Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Monday, June 22, 2009

Ever Wonder What Happened to the Founding CEO of NEHTA?

The following arrived in my inbox today to clear up any uncertainty.

From today’s Slattery’s Watch we have the following:

Government 2.0 Taskforce announced

Lindsay Tanner, Minister for Finance and Deregulation has formed a Government 2.0 Taskforce to be chaired by Dr Nicholas Gruen. Other members of the fifteen member taskforce include: Ann Steward, Alan Noble, Martin Hoffman, Mia Garlick, Ian Reinecke, Prof Brian Fitzgerald, Lisa Harvey and Pip Marlow.

The work of the Taskforce is divided into promoting transparency and encouraging engagement. The Taskforce will be able to fund initiatives and incentives through a Project Fund of $2.45 million to support the development of Web 2.0 tools and applications that either enable engagement between government and the community or support the innovative use of government information.

The Taskforce will also identify policies and frameworks to assist the Information Commissioner and other agencies in - developing and managing a whole of government information publication scheme to encourage greater disclosure of public sector information; extending opportunities for the reuse of government information and encouraging effective online innovation, consultation and engagement by government.

The full newsletter can be viewed here:

http://www.rippledirect.com.au/Virtemail.cfm?H=2482b14xn83

The taskforce has a web site with video introduction here:

http://gov2.net.au/

There is more coverage here:

Govt unleashes web 2.0 taskforce

Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet.com.au

22 June 2009 02:33 PM

Tags: government, web 2.0, tanner, gruen, taskforce, steward, noble

The Federal Government today launched a taskforce to investigate web 2.0's ability to make government more transparent and increase community engagement.

A video introduction to the taskforce (Credit: Federal Govt)

The taskforce will table a report at the end of this year on how government information can become more accessible and usable, how the government can make use of the views, resources and knowledge of the public, and how to promote collaboration across agencies. After the report the taskforce will disband.

Comments on the taskforce abounded this morning in Twitter under the tag #publicsphere from people participating in Senator Kate Lundy's Public Sphere open government event in Canberra. Many tweets were supportive, pointing out sites where web 2.0 has worked which the government could examine, while others were concerned about the taskforce's commitment to open standards and innovation given Microsoft's involvement.

The taskforce will be chaired by Dr Nicholas Gruen, CEO of Lateral Economics. It also features some prominent members including Australian Government CIO Ann Steward as deputy chair, Google Australia engineering director Alan Noble, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations CIO Glenn Archer, assistant secretary for the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy Mia Garlick, Microsoft public sector director Pip Marlow and former NEHTA CEO Dr Ian Reinecke.

Much more here:

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Govt-unleashes-web-2-0-taskforce/0,130061733,339297051,00.htm

All I can say is that it is good Dr Reinecke’s expertise in “promoting transparency and encouraging engagement” is to be fully utilised!

David.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Useful and Interesting Health IT News from the Last Week – 21/06/2009.

Again, in the last week, I have come across a few news items which are worth passing on.

First we have:

Good medicine

By Elinore Martel

June 17, 2009

Internet pharmacies offer some savings and convenience, but consumers need to be aware of the limitations.

Melbourne mother Nicki Azzopardi used to save a bundle by buying her contraceptive pills online.

But when it was time to have a family and she took maternity leave, she kept on shopping at an online pharmacy.

"When I went on maternity leave, it was very useful," she says. "Particularly in those early months, to have all my formula and nappies arrive on the front doorstep. Not having to go anywhere was priceless."

It helped that her purchases were cheaper, too. Now, she says, most of her mothers' group shop online with Pharmacy Direct. "If you do those bulk orders, you get free postage, plus the convenience of having it delivered to your front door," she says.

More Australians may be looking to online pharmacies for savings, following warnings that price rises and the economic crisis are making people less likely to take their medicine.

But are there savings to be made by shopping online?

And what other options are there to save money on pharmaceuticals?

A spokeswoman for Choice, Elise Davidson, says shoppers with a Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescription pay the same for the drug regardless of where it is bought.

The best way to save money is to buy generic drugs, she says. These are copies of branded drugs, which may differ in colour or size because of the filler or other ingredients but must contain the same active ingredient as the original.

A reason many can save money by shopping online is because it's easier to make price comparisons and find the cheapest supplier, Davidson says.

Lots more here:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/money/planning/good-medicine/2009/06/15/1244917984497.html?sssdmh=dm16.382497

This is an interesting article. It is hard to see why people with chronic diseases should not be able to shop around for the cheapest supply of genuine Australian sourced medications (under no circumstances should anything be sourced from overseas). The obstruction from community pharmacy and the Guild in trying to block consumer access to such services is really ridiculous.

Second we have:

Survey: Elderly, poor narrow broadband service gap

PETER SVENSSON

June 18, 2009 - 6:50AM

Some groups that have lagged in signing up for high-speed Internet service, like the elderly, the poor and rural residents, have started to gain on those who have had a head start, according to a new survey.

Those conclusions come as the government is set to decide how to spend $7.2 billion in stimulus money on expanding the availability of broadband.

Broadband usage among those 65 or older grew from 19 percent in May 2008 to 30 percent this April, the Pew Internet & American Life Project said Wednesday.

Among households with annual income of less than $20,000, 35 percent subscribed to broadband this year, compared with 25 percent last year. By contrast, broadband penetration for households that earn more than $75,000 per year, already well connected, remained roughly unchanged at 85 percent.

In rural America, a target for the broadband stimulus money, broadband penetration is now 46 percent, up from 38 percent.

.....

The Pew study also found that people pay less for broadband where there is competition. The average was $44.70 per month for those with only one available provider, compared with $38.30 for others.

© 2009 AP DIGITAL
This story is sourced direct from an overseas news agency as an additional service to readers. Spelling follows North American usage, along with foreign currency and measurement units.

More here:

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-technology/survey-elderly-poor-narrow-broadband-service-gap-20090618-ci9x.html

This is interesting in the sense that it shows the US is investing in broadband in less well served areas – much as intended in Australia. It also shows how disadvantaged groups are typically the least well served – which has implications for the value of Personal Health Records.

The costs are interesting in that these costs are for totally unlimited download levels as are typical in the US.

Some comparative Australian information is found here:

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/survey-says-72-of-homes-have-broadband-20090619-cmcf.html

Survey says 72% of homes have broadband

June 19, 2009 - 8:29AM

South Korea, where 95 per cent of homes have broadband, topped a world survey on access to the high-speed internet.

Among other Asia-Pacific nations, Australia ranked 11th with 72 per cent, Japan ranked 16th with 64 per cent, New Zealand ranked 25th with 57 per cent and China ranked 43rd with 21 per cent.

The United States, where just 60 per cent of households had broadband as of last year, ranked 20th in the survey of 58 countries by Boston-based Strategy Analytics, released on Thursday.

Third we have:

Concern over patient records proposal

19:48 AEST Wed Jun 17 2009

By Samuel Cardwell

Doctors will be forced to hand over patients' medical records to Medicare under proposed changes to laws, despite privacy concerns.

The Senate community affairs committee handed down its final report into the exposure draft of the Rudd Government's proposed increase to Medicare compliance auditing on Thursday night.

The legislation increases Medicare Australia's auditing powers, allowing them to require doctors to hand over patient records to substantiate their benefit claims.

The committee received numerous submissions from medical and privacy groups voicing concern with the fact that private medical records could be viewed by non-medical Medicare staff as part of the audit process.

More here:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/826797/concern-over-patient-records-proposal

It is interesting that concern on this continues to bubble along – even in the mainstream media.

Fourth we have:

Cognos cures hospital staffing woes

Mater Health Services in Brisbane has implemented a workforce planning solution from IBM Cognos to help with management of its seven hospitals and 7000 staff.

"The power of the IBM Cognos workforce planning solution enables us to be forward thinking," claimed Caroline Hudson, executive director of people and learning at Mater Health Services.

Full article here:

http://tc106.metawerx.com.au/Rustreport/rustreport_jun19_09.pdf

Good to see investment in business systems is also proceeding in the hospital sector.

Fifth we have:

Aussie academic earns post as Obama health adviser

Catherine Hanrahan - Friday, 19 June 2009

AFTER a long career as a leading Australian health academic, Dr Lesley Russell (PhD) will be moving across the Pacific to share her knowledge on health policy with the US Government.

Dr Russell, a Menzies Centre for Health Policy foundation fellow at the University of Sydney, will relocate to Washington DC next month to take up a post with the Centre for American Progress, a Democratic think tank that advises the Obama Administration.

During her post – which will run for up to six years – she hopes to encourage an exchange of the best health policy ideas emerging from both countries.

“For a long time we used to look at the US and think there was nothing we could learn except how not to run a health system. I think that’s changing,” Dr Russell said.

She added that many health issues the two countries faced were surprisingly similar. She pointed to e-health as one example, noting both countries had recognised the importance of electronic patient records in creating health system efficiencies and preventing adverse events.

More here (registration required):

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/News/0,1734,4689,19200906.aspx

Dr Russell goes on to say that Australia is ahead of the US with e-Health. With what President Obama is planning and the strategic leadership vacuum in the e-Health domain we have here this situation, even if true now, won’t persist for long.

Sixth we have:

Reactor delay threatens medical tests

Richard Macey

June 17, 2009

ALMOST two years after it was shut by a technical glitch, long delays in bringing Australia's new $400 million nuclear reactor into full commercial operation continue to threaten the supply of medical isotopes needed every week for thousands of cancer and heart tests.

Australia's production of molybdenum-99, used in making key diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, stopped in January 2007 when the 49-year-old HIFAR nuclear reactor at Lucas Heights was shut down. Production was to have resumed using the new OPAL reactor, officially opened in April 2007 by the then prime minister, John Howard.

Those plans stalled when, three months after the opening, the Argentinean-designed reactor had to be shut down after 13 fuel core uranium plates came loose.

Since then the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) has been spending $100,000 a week importing the medical isotope from a South African reactor, one of only three in the world producing commercial volumes.

A global shortage was triggered recently when technical problems forced the Canadian Chalk River reactor to close. Now the third reactor, in the Netherlands, is to be shut next month for maintenance.

"South Africa is committed to maintaining Australia's supply," a Lucas Heights spokesman, Andrew Humpherson, said yesterday.

More here:

http://www.smh.com.au/national/reactor-delay-threatens-medical-tests-20090616-cgjr.html

This is a scandal in my view. How can it be that it takes 2 and a half years to get the new reactor actually doing what was one of its two core tasks (the other being research).

Seventh we have:

Hospital staff disciplined for false waiting lists

Nick McKenzie and Julia Medew

June 15, 2009

ROYAL Women's Hospital is disciplining staff it has blamed for contributing to the patient waiting list rorting scandal, after an internal investigation found hospital officials had acted in an "unacceptable" fashion.

The decision by hospital chief executive Dale Fisher to take action against a small number of employees is believed to have caused ructions, with claims that senior officials have not been held accountable.

In a statement to The Age, Ms Fisher stressed that the hospital's inquiry had been taken "very seriously". "The review has found that their behaviour and the actions of a small number of individuals is unacceptable and based on this, disciplinary procedures are now under way with those individuals," Ms Fisher said.

A hospital spokeswoman refused to reveal the seniority of the staff who had or were due to be disciplined, saying they came from "all levels".

Earlier this year, the hospital admitted it had been doctoring its elective surgery waiting lists for at least a decade. The admission came after The Age revealed that the hospital had privately admitted to the Department of Human Services that it had fudged its data.

More here:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/hospital-staff-disciplined-for-false-waiting-lists-20090614-c7er.html

This article seems to imply there has been a focus on disciplining junior staff for what were clearly policies put in place by management to improve their cash flow. If this is true it is pretty sad, to say the least! As I have said previously it is vital to ensure that any incentives that are put in place to improve performance do not have unintended consequences – such as fostering fraud and dishonesty for financial gain!

Eighth we have:

Microsoft to deliver free antimalware next Tuesday

Will deny beta of Microsoft Security Essentials, formerly 'Morro,' to users running counterfeit Windows

Gregg Keizer 19 June, 2009 07:30

Tags: windows xp, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Microsoft, anti-malware

Microsoft Corp. today said it will release a public beta of its free antimalware software, now called Microsoft Security Essentials, formerly "Morro," next Tuesday for Windows XP, Vista and Windows 7.

Although Microsoft was vague about a final ship date -- saying only that it would wrap up sometime this year -- it was crystal clear that it will deny the program to PCs running counterfeit copies of Windows.

Microsoft pitched Security Essentials as a basic antivirus, antispyware program that boasts a simplistic interface and consumes less memory and disk space than commercial security suites like those from vendors such as Symantec Corp. and McAfee Inc.

"This is security you can trust," said Alan Packer, general manager of Microsoft's antimalware team, when asked to define how it differs from rivals, both free and not. "And it's easy to get and easy to use."

He stressed the Security Essentials' real-time protection over its scanning functions, which are both integral to any security software worth its weight. "Rather than scan and clean, which it also does, it's trying to keep you from being infected in the first place," Packer said.

One of its most interesting features is what Microsoft calls "Dynamic Signature Service," a back-and-forth communications link between a Security Essentials-equipped PC and Microsoft's servers.

More here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/308128/microsoft_deliver_free_antimalware_next_tuesday?fp=16&fpid=1

It is hard to know why Microsoft did not do this years ago – but it is good they are finally seriously on the case!

Lastly the slightly more technically orientated article for the week:

Review: Hard disk vs. solid-state drive -- is an SSD worth the money?

SSDs have the speed, but HDDs have the capacity

Lucas Mearian 19 June, 2009 07:57

Tags: storage, solid-state drives, seagate, hard-disk drives

Solid-state disk (SSD) drives are all the rage among techies. The drives use non-volatile NAND flash memory, meaning there are no moving parts. Because there is no actuator arm and read/write head that must seek out data on a platter like on a hard disk drive (HDD), they are faster in reading and, in most cases, writing data.

But SSDs are also much more expensive than their hard-disk drive (HDD) counterparts, which offer 300GB of capacity or more for less than $100.

Most consumer-grade SSDs from leading vendors now cost around $3 per gigabyte, while traditional hard drives cost about 20 to 30 cents per gigabyte for 2.5-in. laptop drives and 10 to 20 cents per gigabyte for 3.5-in. desktop drives, according storage market research firm Coughlin Associates Inc. In other words, even the cheapest 120GB SSDs are going to be around $300, though some are available on sale for less. So should you buy a high-capacity HDD for little cash or plunk down hundreds of dollars more for a fast, but lower-capacity, SSD? Or, should you wait?

Coughlin Associates founder Tom Coughlin said per-gigabyte prices for HDDs and SSDs are dropping at the same pace -- about 50% per year -- so the sizeable price gap between the two will remain for years to come.

Much more here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/308109/review_hard_disk_vs_solid-state_drive_--_an_ssd_worth_money?fp=16&fpid=1

What is clear is that these solid state drives have reached the stage where in critical mobile applications, where weight, reliability and speed are important, useful disc capacity is now affordable – if not yet exactly cheap!

More next week.

David.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Google’s Flu Tracker Really Seems to be Working in Australia!

Given the recent move in our N1H1 flu alert level to ‘Protect’ I thought it would be interesting to check back with the Google Flu Trends site and see how it was going.

The main site is here:

http://www.google.org/flutrends/

If you are interested to know how the Flu Tracker works go here:

http://www.google.org/about/flutrends/how.html

Of even more interest, in the Australian context, is this page which allows access to the activity levels of flu by State.

This is found here:

http://www.google.org/flutrends/intl/en_au/

What is also interesting is that we see the Victorian hot spot and the quite low levels in the NT and WA.

This matches up just perfectly with what we see here:

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25651578-421,00.html

Australia upgrades swine flu phase to 'protect'

AAP

June 17, 2009 07:26pm

  • Australia now in "protect" swine flu phase
  • Most at risk to get drugs, less quarantine
  • Infections now over 2000

AUSTRALIA has swung into a new pandemic "protect" phase, as the number of swine flu cases soars past 2000.

The new phase will focus antiviral drugs and medical attention on those deemed most at risk, including pregnant women, the morbidly obese and those with respiratory conditions such as asthma.

People who live with or have come into contact with swine flu patients will no longer be quarantined.

Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon said the states and territories would reopen schools closed due to swine flu and students who had returned from areas affected by the disease would be allowed to attend classes.

"Excluding well children from school if they're in an area of sustained community transmission is now a less practical or useful measure,'' she said in Canberra.

Full article here (wait for map to load):

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25651578-421,00.html

Also interesting is that the graph for Victoria is looking to be running well above trend for the last few years in terms of numbers. All the other states seem to be running at trend or even a little below. I looks like when this virus get going it is an infectious little beast.

It will be interesting to keep an eye on the graph over coming weeks!

Thanks Google.

David.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Health Informatics Society Of Australia Workforce Survey Invitation.

The following comes from Dr Michael Legg, HISA President

Dear AushealthIT Blogger,

HISA is working with the Australian Department of Health and Ageing to get a better understanding of the health informatics workforce in Australia.

While there has been previous work on education in health informatics, this is the first time we are aware of that a study has been undertaken to characterise the jobs of those who work in the field.

We hope that you will see this as important enough to take the time to answer this short survey and so ensure we have a balanced and comprehensive view.

To begin the survey just click on the hyperlink below. You can also copy and paste the hyperlink into your browser to go directly to the survey site. You can contact the HISA office on 613-9388-0555 if you are having any problems with the survey.

http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/?p=WEB229B4R62VVT

The value of the survey will be greatly enhanced if it is distributed as broadly as possible. Please feel free to circulate this email to your network of colleagues or place it on the appropriate email list servers.

Thank you for your support.

Regards,

Michael

-----

Dr Michael Legg, PhD FAICD FAIM FACHI MACS(PCP) ARCPA

Principal, Michael Legg & Associates, Consultants in Information and Organisational Systems;

President, Health Informatics Society of Australia.

I hope those who have not heard about the survey elsewhere will choose to respond.

David.

Report Watch – Week of 15 June, 2009

Just an occasional post when I come upon a few interesting reports that are worth a download or browse. This week we have a few.

First we have:

Information governance

Data breaches continue to hit the headlines, even though there is plenty of guidance and more than a few products on the market to help stop them. Daloni Carlisle reports.

Now let’s be clear about this: data security is not just important, it is career limiting. And that’s not just for the home “flipping” ministers or the moat-owning MPs whose expenses were leaked to the Daily Telegraph.

These days, losing confidential patient data could mean the axe for NHS chief executives and often does mean the chop for the staff directly involved. This is a change from 18 months ago, when the loss of child benefit records by HM Revenue and Customs sparked a data security review across government and the public services.

Of course, the public sector in general and the NHS in particular did not suddenly start losing data in 2007; but the HMRC scandal put a new focus on the problem. Ever since, week after week, newspapers have been gleefully reporting the loss of laptop here, a USB stick there, ratcheting up the political need to be seen to be doing something.

Clear expectations

The NHS was, in fact, in a reasonable position to respond to the initial outcry. NHS chief executive David Nicholson and then chief information officer Matthew Swindells sent out a series of letters asking NHS organisations first to review their data security and then giving some strong and clear guidance on what they should do to protect it.

“There has been some very clear guidance from both the Cabinet Office and the Department of Health,” says Harry Cayton, chair of the National Information Governance Board. “There is no doubt that chief executives across the system recognise that information governance is a serious matter.”

The report length discussion is found here cited here:

http://www.e-health-insider.com/Features/item.cfm?&docId=300

An important topic and well worth a browse.

Second we have:

Study Looks at Genetic Testing Privacy

HDM Breaking News, June 5, 2009

Personal genetic testing services can help consumers learn of their genetic risks for disease, but consumers also need to be aware of risks to their privacy, according to a just-published study.

Personal genetic information is relevant not only for the individual who got a test, but for other family members, says Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, PhD, a co-author of the study and senior research scholar at Stanford University School of Medicine's Center for Biomedical Ethics. "For example, if you receive information on your breast cancer risk and share it with others, you might also be sharing information about your daughter's risk for breast cancer--even though she never consented to have that information shared."

.....

Much more here with links :

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/genomics-38445-1.html?ET=healthdatamanagement:e900:100325a:&st=email

The new study, "Research 2.0: Social Network and Direct-to-Consumer Genomics," was published in the June 5 issue of the American Journal of Bioethics. Registration is required and the cost is approximately $35. The special double-issue also has numerous other articles and studies assessing genomic ethical considerations.

For more information, visit bioethics.net/journal.

This is surely an area that will become more important going forward.

Third we have:

KLAS Report Takes a Comprehensive Look at Potential Components of ‘Meaningful Use’ for Hospitals

Study evaluates which acute care EMR vendor solutions have shown the most success at driving clinician adoption

OREM, Utah – June 8, 2009 – As the healthcare IT (HIT) industry awaits a formal definition for the meaningful use of electronic medical records (EMRs), HIT research firm KLAS has released a comprehensive report outlining which acute care EMR products are best positioned to achieve whatever meaningful use standard is adopted. The report, Meaningful Use Leading to Improved Outcomes, takes a broad look at the EMR market, assessing how well core clinical vendors are delivering solutions for CPOE, nursing automation, medication administration and other key areas.

“Since the introduction of the stimulus package and its provisions for health IT, much of the market rhetoric and industry debate has centered on the concept of meaningful use – what will it entail and how will it impact the receipt of stimulus dollars,” said KLAS Founder and Chairman Kent Gale. “Whatever the final definition of the term, if improved patient outcomes are indeed the ultimate goal, then some form of clinician adoption will be critical.

“In particular, deep adoption among physicians is pivotal to the overarching success of an EMR implementation,” Gale said.

The Need for Physician Adoption

The KLAS report notes that while EMR vendors Cerner, Eclipsys and Epic are the most successful with regard to physician adoption, Meditech has the largest number of clinical information system (CIS) customers over 200 beds (327 hospitals), followed by Cerner (263) and McKesson (242). However, the Meditech customer base, encompassing the MAGIC and C/S product lines, has the smallest number of hospitals over 200 beds with deep CPOE adoption – that is, where more than 50 percent of all orders are entered electronically by doctors. Only 3 percent of Meditech customers have achieved this level of adoption. Among the CIS market share leaders, McKesson exceeds Meditech in this area with 5 percent of its customer base enjoying deep adoption, while Cerner leads both McKesson and Meditech at 23 percent. GE, QuadraMed and Siemens also enjoy some success with CPOE adoption.

Beyond CPOE, the report also evaluates vendor offerings for nurse charting, an electronic medication administration record (eMAR), patient-monitor interfaces to the EMR, electronic flow sheets and barcoding at the point-of-care (BPOC) for medication administration. For each solution area, KLAS evaluates the risk the vendor poses to provider customers who want to achieve a comprehensive EMR implementation.

No vendor is perfect in every area, but Cerner and Epic are the strongest, followed by Eclipsys. Within this threesome, only Cerner extends to really meet the needs of both larger facilities over 200 beds and some community hospitals. Meditech has a broad install base across all hospital sizes and covers virtually every aspect of automation, with nurses using the product across the country; but Meditech’s Achilles’ heel is the lack of adoption by physicians. Other vendors deliver functional solutions but face a variety of challenges that have hindered deployment, such as the lack of tight integration among McKesson’s core clinical modules or Siemens Soarian clients awaiting version C6 availability.

More here:

http://www.klasresearch.com/Klas/Site/News/PressReleases/2009/MeaningfulUse.aspx

There is more detail in the press release and the full report can be purchased from KLAS.

Fourth we have:

Electronic Medication Reconciliation: A Work in Progress

Electronic medical reconciliation and process redesign lessen potential for adverse drug events.

In 2005, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations mandated medication reconciliation as a national patient safety goal. Establishing an accurate list of a patient’s current medications intuitively seems like a prerequisite for high-quality care, but few rigorous studies have been designed to assess whether medication reconciliation improves patient outcomes.

.....

Comment: Because this study was not designed to examine healthcare use or actual adverse drug events, we can say only that it provides an interesting look at how information technology and interdisciplinary collaboration potentially improve patient safety. As the authors note, the intervention was far from perfect (1.05 PADEs per patient in the intervention group), but I would expect this rate to improve as hospital teamwork becomes more pervasive and software integration evolves.

Neil H. Winawer, MD, FHM

Published in Journal Watch Hospital Medicine June 8, 2009

Citation(s):

Schnipper JL et al. Effect of an electronic medication reconciliation application and process redesign on potential adverse drug events: A cluster-randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2009 Apr 27; 169:771.

More here (subscription required):

http://hospital-medicine.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2009/608/1?q=featured_hm

Links to articles are in text.

Fifth we have:

Consumers want technology to help keep them healthy, survey shows

June 05, 2009 | Bernie Monegain, Editor

REDMOND, WA – A new survey from Microsoft Corp. shows that Americans want their doctors and their health plans to use technology to help them become healthier.

The Microsoft Health Engagement Survey 2009, conducted by Kelton Research, found that consumers want electronic coaching via e-mail and phones to help them improve health habits, self-manage conditions and better coordinate care with providers.

Kelton Research conducted the Microsoft Health Engagement Survey 2009 in March 2009 among 1,002 Americans, ages 18 and older.

"Insurers can no longer wait for consumers to self-manage their chronic conditions through standalone Web tools," said Dennis Schmuland, MD, U.S. health insurance industry solutions director at Microsoft. "Consumers want their providers and insurers to team together to help them replace bad health habits with good ones, reduce their health risks and equip them to self-manage their conditions. This requires a new generation of technology designed to proactively improve health and coordinate care at the individual and community levels."

According to the survey, 66 percent of Americans are interested in receiving health-related encouragement or reminder e-mails from their health insurance company and 52 percent would be open to receiving e-mails that provide them with feedback on their health progress. In addition, 62 percent of Americans believe that personal health record services are valuable.

Much more here:

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/consumers-want-technology-help-keep-them-healthy-survey-shows

The full report is here:

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/industries/healthandlifesciences/docs/MSHealthEngagementSurvey2009.ppt

Sixth we have:

NQF panel recommends nine EHR measures

By Jean DerGurahian / HITS staff writer

Posted: June 10, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

An expert panel established by the National Quality Forum is making nine recommendations to advance the development of standardized electronic health-record data measures.

The forum’s Health Information Technology Expert Panel, the second version of HITEP, established last November, looked at ways to expand the use of quality data sets and other electronic data sources out of guidelines first established in 2007. The panel’s report provides details on establishing a quality data set—including standard elements, quality data elements and data flow attributes—and sources of data for specific quality information.

More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090610/REG/306109993

The links are found in the text.

Seventh we have:

Video Decision-Support Tool Is Effective for Advance Care Planning in Dementia

A video depiction of advanced dementia persuaded older people to choose comfort care.

Visual images can enhance healthcare communication and decision making. In this randomized trial, Boston investigators determined the effects of a video decision-support tool on older people’s (age, 65) preferences for future care if they develop advanced dementia.

....

Comment: Unsurprisingly, older people who hear and watch depictions of advanced dementia are more likely to prefer comfort care for dementia and have more stable preferences than patients who only hear a description of dementia. These results should encourage development of video decision-support tools for other scenarios (e.g., life-sustaining technologies such as hemodialysis, left ventricular assist devices). The video is available online.

— Paul S. Mueller, MD, MPH, FACP

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine June 11, 2009

Citation(s):

Volandes AE et al. Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009 May 28; 338:b2159. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2159)

Original article (Subscription may be required)

Medline abstract (Free)

More here (subscription required):

http://general-medicine.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2009/611/3

The videos are here:

http://www.acpdecisions.com/acpdecisions/Videos.html

I must say it is hardly surprising this works!

Last we have:

Report: VA Lacks I.T. Controls

HDM Breaking News, June 10, 2009

The Office of Inspector General within the Veterans Administration is voicing concern that the VA is not effectively managing its information technology capital investments.

The OIG conducted an audit after the VA failed to meet a deadline to submit documentation to justify funds for I.T. capital investments for budget year 2010. The documentation is called Exhibit 300s.

More detail here:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/VA-38463-1.html?ET=healthdatamanagement:e905:100325a:&st=email

For the full OIG report, click here.

Enough for one week!

Enjoy!

David.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission Totally Fails to Understand E-Health!

The NHHRC released a new discussion paper earlier this month. It was entitled:

The Australian Health Care System: The Potential for Efficiency Gains (A Review of the Literature).

This links to a download page:

http://www.nhhrc.org.au/internet/nhhrc/publishing.nsf/Content/background-papers

The direct link to the document is:

http://www.nhhrc.org.au/internet/nhhrc/publishing.nsf/Content/A5665B8B9EAB34B2CA2575CB00184FB9/$File/Potential%20Efficiency%20Gains%20-%20NHHRC%20Background%20Paper.pdf

On page 23 we are told there are 3 possible solutions that can deliver improved ‘Operational Efficiency’

These are:

1. activity-based funding;

2. e-health and patient electronic health records; and

3. greater use of data through measurement and surveillance of health system performance.

The E-Health Section reads as follows:

“Solution: E-health and patient electronic health records

It is expected that the introduction of health information technology, in particular individual patient electronic health records (IEHR), would enhance labour productivity and technical efficiency within the health system. Uptake has been low because of problems associated with implementation (delays and the lack of a coherent national strategy) and the high costs associated with start-up. Currently no country can claim to have a fully implemented and operational IEHR network. Germany is arguably the most advanced, and is aiming for implementation in 2010 (at the earliest) (Bartlett and Boehncke, 2008).

Efficiencies are expected to be delivered across in-patient and out-patient services by minimising the need to transcribe medical records, wait for paper records to be delivered, and re-order tests and diagnostic imaging because the results and x-rays/scans could be attached to the IEHR. Adverse events are expected to be reduced as it will be easier to manage medicines (and their interactions) and medical histories (including, for example, allergies).

Girosi (2005) estimates that full adoption of health information technology in the US could save approximately four per cent (US$81 billion) of total yearly health spending (approximately US$1.7 trillion). Although the initial investment in information technology is high, estimated to be US$7.6 billion, the annual benefits far exceed the costs. It is anticipated that IT-enabled improvements in prevention and disease management in the US could more than double these savings while also lowering age-adjusted mortality by 18 per cent and reducing annual employee sick days by forty million. It should be noted, however, that the US is starting from a low base of IEHR usage and has particularly high health service costs and high levels of operational inefficiency. Figure 9 shows an international comparison of primary health care physicians’ use of electronic medical records, although this does not show the usage of decision support tools or the capacity for records to be shared or accessed at different sites of care.

In Australia, few studies have been undertaken on the economic impact of an IEHR. One study (ACG, 2008) commissioned by the National E-Health Transitional Authority (NEHTA) found that the economic benefit to Australia from the implementation of an IEHR network would be between $6.7 billion and $7.9 billion over 10 years (in 2008-09 dollars). This may be an overstatement as the modelling assumes significant benefits to the economy through increased workplace productivity, as IEHR would lead to improvements in chronic disease management.

There is limited evidence for this (ACG, 2008). Interestingly, the modelling found that economic benefits would be enhanced if the slower paced implementation option was followed as there would be significantly less net foreign liabilities (that is, less dependence on overseas lenders).

A more precise estimate of the benefits of an IEHR system may be possible if confined to hospital and medical services. The ACG model assumes efficiency gains because of reductions in the number of adverse events (including medical errors) and duplication of services - for example, the number of repeated tests and images. There may also be further efficiency and effectiveness gains down the track if IEHR leads to the development of better decision making tools, and more accurate and rapid diagnosis. The ACG model assumes that there will be an increase in throughput (for example, a reduction in hospital queues), rather than savings (that could, for example, be handed back to government) due to excess demand for health care. Real output in the hospital and medical services sector is expected to increase by between 4.8 and six per cent by 2019 following the implementation of an IEHR network from 2010 (ACG, 2008).

The computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system is an essential element of IEHR in hospitals, and a key to delivering anticipated efficiency gains. However, the uptake of CPOE in many countries, including Australia, is limited. CPOE allows doctors and other authorised staff to enter orders electronically - for example, medication and diagnostic tests. This removes the need for paperwork and associated transport or delivery systems, and is likely to lead to substantial savings in terms of efficiencies (and patient safety). However, there continues to be difficulties with implementation including significant disruptions to work organisation and physician resistance to the CPOE systems (Georgiou and Westbrook, 2006).

Stroetmann et al. (2006) argue that a successful e-health strategy should include achievable, shorter term goals that provide incentives for change rather than ‘big-bang’ reforms over a short period of time. While there are many expected short and long term benefits from e-health, progress is slow, and change continues to occur in a fragmented fashion. Reform will only occur over time, but the right incentives for a range of players, along with national leadership, is clearly needed (Bartlett and Boehncke, 2008).”

Where to start. It is utterly clear the writers of this section are utterly clueless about e-health. (Sorry I can’t reproduce the figures)

First they totally ignore the transaction and communication efficiency provided by modern Information Technology (the same stuff that has transformed the way banks, airlines etc operate)

Second they devote almost ½ the section to discussion of a benefits paper developed for NEHTA which is not publicly available:

“ACG (Allen Consulting Group) (2008) Economic impacts of a national Individual

Electronic Health Records system, July”

As it happens I have seen this paper – and it is a Macro Economic Model of the benefits of a totally undefined Electronic Health Record systems that is assumed to provide benefits that are based on experience in the most advanced Health IT installation in existence. All these systems are hand crafted 2 decade long efforts which are essentially not replicable in Australia.

Third they clearly have bothered to read very little of the large volume of literature available regarding the benefits of deployment of health IT. The one major benefits reference they cite is 4+ years old!

There is a vast amount of much better quality material available here:

http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=5664&parentname=CommunityPage&parentid=50&mode=2

Fourth the paper also totally ignores the place of CPOE in ambulatory practice where it is fully deployed in health systems like Kaiser Permanente supporting 8 million + insured lives.

Fifth the document totally ignores the huge amount of work done in the Deloittes National E-Health Strategy – finalised late last year – because, incredibly, they don’t seem to have a copy. Ms Roxon should fix that urgently – for the NHHRC and the rest of us!

Sixth, there are many countries way in advance of Germany in all this. Try Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands.

Seventh, the issues about definitional distortion as identified in my blogs over the last few weeks are still not addressed.

Eighth, there is no recognition of the scope of e-Health capability and how it fits as a total system enabler. If not done right this will be a fiasco. E-Health can enable a safer and better health system and the NHHRC does not get it!. Really, really sad.

I won’t go on. This is just another opportunity missed to do a proper job of work to define the place of e-Health in overall health reform.

I despair!

David.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

International News Extras For the Week (15/06/2009).

Again there has been just a heap of stuff arrive this week.

First we have:

If All Doctors Had More Time to Listen

By JULIE WEED

WHEN Dr. José Batlle met his 93-year-old patient in her small Bronx apartment, she didn’t have much furniture beyond a small TV, a sofa and a wheelchair. What she did have in abundance were pills — 15 types from a variety of doctors, including a pulmonologist, a cardiologist and a gerontologist. He discovered that some medicines had expired, others were unnecessary and some were dangerous if taken together.

Sitting with his patient and her son, Dr. Batlle cut the number of her medicines to four. He also gave the family his personal cellphone number.

Before coming to see him, the woman had endured several emergency-room visits and hospital stays. With Dr. Batlle, she was able to avoid all of that.

Calling a doctor on his cell? No waiting for an appointment? It’s the type of service that Dr. Batlle tries to offer to all of his 1,500 patients. “I prefer to keep them healthy than treat them when they are sick,” he says.

The efforts of Dr. Batlle and other primary care physicians may get a boost at the federal level. The Obama administration is considering ways to persuade medical students to pursue careers in primary care by raising their pay, and is channeling them to work in underserved rural areas. And the White House has already set aside $2 billion for community health centers through the economic stimulus package.

But more far-reaching health care reform remains an uncertainty, and in the interim a small but growing number of doctors are trying to take matters into their own hands.

By stepping off the big-clinic treadmill, where doctors are sometimes asked to see a different patient every 15 minutes, Dr. Batlle has joined the vanguard of physicians trying to redefine health care. These doctors spend more time with patients, emphasize prevention and education to keep them healthy and can handle many medical problems without referrals to specialists.

In many cases, this kind of care can reduce a patient’s medical bills. That’s more crucial than ever: according to a study published online by the American Journal of Medicine, 60 percent of all bankruptcies in the United States in 2007 were driven by health care costs.

Exact numbers are hard to come by, but doctors involved in this movement, called “patient centered” practices, say its popularity is growing.

“I travel to a lot of medical conferences, and I’m meeting more and more doctors embarking on this path,” said Dr. L. Gordon Moore, who runs IdealMedicalPractices.org, a program to help small practices become more innovative and efficient. The Web site IdealMedicalHome.org has about 800 doctors who post and trade ideas, while more than 700 physicians have adopted methods from HowsYourHealth.org. Many of these doctors see fewer patients per day than they did before.

To make personalized care possible in an era when compensation is often tied to the number of patients they see, doctors use technology to streamline processes and reduce administrative costs. Dr. Batlle, for example, uses online appointment scheduling and manages his medical records electronically. He prescribes medications from his computer and offers virtual visits by phone and e-mail.

Much more here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/health/07health.html?_r=1&hpw

Technology enabled practice improvement is a major trend that appears to be gaining increasing strength.

Second we have:

Province getting with IT program

OKs software for electronic medical records

By: Martin Cash

6/06/2009 12:39 PM | Comments: 0

MANITOBA eHealth has tapped a B.C. medical software company to become one of the first players to participate in the long march into the electronic era of medical record-keeping.

But even Manitoba eHealth officials acknowledge that Manitoba has fallen behind other provinces in the develop­ment and implementation of informa­tion technology.

Optimed Software Corp. of Kelowna, B.C., is the first to have its electronic medical records (EMR) software ap­proved in Manitoba. Its software, Accuro EMR, provides digital sched­uling and billing as well as detailed patient record-keeping services for doctors' offices and clinics.

The province's qualification pro­cess is to be completed by mid-July and there may be as many as three more companies whose EMR soft­ware could get endorsed.

Optimed may have passed the entry hurdle, but now it has to go out and sell the technology to clinics and doc­tors' offices. That may be tougher for Optimed than it is elsewhere because Manitoba is the only province west of Quebec that does not provide a sub­sidy to help doctors cover the costs of implementing the technology.

Governments in some provinces are covering up to 70 per cent of monthly subscription costs that can run more than $300 a month per doctor.

Optimed has about 750 doctors using its software in B.C., Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Much more here:

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/business/Province-getting-with-IT-program-47124577.html

At least some parts of Canada are really getting on with it..given the Ontario scandals we read about last week.

Third we have:

Amalga Helps Hospital Keep Swine Flu in Check

Elizabeth Montalbano, IDG News Service

Monday, June 08, 2009 12:00 PM PDT

When fears over the swine flu first broke out in many parts of the world in April, El Camino Hospital in Mountain View, California, was about to pull the trigger on an implementation of Microsoft's Amalga software.

Plans changed slightly, however, when hospital officials realized they might possibly have a flu pandemic on their hands, said Dr. Michael Gallagher, director of business intelligence and outcomes for El Camino.

The hospital did implement Amalga as planned, but with an addition to it designed to track patients that came to the hospital with flu-like symptoms -- as well as anyone else who may have been in contact with them in the emergency department, he said.

"We had to know who was exposed, how to track these patients," he said. "Because the Amalga system was extremely flexible, we put together a new application for tracking patients as they showed up in our emergency department."

Amalga is Microsoft's e-health aggregation software that helps health-care institutions like hospitals and other health-care service providers by capturing and storing patient and other information from disparate systems and presenting it in one place.

It took only three hours from concept to deployment to create the tracking software using Amalga, said Steve Shihadeh, vice president of the Microsoft Health Solutions Group.

While El Camino took the lead in conceptualizing, creating and implementing the tool, Microsoft showed them how it could be done through a feature of Amalga called User-Self Service, he said, which allows people to create a new application very quickly by re-using data aggregated by Amalga, he said.

Full reporting continues here:

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/166310/amalga_helps_hospital_keep_swine_flu_in_check.html

Good to see the capability being developed to respond flexibly to emerging threats.

Fourth we have:

June 08, 2009

HIT Adoption - Alignment & Simplification

By

David Hartzband is a Lecturer in Engineering Systems at MIT, teaching courses in large-scale software systems and Director of Technology Research at the RCHN Community Health Foundation. In his role at the Foundation, Dr. Hartzband spearheads the organization’s continued evaluation, assessment and findings dissemination related to health information technology.

As if we didn't know already, most of the leadership of Health and Human Services has now weighed in on the importance of health information technology (HIT) in realizing goals for health care improvement and reform. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a House Ways and means Committee hearing on May 6th that “health IT is critical to health reform”. To her credit, she also said that “just shifting our paperwork to computers won't work, unless we make sure they can talk to each other.” We also know that substantial amounts of money will be available through the ARRA and other sources for acquisition of electronic heath care records systems (EHR) as well as incentives to Medicare and Medicaid providers for meaningful use of such systems. Those of us who have worked in HIT, for even short amounts of time, realize that there is a step missing in this progression: acquisition,-----, meaningful use. That missing step is the adoption of technology, and adoption is considerably more difficult than either of these other steps.

Many studies have been done on what impedes or facilitates adoption. The factors most often found are: 1) technical - system complexity and lack of integration with existing systems; 2) cost - initial investment, lack of funds for training, maintenance etc., unclear ROI; 3) social or cultural - unprepared workforce, lack of management commitment, privacy issues and finally; 4) alignment - technology not well matched to work flows and work styles of users, system not useful to users. AHRQ did a study several years ago on this (2006) and found that the biggest impediments to adoption of HIT were: cost-benefit misalignment, technological complexity, lack of data integration, lack of workforce preparedness & lack of motivation on the part of providers. Some things have changed since then, but not all that much.

OK - so we won't reach meaningful use of EHR technology, let alone other necessary and productive health information technologies, just by throwing money at the problem, even by paying incentives to providers. How can we ensure that EHR and these other technologies are adopted? After all, we'll realize no benefits from HIT even if it is acquired and deployed. This is just a lost sunk cost without adoption. As a technologist, I am most familiar with what can be done on the technology side, so I'll make some suggestions there first.

Much more here:

http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2009/06/meaningful-use-of-ehr---ask-the-users.html

This is a useful list of the factors impacting adoption – and some possible approaches. Well worth a browse.

Fifth we have:

NJ University Hospital EMS pilots smartphones for heart failure

Friday - June 5th, 2009 - 12:47pm EST by Brian Dolan | EMS | heart failure | University Hospital New Jersey |

Just yesterday we reported on the growing competition between wireless remote monitoring companies CardioNet and LifeWatch, which both help physicians monitor patients at risk for heart arrythmias via wireless devices and sensors. How can wireless health services help people who actually have heart failure, though? The University Hospital in New Jersey with help from Verizon Wireless and Medtronic created a program to determine how wireless technologies and improved operational processes could reduce the time it took to get a heart failure patient into a physician’s care and make better use of the time that first responders had with the patient while in transit to the hospital.

The program demonstrates how smartphones, Bluetooth-enabled monitors and pagers could all work together to create a system that reduces the time and increases the efficiencies involved in getting a heart failure patient the care they need. Here are some of the technical and operational issues the program dealt with — be sure to read the entire article over at EMS Responder for more.

Much more here:

http://mobihealthnews.com/2548/nj-university-hospital-ems-pilots-smartphones-for-heart-failure/

The move to mobile tools and techniques in E-Health is gaining pace.

Nortel's clinic in Richardson aims to improve medical care

07:39 AM CDT on Monday, June 8, 2009

By VICTOR GODINEZ / The Dallas Morning News
vgodinez@dallasnews.com

From pacemakers to prosthetic limbs, technology is a routine part of modern medical care.

But Nortel Networks is using a prototype medical clinic at its Richardson offices to demonstrate something a little different.

Rather than using technology to create new clinical tools, Nortel is using software and hardware to make hospital visits shorter, more productive and less nerve-wracking.

A tour of Nortel's new facility is eye-popping both for the ingenuity of the products and the relative simplicity of the underlying technology.

Forget 3-D holograms or electronic prescription pads or robot doctors.

Instead, Nortel's vision is built on tried-and-true consumer technologies such as Wi-Fi, cellular phones and RFID.

Wes Durow, Nortel's vice president of enterprise marketing in Richardson, said the technology in the clinic, which went live just a few weeks ago, is designed expressly to help health care companies make and save money.

"How do you overcome the nurse shortage?" he said. "How do you overcome the doctor shortage? How do you help a hospital that can't raise capital in this market do more with less?"

While the technologies are designed to make life easier for hospitals and doctors' offices, patients should be among the biggest beneficiaries.

Much more here:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/DN-nortel_07bus.ART.State.Edition1.41155bc.html

This provides some interesting examples of how mobile technologies are envisaged as working to assist.

There is even more here:

http://mobihealthnews.com/2564/fda-approves-medapps-wireless-remote-monitoring/#more-2564

FDA approves MedApps wireless remote monitoring

Friday - June 5th, 2009 - 07:11pm EST by Brian Dolan | blood glucose monitor | Diabetes | FDA | MedApps | pulse oximeter | remote monitoring |

Seventh we have:

How the Government's Spending Spree on Electronic Medical Records will Reshape the Industry

Friday, June 05, 2009

· Analysis by: GLG Expert Contributor

· Analysis of: Electronic Patient Records will Force Consolidation in Health Care | bits.blogs.nytimes.com

· Source: www.glgroup.com

Implications:

The unprecedented spending by the federal government to support the implementation of electronic medical records (by some estimates as much as $36 billion in total federal outlays over a five year period starting at the end of 2010--a hundred fold increase over previous governmental subsidies) will also have profound effects on the industry itself, the shape of physician practices and the delivery and financing of healthcare.

Analysis:

The government's spending spree will set off an acquisition spree as large technology firms buy health IT companies to gain market share. Look for companies like General Electric, Siemens, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, McKesson and Google (among others) to swoop in and devour Allscripts, Epic, Cerner, not to mention eClinical Works, Quality Systems, Inc., and Eclipsys in the next three to five years.

More here:

http://www.glgroup.com/News/How-the-Governments-Spending-Spree-on-Electronic-Medical-Records-will-Reshape-the-Industry-40085.html

There is no doubt the change provoked will be very considerable indeed!

Eighth we have:

Feds plan more health IT services, fewer networks

The federal health information technology community plans a significant upgrade to its NHIN Connect software in the coming year, including adding tools to manage patient identification and health documents via the Nationwide Health Information Network.

New enterprise services planned for Connect, a software gateway that gives federal health agencies access to the NHIN, include a master index for managing patient identities, policy engine to handle health records authorizations and registry to organize patient health documents.

In April the Federal Health Architecture released an open-source version of the Connect gateway software that included core NHIN services, including patient look-up and record retrieval.

Vish Sankaran, FHA program director, said the new services would help move the project a step closer to becoming a tool that would “make a real impact on the lives of ordinary Americans.” He spoke at a panel discussion on federal health information sharing at the Government Health IT conference yesterday.

“We now live in a world where you can get information at your fingertips on virtually every topic known to mankind," he said. "Yet the most important area of all — our health — can’t easily get info when we need it. It’s time to change this once and for all; federal agencies are committed to moving this forward.”

Full article here:

http://govhealthit.com/articles/2009/06/05/feds-plan-more-health-it-services-fewer-networks.aspx

The next step as the networks grow and coalesce.

Ninth we have:

Continua adds two wireless standards to guidelines

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: June 8, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

The Continua Health Alliance, a not-for-profit consortium of healthcare information technology companies and medical device manufacturers seeking to harmonize data transmission standards usage for home health appliances, has chosen two wireless technology standards for the second version of its Continua Health Alliance Design Guidelines, the organization announced today.

Much more here (with links – registration required):

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090608/REG/306089973

More activity on the mobile front as already mentioned above.

Lots more on Continua here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090610/REG/306109994

Progress made in data-transmission standards

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: June 10, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Tenth we have:

Researchers to study data from VA EMR system

The initiative will allow VA-affiliated physicians to discover better ways to handle various diseases, including cancer and congestive heart failure.

By Pamela Lewis Dolan, AMNews staff. Posted June 8, 2009.

The U.S. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs for the first time is opening up its electronic medical records to allow researchers from across the system to look at the data.

The de-identified, aggregated data of veterans will allow researchers to pinpoint the most effective treatments for specific conditions, including posttraumatic stress disorder and antibiotic-resistant staph infection.

The VA says the result will be broader clinical studies that will provide physicians, both inside and out of the system, with better data on the best treatment methods for various conditions. The project will also show how the same data-mining methods could be used in other health information exchanges, including the national health information network, once it's fully up and running.

Matthew Samore, MD, an infectious disease and epidemiology physician from the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, who is heading Utah's part in the project, said researchers with the VA, like those within other health care networks, have traditionally only had access to the data from their local facilities.

More here:

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/06/08/bisa0608.htm

This is a continuing demonstration of the value of large quantities of detailed EHR information in carrying out clinical research .

Eleventh for the week we have:

Health Minister Receives Telemedicine Delegate

2009-06-09 18:04:58 | | Хэвлэх | Найздаа илгээх |

Ulaanbaatar,/MONTSAME/ The Minister of Health S.Lambaa received Tuesday Yunkap Kwankam, the executive director of the International Society for Telemedicine and e-Health (ISTMeH). Mr Kwankam who has been working for 8 years as the executive director is visiting Mongolia for the first time in order to give professional and methodical advice on working out documents for developing e-health sector in Mongolia.

More here:

http://www.montsame.mn/index.php?option=com_news&task=news_detail&tab=200906&ne=511

It is even happening in Mongolia! Not a place I would have expected to have even heard of e-Health. Just shows you how wrong and ignorant one can be!

http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/Display_news.asp?section=Local_News&subsection=Qatar+News&month=June2009&file=Local_News2009060963612.xml

ictQatar developing e-healthcare system

Web posted at: 6/9/2009 6:36:12

Source ::: THE PENINSULA/ BY CHRIS V PANGANIBAN

Qatar even!

Twelfth we have:

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Using Twitter for EZ-HIT: Accessible, Fast Platform Has Much To Offer

by Jane Sarasohn-Kahn

"Twitter understands Web 2.0 better than Facebook," Tim O'Reilly told a group attending a Launchbox start-up confab in early June 2009.

Two weeks prior, I had offered testimony to the privacy subcommittee of the National Center for Vital and Health Statistics responding to the question, "What Will Consumer-Facing Health IT Look Like in five or 10 Years?"

In a nutshell, I said that health citizens (whom you can alternatively call consumers, patients, caregivers or people) would be engaged with their health and their health data, which would be more liquid, accessible, engaging, actionable and user-friendly.

While it may or may not be with us five or 10 years from now, Twitter has become a useable, engaging platform in health care. It's accessible, useable and fun.

More here:

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Perspectives/2009/Using-Twitter-for-EZHIT-Accessible-Fast-Platform-Has-Much-To-Offer.aspx

Fun article with lots of links and ideas!

Thirteenth we have:

Technology Offers Real-Time Monitoring of Hand Washing

Carrie Vaughan, for HealthLeaders Media, June 9, 2009

Washing hands is a key component to preventing healthcare-acquired infections and improving patient safety. Yet, knowing which staff members are more compliant with hand washing policies is challenging at best for supervisors and senior leaders. Organizations often rely on observational studies to track and monitor hand washing, but if staff members know that they are being watched, they'll probably alter their typical behavior and wash hands more frequently.

I'm not suggesting that staff members are intentionally foregoing hand washing procedures, but given the pace of healthcare settings, it's an easy thing for clinicians to forget to do as frequently as they should. Soon, however, healthcare executives will have a new tool to track hand washing in their organizations and staff members will have a subtle reminder to wash hands if they forgot.

A new device, called HyGreen, is being developed at the University of Florida that can detect whether employees have washed their hands by "smelling" for alcohol, which nearly every hygiene soap product contains.

More here:

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/234235/topic/WS_HLM2_TEC/Technology-Offers-RealTime-Monitoring-of-Hand-Washing.html

Now this could be taking monitoring clinician activity a step too far!

Fourteenth we have:

Decision Makers Differ on How To Mend Broken Health System

By Ceci Connolly
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Nowhere else in the world is so much money spent with such poor results.

On that point there is rare unanimity among Washington decision makers: The U.S. health system needs a major overhaul.

For more than a decade, researchers have documented the inequities, shortcomings, waste and even dangers in the hodgepodge of uncoordinated medical services that consume nearly one-fifth of the nation's economy. Exorbitant medical bills thrust too many families into bankruptcy, hinder the global competitiveness of U.S. companies and threaten the government's long-term solvency.

But the consensus breaks down on the question of how best to create a coordinated, high-performing, evidence-based system that provides the right care at the right time to the right people.

During eight years in office, President George W. Bush took an incremental approach, adding prescription drug benefits to the Medicare program for seniors and the disabled and expanding the number of community clinics nationwide. President Obama, like the last Democrat to occupy the White House, contends that was insufficient and is pushing for an ambitious reworking of the entire $2.3 trillion system.

Lots more here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/08/AR2009060804125_pf.html

The associated graph shows just how large the problem the US has to address is!

Fifteenth we have:

First stage of Sweden’s e-health scheme deployed

More than 500 of clinicians and clinical staff in the Swedish region of Örebro now have authorised access to records of all patients’ in the area, with the successful implementation of the first phase of the country’s National Patient Overview (NPO) project.

NPO is Sweden’s national electronic health records scheme, which aims to improve patient security and the quality of care by delivering the solution nationwide in stages. Its core is the National Patient Summary (NPS), undertaken by the Swedish Healthcare Advisory Organisation (Sjukvårdsrådgivningen SVR AB).

More here:

http://www.futuregov.net/articles/2009/jun/04/first-stage-swedens-national-ehr-deployed/

Again we find a country rolling on as we stay in the mire!

Further information is found here:

http://www.ehealtheurope.net/news/4909/orebro_first_with_swedish_summary_record

Orebro first with Swedish summary record

Sixteenth we have:

Doctors: When tech improves the personal touch

Monday - June 8th, 2009 - 04:12pm EST by Brian Dolan | Apple | Better Health | Dr. Eric Topol | Dr. Natalie Hodge | Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong | EMRs | Epocrates | iPhone | UCLA |

Doctors “know instinctively that the human side of medicine — the attentive listening, the visual cues, the continued eye contact, and the careful history and physical exam — is critical…” Dr. Val Jones, CEO of Better Health, wrote in a commentary piece last week. “The problem we have with EMRs is that they often interrupt the sensitive and intuitive parts of what we do. EMRs and other digital ‘tools’ designed to make our work more efficient, may do so at the expense of the human connectedness our patients deserve and need.”

Jones’ commentary is a must-read for anyone interested in new technology’s impact on the patient-doctor relationship. As she notes, a more efficient practice is not necessarily a more effective one.

Much more here:

http://mobihealthnews.com/2592/when-tech-improves-the-personal/

Worth a browse and to follow the link.

Fourth last we have:

US Oncology Launches Oncology-Specific EHR to the Open Market

By: PR Newswire

Jun. 10, 2009 12:33 PM

iKnowMed now available to community-based oncology practices

HOUSTON, June 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Today US Oncology, Inc., supporting the nation's foremost cancer treatment and research network and working with physicians, manufacturers and payers to advance cancer care in America, announces the launch of iKnowMed(TM) to the open market. iKnowMed is an oncology-specific electronic health record (EHR) system designed by oncologists for oncologists.

Developed in 1996, US Oncology acquired iKnowMed in 2004. The comprehensive collaboration between the oncology physicians since the acquisition has led to a technology excellence that is completely focused on the needs of community oncologists and their patients.

Today's iKnowMed goes beyond delivering standard EHR features by leveraging technology that helps physicians focus on clinical excellence and cost effectiveness in community cancer care. iKnowMed facilitates access to powerful new solutions such as US Oncology's Innovent Oncology program, which provides Level I evidence-based medicine pathways to help oncologists realize the benefits of pay-for-performance. For practices participating in the US Oncology Research network, iKnowMed can match patients to appropriate clinical trials, increasing access to the latest treatment opportunities across the nation.

Much more here:

http://in.sys-con.com/node/997514

This is a trend I am sure we will see more of..the emergence of speciality specific EHR solutions.

Third last we have:

Data Challenges on the EHR Agenda
By John Glaser

While preparing to adopt or expand electronic records, providers shouldn't overlook the quality of the data these systems will contain.

The health care information technology portions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) have led to heightened interest in the adoption and effective use of electronic health records. Given the importance of improving many facets of care and the magnitude of the stimulus funds, this attention is appropriate.

Most of the discussion about advancing EHRs centers on areas such as meaningful use, certification, interoperability and regional extension centers. Underneath these topics is the industry's focus on the software application called the electronic health record. For example, when the industry talks about adoption and effective use, it is referring to the EHR software application. And when the industry discusses interoperability, it is focusing on EHR applications being interoperable with each other.

This focus on the EHR software application should not distract us from also concentrating on the data in the EHR. Both the near and intermediate terms of the national EHR agenda pose several data challenges:

  • Large-scale information exchange among health care entities raises data management questions for both the senders and recipients of data. For example, under which conditions can data from one organization be used for clinical research by another organization? And if one organization needs to amend data it has exchanged with others, how is that amendment propagated?
  • Changes in privacy regulations will require improvements in data access controls and tracking data movement within and between organizations.
  • Broad EHR adoption will open the door to a diverse set of secondary uses of data for clinical research, care improvement, population health and post-market medication surveillance. Early efforts to leverage EHR-based data to accelerate clinical research, and to dramatically improve the efficiency of post-market surveillance, show promise but have also exposed data quality problems.
  • Widespread EHR adoption may accelerate use of personal health records. Patients using PHRs will likely increase their contributions of data, such as measurements from home monitoring equipment, to their EHRs.
  • Federal efforts to improve safety and quality will increase the use of clinical decision support. This, in turn, will heighten the focus on data that drives support algorithms and rules. For example, if the problem and medication lists are incomplete, the potency of drug-drug interaction warnings in the EHR can be seriously diluted.

Much more here:

http://www.hhnmag.com/hhnmag_app/jsp/articledisplay.jsp?dcrpath=HHNMAG/Article/data/06JUN2009/090608HHN_Online_Glaser&domain=HHNMAG

This is a very important point and one that can be easily overlooked!

Second last for the week we have:

'Dysfunctional work plans' prompted firm to cut ties with eHealth

Well before spending scandal erupted, Stevenson Kellogg chose to leave thousands of dollars on the table, rather than continue its association with the organization

Lisa Priest and Karen Howlett

Toronto — From Wednesday's Globe and Mail,

A consulting firm abruptly terminated its lucrative contract with eHealth Ontario last February after only four weeks on the job, citing delays, wasted time and dysfunctional work plans.

Well before the scandal erupted over eHealth's lavish spending on consultants, Stevenson Kellogg chose to leave thousands of dollars on the table, rather than continue its association with the organization.

“We terminated the contract because of my severe discontent with most aspects of the work, including the dysfunctional work plans, the delays and waste of time, and the personal styles of the team leaders,” Nigel Kelly, a partner and chief administrative officer at Stevenson Kellogg, confirmed in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail.

Mr. Kelly said in a telephone interview Tuesday that it was the only time in his 30-year career he has ever terminated a contract. He was to receive $113,250, documents show, but got only a portion of that after quitting two months early.

More here:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/dysfunctional-work-plans-prompted-firm-to-cut-ties-with-ehealth/article1175691/

Sounds like a smart and principled consultant to me. A lesson for all involved in consulting about how to come out well when you know things are just not OK! The lessons from eHealth Ontario just keep coming!

Last, and very usefully, we have:

Map of Medicine use cuts poor referrals

08 Jun 2009

Use of Map of Medicine in primary care has led to a significant reduction in inadequate referrals from GPs, according to a new study.

Doctors from the Institute of Nephrology in Cardiff looked at the impact of a patient care pathway for chronic kidney disease on Map of Medicine.

They found use of the knowledge management tool cut inadequate referrals by almost 50% and also led to a slight reduction in overall referrals.

The researchers studied referrals for chronic kidney disease (CKD) from GPs in five local health boards covering 550,000 people in South Wales following the inclusion of CKD in the Quality and Outcomes Framework in 2006.

The doctors reported that there was an abrupt increase in referrals from the inclusion of CKD in the QoF with an overall increase of 61% across 30 months since April 2006.

Much more with link here:

http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/4911/map_of_medicine_use_cuts_poor_referrals

This is something recommended for implementation in the Deloittes National E-Health Strategy that has just been ignored by Ms Roxon and her hopeless Department. Big impact for low cost!

There is an amazing amount happening. Enjoy!

David.