet here we are considering making the system compulsory and tying all points of data in our health system to it. Without understanding its utlity in our rapidly evolving digital ecosystem  better such a move risks creating ‘the mother of all red tape’. We are at the point of bribing doctors to use it via ePIP, and they still don’t engage in it meaningfully.
Do we really think the standover regulatory path will make it work? We’ve had to pay GP-patient management software vendors to write to it, because they didn’t see any use in it.
The major private pathology providers won’t touch it because they see no benefit. Patients don’t care about it, which is why we’ve decided we need to opt them in, understanding full well that their apathy will work in our favour once it’s opt out.
The argument from the DoH seems to go that the reason no one is engaging so far is because the system needs a critical mass of data. Maybe. But if no one is engaging – patients, doctors and service providers – wouldn’t you be a bit cautious about simply ‘enforcing’ the use of the system?
Read the other 9 points here:
I have to say it is really good to see that there are others who have scepticism regarding the myHR.
I look forward to continued analysis that highlights just how many warts there are on this awful myHR program!
David.

The DoH Really Must Be Desperate To Have GPs Use A System Of Unproven Value.

This appeared a little while ago.

RACGP chief defends budget pact with govt

| 16 May, 2017 |  
The RACGP is denying bungling the numbers as it defends its controversial budget pact with the Federal Government.
Under the “compact”, unveiled on the night of the budget, the RACGP gives the government the green light to wait until July 2018 to lift the freeze on Medicare rebates for GP consultations.
Under the deal, the rebates will rise based on an old indexation formula.
However, the formula, which will lift a level B consult by around 55 cents, has long been criticised by doctor groups for being below the actual rate of CPI (see box below).
Despite this, RACGP president Dr Bastian Seidel has defended the agreement, describing it as a major win and arguing that it represents an “ongoing guarantee of the same funding each year in real terms”.
“While this [guarantee] may seem like a step back to where we were before the big freeze, it’s a clear win for over 85% of Australians who receive preventative health services from their GPs each and every year,” Dr Seidel said in a media statement on Tuesday morning.
“Our agreement with the Australian Government to help strengthen Medicare recognises the essential role of GPs in a system that touches every Australian.”
A college spokesperson said this afternoon that "real terms" meant increases in line with wages and inflation, "not inflation alone which is higher or medical inflation which is higher still".
The AMA made a similar deal with the government, without agreeing to how rebates will be indexed once the freeze is lifted.
But AMA vice president Dr Tony Bartone said: “If funding is less than CPI, then, by definition, it is not in real terms.”
On Monday, former AMA secretary general Dr Bill Cootes warned it would add to the already heavy financial pressures on practices.
Lots more here:
Just amazing that because of  a pittance of an increase in fees the College thinks that they can deliver to a desperate Department of Health more utilization of the myHR (part of the deal is that the College will promote the myHR) that GPs have already largely rejected.
If the system was any good none of this would be needed and we would not need ePIP and the like. Doesn’t the Department realise the myHR is already an obsolete, use-hostile, time wasting dud?
Remember before you can assess and financial benefits from the myHR for the Government you have to deduct all these, apparently endless, incentive costs – which must have been a fair bit by now. Anyone know the figures?
This really just goes round and round with incentives to foster use of a system which I reckon will go back to little use as soon as the payments cease. The lesson from the past has been that GPs only stick with things that help – not things that involve lots of time and effort.
Time will tell I guess! Looking from the outside this myHR is really costing a bundle!
David.

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Here Is A Salutary Tale For Those Who Are Confident In The Privacy And Security Of The myHR.

This appeared a few days ago.

Former job centre worker charged with illegally accessing ex-lover's phone number

Shannon Tonkin
Published: May 13 2017 - 10:52AM
A former job centre employee upset her co-worker had ended their extra-marital affair is accused of illegally accessing his new mobile phone number in order to harass and threaten him
Brooke Holmes, who now runs F45 Training at Shellharbour, is accused of repeatedly ringing the man after he ended their 12-month relationship in 2014 and threatening to divulge their affair to her husband.
Ms Holmes also allegedly phoned the man's new girlfriend, telling her they were still sleeping together and that he was the father of her unborn child.
Documents presented to Wollongong Local Court on Friday said Ms Holmes was working for ORS Group at the time in a role that gave her access to the restricted Employee Services System, which contained personal information including addresses and contact details for job seekers.
The court heard Holmes and the victim, who also worked for ORS Group, had an affair between mid-2013 and mid-2014. He left the company in February 2015, saying he was forced to repeatedly change his mobile phone number to avoid calls from Ms Holmes.
He told police he only disclosed the new numbers to a few people and organisations, including his job service provider, MBC Employment Solutions. 
More here:
As every security specialist will tell you the weakest link in all these systems is the people with access to privileged information.
I wonder how many staff are involved in the myHR, have pretty complete access to the system and have some family ructions going on at any one time? I am sure the number is not zero!
A word to the wise – keep your private health information to your self – as this blogger advises.

Govt's electronic health record plan is a data breach waiting to happen

And you should opt out of it as soon as you can, freelancer Asher Wolf writes.
I love me my internets. Love ’em. Datalove, cyber-hippies, instant-data-transfers, crowdsourced decision-making, OpenGov, making shiny cyber-societies of transhuman wealth and immortality, and all that shit. Share your selfies, encrypt your hearts! Etc, etc, etc.
But every so often in the government’s search for INNOVATION! and CYBER! a shitty proposal rears its head that’s so utterly noxious that I feel the need to wave my wooden spoon around: Bad government! Bad!
As some of you may have noticed, the 2017 federal budget contains a proposal to roll-out e-health to all Australian citizens.
Let me just pop on my mask and robe and take the form of prophetess of digital doom for a moment …
We know the Australian government has one of the worst records of data breaches in the world. So naturally, rather than addressing their incompetencies, the Australian government has decided to roll out an e-health record for every Australian citizen. And it’s opt-out only.
Yes, you heard right. The Australian government plans to create an e-health profile for every Australian citizen and upload sensitive health data for inter-departmental sharing via the internet.
(Side note: My Health Record, the name of the scheme in question, was formerly known as the PCEHR, but it’s been renamed because everyone pretty much hated on the PCEHR, and the government thought they’d better rebrand before attempting to roll it out again.)
Of course, unlike everyone else, the Australian government thinks their e-health framework is a great idea, because if ignorance were bliss, they’d be the happiest bunch of pricks on Earth.
There’s absolutely no way this e-health proposal could go wrong, right? Centralising all sensitive data, placing it in the hands of government … because this government would never share the confidential data of a private citizen who threatens their stance, like, say when Minister for Human Services Alan Tudge released the Centrelink data of Andie Fox last month when she criticised faulty data-matching robo-debts?
Yes sir-eee, what could go wrong?
Lots more here:
Now don’t say you have not been warned!
David.