Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Monday, January 23, 2012

AusHealthIT Poll Number 105 – Results – 23rd January, 2012.

The question was:
Do You Believe The $1 Million per Day Being Spent on the PCEHR is Being Well Spent?
Of Course
-  2 (4%)
Probably
-  4 (9%)
Neutral
  0 (0%)
Probably Not
- 8 (18%)
Are You Kidding?
-  29 (67%)
Votes 43
That seems pretty clear - 85% think the money is not being well spent
Again, many thanks to those that voted!
David.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Ms Roxon Got This One Badly Wrong! Over To The New Minister To Fix It.

Again we have some new stuff being sort of slipped in at the last minute on the PCEHR.

E-Health vetting plan abandoned

THE Gillard government has abandoned any intention of creating an independent oversight body for the future operation of its controversial personally controlled e-health record system, due to launch on July 1.
Instead, the official operator of the $500m nationwide network will be the Secretary of the federal Health Department – mooted in legislation currently before parliament as an interim position until key governance issues can be resolved, including greater public accountability.
A broad range of bodies, including the Consumers Health Forum, the Australian Privacy Foundation, the Pharmacy Guild, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, the Medical Software Industry Association and individual vendors have called for the establishment of a broad-based new PCEHR governance structure.
But in an addendum to the PCEHR Concept of Operations issued late Wednesday, Health says the departmental secretary will take on the role permanently, with a small caveat that “another body established by a law of the Commonwealth may be prescribed by the regulations to be the System Operator in the future, if necessary”.
The policy previously stated that “The PCEHR system would be managed by a single System Operator under a governance model that would be defined in the future”.
Now, the department says: “Having the Secretary of the Department as the System Operator will ensure accountability and transparency of operations and coverage by commonwealth financial, data security and privacy arrangements.
“It will also allow a smooth transition from contractual governance arrangements established for the system build, and the ability to coordinate the necessary jurisdictional and stakeholder involvement.”
The operator will be aided by a Jurisdictional Advisory Committee, comprising one representative from each of the federal, state and territory health departments, and an Independent Advisory Council which includes healthcare provider, consumer and other sector stakeholder representatives, although observers have previously noted the operator is not obliged to heed any advice from either source.
Lots more here:
Since this article was published (early Friday 20th Jan) we have also seen similar governance issues raised by:
1. The Aboriginal Medical Service Alliance of the Northern Territory (AMSANT)
2. The Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations (AFAO)
3. The Royal Australian and NZ College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP)
4. The Australian Psychological Society (APS).
They have also added their voice to the demands for much improved and legislated (for certainty) governance of the PCEHR System.
The issue is pretty clear to me. There is an obvious conflict of interest between the Secretary as System Operator and as the Head of DoHA the moment a citizen complains to DoHA regarding some issue with the PCEHR. This simply cannot be the same person. And whoever it turns out to be needs a proper framework in which to decide and act etc.
The outcome of and response to this consistent set of recommendations and concerns will be a very reliable litmus test of just how much actual consultative listening is going on in DoHA. Watch this space very closely.
Other than this theme (and a certain amount of rent-seeking from the Pharmacy Guild - who want it to be easier to get hold of the money for e-prescription use) the other interesting requests are to expand to pool of those who can manage / contribute to a PCEHR. The midwives, pharmacists and aboriginal health workers are all keen!
We also have widely raised concerns about cost impacts - and at the time of writing we have yet to hear from the AMA who I am sure will have something to say on that matter!
There is a lot of work to be done to get this system back on the rails. I hope the new Minister has had a look at a few of the submissions over the break!
Note: In late breaking news there are rumours of some issues with the PCEHR Program plans and design. Might also keep the Minister a little busy next week? My sources are certainly suggesting some problems are emerging.
David.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Weekly Overseas Health IT Links - 21st January, 2012.

Note: Each link is followed by a title and few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.
-----

7 Reasons Hospitals Buy Technology They Don't Need

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , January 12, 2012

Why do healthcare chiefs keep buying high-priced gadgets and gizmos that don't improve quality of care? It defies logic. So I asked around to see if anyone could explain this phenomenon.
I was intrigued by last week's report from the independent, non-profit ECRI Institute, which uses the science of evidence to advise clients how to avoid bad purchasing decisions. The document lists 10 technologies, many of which ECRI's experts say hospitals should resist or delay, because data showing they improve care is weak or doesn't exist.
We keep hearing that health providers should be cutting costs, not building and spending on glamour and glitz. The Independent Payment Advisory Board is poised to set draconian reimbursement reductions. And comparative effectiveness findings stemming from the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute will distinguish those treatments and devices that add value from those that don't.
-----

Technology key to growing consumerism trend in healthcare

January 12, 2012 — 5:38pm ET | By Gienna Shaw
Consumerism in healthcare is one of those trends that has been "looming" for an awfully long time. When the experts first predicted that patients would start shopping for providers as if healthcare was any other businesses--making decisions based on price, quality, and brand recognition, for example--the idea was met with skepticism, to say the least.
Over the years, the language used to describe the concept of consumerism morphed: the call for transparency gave way to talk of patient satisfaction to build loyalty, which in turn shifted to cries for a better patient experience to improve quality. And lately the focus has shifted, yet again, to patient engagement and e-patients.
-----
Friday, January 13, 2012

eHealth Initiative Shifts Focus to Chronic Diseases

by Kate Ackerman, iHealthBeat Managing Editor
WASHINGTON -- At its annual conference in Washington, D.C., this week, the eHealth Initiative announced a change in focus. Starting this year, eHI plans to concentrate on the role health IT can play in addressing chronic diseases. Specifically, the organization will target cancer, diabetes and heart disease.
eHI CEO Jennifer Covich Bordenick said that after 10 years, it's time for the organization to "sharpen our focus." She told iHealthBeat, "Focusing on chronic diseases is a natural progression of the mission of the group; it brings us one step closer to the end goal." She added, "We are not just talking about technology for the sake of technology. If you want to greatly impact the cost and quality of health care, you must focus on the deadliest and costliest diseases."
Covich Bordenick said reaction from members and other health IT stakeholders about the group's new focus "has been overwhelmingly positive." She said, "When you talk to physicians, patients and providers they get it: You can share social media technologies with cancer patients that help them better understand their disease, highlight apps that doctors can recommend to patients to manage diabetes [and] identify gaps where vendors can develop analytical tools that identify patients at risk for heart disease."
-----

Designing a more user-friendly patient portal

January 12, 2012 — 9:31am ET | By Marla Durben Hirsch - Contributing Editor
With an increased emphasis on patient access to their own health data, electronic health system vendors are offering patient portals to their offerings, according to an article published by the Healthcare Billing Management Association (HBMA).
Patient portals play an important role for electronic health records, according to the article. They enable providers and patients to communicate with each other and help providers meet Meaningful Use requirements.
-----

Ford, Microsoft to develop 'Doctor in Your Car'

January 12, 2012 | Healthcare IT News Staff
LAS VEGAS – Ford, Microsoft, Healthrageous and BlueMetal Architects will collaboratively develop new technology to help drivers monitor health and wellness while in their automobiles.
The alliance was unveiled  in a keynote “Doctor in Your Car” at the Digital Health Summit at the International Consumer Electronic Show in Las Vegas.
“People are spending more time in their cars, and with the tremendous growth in mobile healthcare solutions, Ford is dedicated to understanding the value of being able to connect to health and wellness-related services while driving,” said Gary Strumolo, manager of Infotainment, Interiors, Health and Wellness at Ford Research and Innovation. “Our connectivity platform – Ford SYNC – provides easy, voice-controlled access to mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets, and therefore it makes sense to research areas that are important to our customers.”
-----

Southampton buys Amalga for readmissions

12 January 2012   Shanna Crispin
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust has become the second in the UK to buy Microsoft’s Amalga readmissions platform.
Milton Keynes was the first to buy the US-developed system in January 2010. Now the Southampton trust is to use it as part of its work to reduce patient readmissions, which director of organisational development, Jane Hayward, told eHealth Insider were a constant problem.
“We do have patients that have been readmitted 25 times in the last year... 9% of our emergency patients have previously been admitted within the 30 days leading up to that readmission.”
-----

Humber pushes ahead with Lorenzo

9 January 2012   Shanna Crispin
Humber NHS Foundation Trust has started to introduce the Lorenzo electronic patient record system, even though the future of the contract under which it is being delivered remains uncertain.
The trust became the fourth early adopter for Lorenzo as part of CSC's local service provider contract for the North, Midlands and East of England, when Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust pulled out in April last year.
Pennine Care's decision to leave the early adopter programme was a blow to the National Programme for IT in the NHS in the NME.
-----

Researchers create interactive tool to predict likelihood of death

January 12, 2012 — 2:00pm ET | By Ken Terry
Researchers at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) have identified 16 prognostic scales that can be used to estimate the life expectancy of older adults with a fair degree of accuracy. They also have created an interactive tool for the same purpose, which is posted at www.ePrognosis.org, according to the New York Times.
While the tool is available to the public, it is designed mainly for physicians who are trying to estimate how much time their patients have left before recommending specific treatments. This kind of estimate can help prevent overtreatment and complications in elderly people who will likely die before they can benefit from therapy. It can also help doctors determine whether patients are robust enough to withstand particular procedures or other treatments.
-----

6 ways to use business intelligence software

January 09, 2012 | Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer
With the onslaught of health IT initiatives such as meaningful use, ICD-10, and ACOs, healthcare organizations can have a hard time keeping up. But one type of software can make a positive impact in a number of different ways, said Fred Pennic, founder of HIT Consultant and senior advisor at Aspen Advisors. 
“Business intelligence software can provide organizations with the consolidated data tools necessary to standardize data, reduce data redundancy and costs, comply with industry standards and identify new opportunities to improve efficiency,” he said. 
Pennic suggests six ways to use business intelligence software.  
-----

Can electronic health records erase disparities?

NEW YORK | Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:23am EST
(Reuters Health) - Switching to electronic health records might help close health gaps between black and white Americans, researchers suggest in a new study.
They say government data on primary care visits from 2007 to 2008 show that when doctors didn't use digital records, there was a racial gap in how many patients had high blood pressure. But there was no such gap among patients treated at practices with electronic record-keeping.
That could be important, because African Americans are more likely to have high blood pressure than whites, which might in turn explain why they also have more heart attacks, strokes and kidney disease, said Dr. Lipika Samal, who worked on the new study.
-----

CMS EHR programs paid $2.5B in 2011

January 10, 2012 | Mary Mosquera
The Medicare and Medicaid electronic health record program has paid more than $2.5 billion to physicians and hospitals in incentive payments for all of 2011, with December contributing to the steep growth curve.
The final 2011 data won’t be in until early March because physicians can register and attest in the Medicare program until the end of February to receive payment for what is considered calendar 2011, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. States also can take weeks to submit their final Medicaid incentive data.
-----

Tech investor: Computers could replace doctors

January 11, 2012 — 11:44am ET | By Dan Bowman
Could machines and algorithms eventually replace doctors, leading to a more automated healthcare process? It's possible, says Silicon Valley investor Vinod Khosla in a TechCrunch post this week, who argues that computers likely will mature from providing bionic assistance and second opinions for doctors to giving first opinions and referrals.
According to Khosla, general checkups for common maladies should take 15 minutes at a maximum, something he said a computer algorithm easily could handle "as well as the median doctor."
"Physically having to go to your doctor's office makes sense for the most part, except that a lot of the basic tests are either visual ... or auditory," Khosla said. "Most of the time a [doctor algorithm] could at least advise you when it is worth visiting based on your normal body functions, your current indications, and your locality's current infections and other symptom trends."
-----

More Patient Data Risks, Lawsuits Predicted In 2012

The new year promises to bring greater patient data risks as healthcare organizations increase their use of mobile technology and social media sites.
By Nicole Lewis,  InformationWeek
January 09, 2012
According to experts in healthcare law and information privacy and security, healthcare IT managers can expect to see more patient data breaches in 2012, along with more lawsuits filed by patients as the availability of patient information exchanged over social media sites and mobile devices grows.
These conclusions, published by ID Experts, offer a glimpse into what health CIOs can expect as they seek to protect patient data during a year that promises more of the same challenges they faced last year. In 2011, the healthcare industry had its fair share of patient data breaches, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) stepped up its oversight activities, handing down fines to healthcare organizations that were lax in meeting their patient privacy obligations.
-----

Telemedicine as Talent Strategy

Philip Betbeze, for HealthLeaders Media , January 10, 2012

This article appears in the December 2011 issue of HealthLeaders magazine.
Until recently, Don Chomsky, MD, cardiologist, spent a lot of valuable work time on the road. In addition to his regular work at Saint Thomas Heart in Nashville, he covers appointments for patients at two outreach clinics in rural Tennessee, which takes up about six days—more than a quarter—of his work month. Both are about an hour and a half drive one-way from Nashville, and that’s when traffic is good.
“I drove out here last Friday, and my hour-and-a-half drive was four hours because of a wreck on the highway,” he says, speaking of his once weekly trip to Winchester, TN. “For us there’s a lot of dead time with these commutes where we could be doing something much more useful than sitting in a car.”
Indeed. Multiply Chomsky’s “windshield time” by dozens more physicians at Saint Thomas or by several hundred at Ascension Health, of which Saint Thomas is a part, and we’re talking about real money and real waste. That’s why hospitals and health systems are getting increasingly sophisticated about ways to reduce waste and improve profitability while at the same time preserving what patients like about their healthcare. If it sounds experimental, that’s because some of this work is, indeed, new.
-----

Q&A: Farzad Mostashari on Meaningful Use, Privacy

Margaret Dick Tocknell, for HealthLeaders Media , January 10, 2012

Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM, is the national coordinator for health information technology at the Department of Health and Human Services. In a telephone interview with HealthLeaders Media Mostashari spoke about the challenges his office faces, the importance of patients being involved in their care, and how his office is working to protect patient medical records.
HLM:  What are three toughest challenges you plan to tackle in 2012?
Mostashari: Adoption of meaningful use, information exchange and interoperability, and maintaining privacy and security. We want 2012 to be a huge year for meaningful use. I think doctors, hospitals, and vendors are geared up. It will be an enormous year for providers who qualify for the incentive, but more importantly to start to establish the information foundation for delivering care that is inconceivably better in all ways—higher quality, safer, more patient-centered, and more coordinated.
-----

Profit Warning Shreds WedMD Stock Price

Online medical content vendor WebMD Health Corp. issued a profit warning and announced it’s looking for a new CEO, and maybe a buyer. Its stock price was subsequently down 28 percent in morning trading on Jan. 10.
Wayne Gattinella has resigned as CEO and president, with CFO/COO Anthony Vuolo serving as interim CEO. WebMD announced it had discussions in late 2011 with several potential buyers but has terminated the talks.
-----

Google Flu Trends a good warning system for EDs

January 10, 2012 — 11:40am ET | By Dan Bowman
Why wait for a slow, clunky government report to learn about illness trends in your area when, with the click of a mouse, you can do so in near real time? That's the gist of a report published this week in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, which concludes that targeted Internet traffic can serve as a good predictor of patient activity for hospitals.
Specifically, the study looks at use of Google's Flu Trends (GFT) over a 21-month period, from Jan. 2009 through Oct. 2010 in Baltimore. Johns Hopkins researchers, led by Richard Rothman, MD, PhD, found that the number of searches for flu information on the Internet spiked simultaneously with the number of cases of children who presented with flu-like symptoms at Hopkins' pediatric ED.
-----

7 health data privacy and security trends to track in 2012

January 06, 2012 | Rick Kam and Christine Arevalo, director of healthcare identity management, ID Experts
Happy Leap Year! We’re jumping into a challenging 12 months — lawsuits are up, budgets are down, and advances in technology have made protecting medical data a whole lot harder. Our list of top trends in 2012 reveals difficulties ahead; read and proceed with caution.
1. More data breaches, bigger impact. The new benchmark study by the Ponemon Institute finds that the frequency of data breaches in healthcare organizations surveyed has increased by 32 percent since 2010, with hospitals and healthcare providers averaging four data breaches a year. These data breaches cost the healthcare industry an estimated $6.5 billion.
On a per-provider basis, the cost of data breaches is also high. The average economic impact of a data breach increased 10 percent from last year to $2.2 million, the Ponemon study found. Data breaches also lead to diminished reputation, lower productivity, and loss of patient goodwill—all of which may contribute to patient churn, at an average lifetime value of more than $113,000 per patient.
-----

10 Hospital Technologies to Watch Carefully

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , January 9, 2012

Just in case some hospital chiefs have millions in the coffers to spend but can't figure out what to buy, a report by the ECRI Institute lists ten high-priced gadgets and systems that bear at least a look.
"Hospitals have very high pressure on their budgets right now," says Diane Robertson, director of ECRI's health technology assessment information service which helped prepare "Top 10 C-Suite Watch List: Hospital Technology Issues for 2012."
"We see them paying more attention to clinical evidence, and more attention to incorporating processes to rationalize their decision-making on where they are going to allocate resources...understanding all the issues, so they're not unaware of something they need to be aware of," she says.
-----

7 market trends for telemedicine

January 06, 2012 | Healthcare IT News Staff
WASHINGTON – Jonathan Linkous, CEO of the American Telemedicine Association, has shared seven market trends that will shape telemedicine and telehealth in the immediate future. These trends represent major changes from the existing norm, creating new challenges and opportunities for the industry, he says.
1. A Shift away from reimbursement models
Reimbursement has been the Holy Grail for telemedicine in America but the rapid growth of managed care, Accountable Care Organizations and medical homes are changing the way we pay for telemedicine services. One quarter of all Americans – 73 million patients – are now covered under a managed care health insurance program. With this shift, the focus of decision-making is gradually turning to local and regional healthcare decision makers.
-----

5 reasons medical device data is vital to the success of EHRs

January 05, 2012 | Michelle McNickle, Web Content Producer
IT experts argue daily that more simple interfaces and paper-like workflows are the keys to the success of EHRs. And although that may be true, Shahid Shah, software analyst and author of the blog The Healthcare IT Guy, believes medical device data not only fills the void often found in these systems, but can also ensure their adoption in the months and years to come.
Shah offers five reasons why medical device data is vital to the success of EHRs.
1. EHRs are just a vehicle, not the end goal. Although 2011 was all about meaningful use, said Shah, most don’t realize MU is all about data – not EHRs. For example, the government needs data for cost comparisons, healthcare professionals need it for treatment research and chart management, and patients need it for choosing the right provider and treatment. “Right now, we know Medicare and Medicaid are paying more than 50 percent of the nation’s healthcare costs, but doing so as ‘fees for services’ without regard to what treatments, medications, or tests really work,” he said. According to him, the evidence-based research that goes into figuring out what works and what doesn’t is the foundation of what has been known as Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER), which is being rebranded as Patient Centered Research. “The government needs tons of data for CER, which is designed to inform healthcare decisions by providing evidence on the effectiveness, benefits, and harms of different treatment options."
-----

IT demand goes global

Many markets outside U.S. posting strong growth
By Joseph Conn
Posted: January 9, 2012 - 12:01 am ET
The healthcare information technology market in the U.S. is booming, but it's much the same story elsewhere.
According to a December report from IDC Health Insights, Framingham, Mass., total global healthcare IT spending is projected to top $97 billion in 2015, up 27% from 2011. The estimates include spending on hardware, software and services for providers and payers. In comparison, U.S. purchases will surpass $54 billion in 2015, up 29%.
The health IT buying binge in the U.S. should come as no surprise. In 2009, Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act with about $29 billion for health IT incentive programs. According to the CMS, total federal incentive payments jumped 48% between October and November last year to $1.8 billion.
-----

Federal health care IT spending set to grow

By Angela Petty, Published: January 9

With money tight, congressional appropriators rarely insist that agencies spend money. Yet the omnibus spending bill passed Dec. 17 approved $100 million for a joint Pentagon and Department of Veterans Affairs effort to develop digital medical records — even though they missed deadlines for requesting the money.
A recent Deltek report projects that the federal health care information technology market will grow from $4.5 billion in 2011 to $6.5 billion by 2016, far surpassing overall federal IT growth estimates.
Rising health care costs, the aging population and anticipated cost reductions and efficiency gains promise to make health care IT one of only a few bright spots in federal spending over the next few years.
-----

Watson is out of Jeopardy!

Artificial Intelligence is a favourite theme of technologists and science fiction. IBM has come uncannily close to AI with its Watson supercomputer - and health could be one of the first areas to benefit. Jon Hoeksma reports.
29 December 2011
Imagine a doctor’s consulting room in the near future. A hard-pressed doctor is unsure of a difficult diagnosis. She is pretty sure what is wrong with her patient, but would like some support.
She picks up her iPhone6 from a stack of papers and asks calls a trusted colleague for a second opinion, describing the patient’s symptoms.
Her remote colleague listens carefully, asks some useful questions, and very quickly offers a view on the most likely diagnosis. A pretty routine second opinion; except that the remote clinical expert on the phone is the world’s smartest computer.
-----

Triage device supports first responders

16 December 2011   Rebecca Todd
A new mobile triaging device has been launched that transmits patient data directly to hospital control centres during individual and mass casualty events.
Safe Triage Pro was developed by Honeywell Intelligent Life Care and Safe Patient Systems. It was successfully trialled by the West Midlands Air Ambulance Service.
Safe Patient Systems medical director David Morgan said the development was sparked by the director of the air ambulance service, when he complained that paper patient records were often not filled out or not put into a database for weeks after an emergency call-out.
-----

Looking to a health e-future

Health portals with connected devices are almost common these days; smart clothes and monitoring chips that become part of the body may be the future. Shanna Crispin reports.
2 January 2012
What did you get the health conscious person in your life for Christmas? A monitor to feed information about their exercise levels or blood pressure into an online portal?
These have become increasingly common (and particularly popular with a certain kind of chart-obsessed executive). But researchers are working on far more futuristic ideas – from smart clothes to avatars that can support rehab patients.
-----
Monday, January 09, 2012

2012: Time for Action on Health Privacy

by Deven McGraw
Consumers and patients support the electronic sharing of health information and are eager to experience the benefits of widespread adoption and use of electronic health records. Yet a substantial majority continue to express significant concerns regarding the impact of e-health on the privacy and security of their health information. According to a recent survey by the Markle Foundation, the privacy of health information is a significant concern for the American public and doctors who serve them.
Building and maintaining public trust in health IT and health information sharing will be critical to leveraging their benefits to improve individual and population health. The rhetoric from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT and HHS has been consistently strong on the importance of respecting the confidentiality of health information; however, with a few exceptions, the pattern has been too much talk and not enough action.
-----

Cloud computing in healthcare: the question is not if, but when

January 9, 2012 — 9:50am ET | By Ken Terry
From the big technology vendors--Microsoft, Google, IBM, AT&T, et al.--comes the drumbeat of exhortations: "to the cloud, to the cloud!" Some industries have already decided that that's the way to go. But healthcare providers aren't so sure, according to a recent report by KLAS Research.
When you examine their reasons, however, it appears that the only question about cloud computing in healthcare is not if, but when.
In a survey that ran the gamut from small clinics to 1,000-bed hospitals, KLAS found that 55 percent of the respondents already had something in the cloud, whether it was clinical applications, storage, e-mail, or picture archiving and communication systems. Nearly a quarter of this group used remotely served electronic health records.
-----

Enjoy!
David.

Friday, January 20, 2012

It Really Looks Like The US Is On A Bit Of An E-Health Roll. Here Is A Summary Of What Was Done In 2011.

The following review appeared a few days ago

12 Months of Health IT: A Year of Momentous Progress

January 10, 2012 | Farzad Mostashari, MD, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
ONC earned its nickname as the “Office of No Christmas” during the 2009 Holiday season roughly two years ago when we, along with our colleagues at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), announced the proposed regulations to govern the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs (EHR Incentive programs) established under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). CMS’s proposed rule outlined provisions governing the EHR Incentive programs, including defining the central concept of “meaningful use” of EHR technology.
At the same time, ONC issued an interim final regulation that set initial standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for EHR technology. In the closing months of 2009, ONC also issued a flurry of funding opportunities to support health information technology adoption, information exchange, and the workforce needed to make this important Recovery Act program succeed.
A year later, by the 2010 holiday season, vendors, newly accredited certification bodies, and a few vanguard providers were gearing up for the official launch of the EHR Incentive programs, which opened for registration on January 3, 2011. What has happened in the 12 months since then?
I would like to highlight ten of this year’s most notable developments in the world of health information technology and ONC.
1. January: Launch of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Over the past 12 months, the concept of Meaningful Use has thoroughly permeated EHR development and implementation. The marketplace of certified products has grown quickly, interest in Meaningful Use among providers and hospitals is sky-high, and the pace of incentive payments has continued to accelerate.
  • Products: As of today more than 1,500 EHRs—about  1,000 ambulatory and 500 inpatient EHRs— have been certified by one of the six private-sector Authorized Testing and Certification Bodies selected by ONC, up from 300 certified products at the start of the year.  To date, 672 vendors have products certified under the program (60% of those vendors are small businesses with 50 or fewer employees), which is more than a three-fold increase in the number of vendors with certified products at the beginning of the year.  This growth fosters competition, innovation, and gives providers more choices than ever before.
  • Eligible Professionals and Hospitals: As we conclude the year, participation in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs is strong and growing at an impressive rate. As of November 30, 2011, 154,362 eligible professionals and 2,868 eligible hospitals have registered with either of the EHR Incentive Programs. According to a recent survey, more than two-thirds of hospital CIOs and CEOs identified achieving Meaningful Use as their top IT priority. More than half of office-based physicians say they intend to apply for the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs.
More than 20,000 eligible professionals and 1,200 hospitals have already received their incentive payments from CMS, totaling $1.8 billion so far, with December shaping up to be the biggest month yet.
2. February: Launch of DIRECT
The Direct Project provides a simple, secure, standards-based way for providers and other participants to send encrypted health information directly to trusted recipients over the internet—a kind of “health email.” During 2011, the Direct Project went from publishing its first set of consensus-approved specifications to testing in pilots, to initial production implementation across vendor and state boundaries.
The Direct Project’s 200+ committed members reached consensus on two key specifications enabling secure directed transport of health information. Thirteen pilot communities across the nation put these specifications into practice, and successfully exercised and validated them. Technology and service vendors began offering production Direct capabilities to statewide health information exchanges, state and federal agencies, and health care professionals, with more than 35 vendors having implemented Direct by the end of 2011. Larger communities using Direct in production started to emerge, with Direct as part of the core strategy of 40 state HIE grantees.
3. March: The National Quality Strategy
In March, HHS released the National Quality Strategy for health improvement, the first effort to create a national framework to help guide local, state, and national efforts to improve the quality care in the United States. The National Quality Strategy recognizes health information technology as critical to improving the quality of care, improving health outcomes, and ultimately reducing the costs. Putting the National Quality Strategy into action, HHS subsequently launched two key initiatives that set specific national targets:
  • Partnership for Patients, which is working with a wide variety of private and public stakeholders to make hospital care safer by reducing hospital acquired conditions by 40%, and improving care transitions upon release from the hospital so that readmissions are reduced by 20%.
  • Million Hearts campaign, which is a public-private initiative to prevent 1 million heart attacks and strokes over the next five years by improving access to care and increasing adherence with basic preventive medicine.
The evidence shows that, health information technology, along with delivery system improvements, will be a key ingredient to the success of these campaigns and other efforts around the country to improve health outcomes. A study published this September in the New England Journal of Medicine which looked at diabetes care in Cleveland found:
  • 51% of the patients being treated by physicians practices using an EHR received care that met all endorsed standards of diabetes care compared to 7% of patients treated by non-EHR practices
  • 44% of patients treated by EHR practices met at least four out of five outcome standards for diabetes compared to 16% of patients in paper-based practices with similar outcomes
4. April: Launch of the Standards “Summer Camp”
At the April HIT Standards Committee meeting, Doug Fridsma, Director of the Office of Standards and Interoperability and Acting Chief Science Officer, kicked off the Summer of Standards—an accelerated effort to support the Stage 2 standards and certification requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs.
These activities took place within the Standards and Interoperability Forums. One of the major accomplishments of summer camp was reaching consensus around Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (CDA): This summer, 150 committed members of the Standards and Interoperability Framework Transitions of Care Initiative—including providers, technology vendors, informaticists, standards institutions, and federal agencies—worked toward consensus on a single standard for transmitting care transitions data. After more than 1,000 balloted issues were resolved, the standard was approved, and subsequently recommended by the HIT Standards Committee for inclusion in the Stage 2 standards and certification requirements for the Medicare and Medicaid Incentive Programs.
For the first time in our country’s history there is a single, broadly-supported electronic data standard for patient care transitions!
Catch up with the other six initiatives here:
The author’s tag line and original link to the blog is here.
 Farzad Mostashari, MD is National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. This post appeared at Health IT Buzz.
Now while I am sure Farzad if guilty of talking his own book just a little it is clear things are really off and rolling. The Direct Project and the Standard for patient care transitions are major steps forward and done in the way I believe things should be done. (Not having unimplemented and un-agreed specifications just issued ex-cathedra as we seem to be seeing right now!)
The full blog is worth a careful read so you can compare and contrast and see how things could be so much different and possibly so much better!
David.

Lots Of Fun Weekend Reading - 33 Submissions Now Posted!

Go here to download and browse:
Enjoy
David.

Tiger Balm Teams - Providing Relief from the Pain of Standards Processes


Tiger Balm Teams, NEHTA's new remedy that works where standards processes hurt. A name that has been trusted by governments to provide specifications for over 6 years.


With their unique formulation specially selected from NEHTA architects and industry experts which are proven safe and compliant, Tiger Balm Teams' standardisation processes and soothing relief from meetings and more meetings restore balance to modern standards processes, and give a sense of wellness to NEHTA and DOHA.

Suitable for young and old standards, the authority we’re familiar with has also diversified into a range of PCEHR-specific solutions like B2B Gateways, Repository Interfaces and Basic Vendor Repository that address varying needs of the different methods of access.

With apologies to www.tigerbalm.com

-----

A little Friday comment! Love the e-Health logo on the tin! Thanks to the anonymous author!


David.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

HCN Joins The NEHTA Supporting Club. Too Little To Late Or A Smart Move?

This release appeared a little while ago. The release is dated 19 Jan, 2012.

Medical Director Launches eHealth Initiatives

Health Communication Network (HCN), the market leading clinical software vendor, has today announced the release of 3 key components relating to Australia’s eHealth strategy.  Health Identifiers (IHI, HPI-I, and HPI-O) have been introduced in Medical Director and PracSoft, and Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) handling for discharge summaries and specialist letters (reports) have also been released to market with Medical Director.  This is a strong indicator of HCN’s commitment to the National eHealth strategy with regard to improving clinical outcomes at the point of care.
This release enables over 5,700 medical practices nationally to start using Health Identifiers and is a big win for the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA) and DoHA in driving the National eHealth Strategy to fruition. John Frost, HCN CEO, comments:  “HCN is committed to the government’s eHealth strategy and will ensure that those aspects of eHealth that are important to our customers and their patients are delivered.  Over coming years the increased use of IHIs will, we expect, have a profoundly positive effect on reducing the incidence of misidentification which today is a major cause of medical misadventure.  I’m proud that HCN, through our market leading products, can assist clinicians in more reliably matching discharge summaries and specialist letters with the correct patient file through the automatic use of IHIs.  Further, as the acute sector increasingly adopts the use of CDA Discharge Summaries our GP and specialist doctor customers will finally receive one of the most frequently requested benefits of eHealth.” 
These new features will improve the communication of important clinical information between doctors without disruption to the clinical workflow and will not be a burden for practice managers.  “We understand the challenges placed on modern general practitioners and specialists and strive to ensure that the eHealth initiatives delivered via Medical Director and other HCN products add value to the clinicians and practices overall without impost on an already time poor profession; patient care is not compromised by labour intensive or time consuming tasks associated with eHealth initiatives.” says John Frost.
About CDA:
Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) is an XML-based mark-up standard for specifying the encoding, structure and semantics of clinical documents for exchange.  Medical Director now accepts CDA-based Discharge Summaries and Specialist letters (reports).
About Health Identifiers
The Federal, state and territory governments have developed a national Healthcare Identifiers Service (HI Service) which will uniquely identify healthcare providers and individuals who seek healthcare. The HI Service will give individuals and healthcare providers confidence that the right health information is associated with the right individual at the point of care. 
The HI Service aims to improve the security and efficient management of an individual’s personal health information with strict privacy laws governing how these numbers are used.  Health Identifiers are a very important factor that could drive significant improvements in patient safety.
I leave it to the reader to assess what this release actually means.
I would note that Medical Director does not seem to be able to SEND anything based on CDA (referrals etc.) and that somehow CDA based referrals, lab reports and so on seem not to be mentioned as being received either.
Please let me know what you think all this means - when HCN Products don’t seem to be sending any CDA documents to the PCEHR. Just how does that fit with the present National Strategy? Or have I misread?
This comment is really odd.
"This release enables over 5,700 medical practices nationally to start using Health Identifiers and is a big win for the National eHealth Transition Authority (NEHTA) and DoHA in driving the National eHealth Strategy to fruition."
Is this an admission of a response to NEHTA / DoHA pressure or just rather odd phrasing? 
I would note the release does not mention the PCEHR. Maybe all this is to follow?

David.

Now Here Is An Interesting Survey Of Clinician Attitudes To Technology. Australian Doctors Included!

The following popped up very late last year. It is of special interest as one of the countries covered was good old OZ!

Eight-country survey shows worldwide agreement on Health IT benefits, but a generational divide does exist.

Overview

While the majority of doctors are convinced that “Connected Health” brings benefits, a surprising amount of doctors are skeptical of the associated healthcare IT benefits. Research among more than 3,700 doctors in eight countries reveals ripe opportunities to accelerate a broad national Connected Health initiative, according to a new survey from Accenture. The survey illuminates prevailing perceptions (based on demographics and geography) among doctors today over the future of Connected Health. While the survey illustrates similarities and differences in perceptions of healthcare IT, the findings clearly show that the broadest, fastest path to integrated, effective health practices requires outreach, education and changing mindsets among some doctors, especially those over 50 who are not actively using healthcare IT.
Many doctors, however, remain unconvinced that healthcare technologies, such as electronic medical records (EMR) and health information exchanges (HIE), will improve patient outcomes, improve access to services or reduce unneeded procedures. Interestingly, these are the benefits most often touted for widespread adoption of EMR and HIE and, therefore, this disconnect creates barriers to fully realizing the benefits of a truly Connected Health ecosystem.
December 22, 2011

Background

Connected Health is an approach to healthcare delivery that leverages the systematic application of healthcare IT to facilitate the accessing and sharing of information, as well as subsequent analysis of health data across healthcare systems. It is using knowledge and technology in new ways for more effective, efficient and affordable healthcare. The future of healthcare entails systems and infrastructures that enable information management, analysis and sharing—it is the engine of what Accenture calls Insight Driven Health.
High-level benefits of Connected Health include:
  • Better access to quality data for clinical research
  • Improved coordination of care across care settings and service boundaries
  • Improved health outcomes for patients
Accenture conducted this survey in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Singapore, Spain and the United States from August to September 2011. Accenture surveyed approximately 500 doctors per country (200 in Singapore) on their attitudes towards and perceived benefits of healthcare IT. This survey is one part of a comprehensive Connected Health study that will be published in early 2012. The study incorporates results from this doctor survey as well as input from interviews with more than 150 industry experts, and 10 case studies of successful Connected Health implementations.

Analysis

It was surprising that a high percentage of doctors either did not know of or did not associate a positive impact on the use of EMR and HIE with some of the main selling points of a Connected Health system. Among the key findings:
·         Almost half of doctors surveyed, 44 percent, are not convinced that healthcare IT will help reduce the number of unnecessary interventions and procedures.
·         Forty-three percent of doctors are not convinced that healthcare IT systems will result in increased speed of access to health services.
·         Almost 40 percent are not convinced that the use of healthcare IT will bring improved outcomes for patients.
The Accenture survey found that doctors under 50 are more likely to believe that healthcare IT has a positive impact across a wide range of perceived benefits, including improved health outcomes for patients, increased speed of access to health services and reductions in medical errors. More than 72 percent of doctors under 50 think EMR and HIE will improve care coordination across settings and service boundaries. And, 73 percent believe these technologies will offer better access to quality data for clinical research. These numbers vary, however, for doctors over 50—only 65 percent and 68 percent respectively perceive the same benefits.

Recommendations

Despite all eight countries being at a relatively early stage of the Connected Health journey, there is evidence that doctors truly desire change. These findings clearly signal ways that governments and healthcare organizations can speed progress toward Connected Health. There is work ahead to fully convince physicians that healthcare IT will ensure better patient care, lower healthcare costs and make them more effective and efficient.
Building organizational development and change management capabilities are crucial steps for success to help convince the majority of doctors of the value of healthcare IT, and thus drive its progress. Strategic change management is among the six dynamics that must be fully executed for a country to realize the full benefits of Connected Health. The soon-to-be-released study will explore all six of these dynamics in detail.
Clinician involvement—especially among doctors—is also a central theme of those organizations and systems that are succeeding in the development of Connected Health. This is more than simple communication. It requires doctors’ active involvement in planning change and guiding its implementation with their peers and colleagues.
Change must be manageable. Where top-down, whole-system re-engineering has been attempted at a national level, there have been as many failures as successes. When policymakers and health leaders have identified achievable targets and tangible, medium-term outcomes, rapid progress is possible.
Lots more here:
A .pdf with graphics of the findings and country comparisons is found here:
Looking at the Australian results it is clear that - at least in Aug/Sep last year there was not a strong conviction among doctors that Connected Health was going to make a huge difference.
It is interesting to see what was considered important in Australia and that - as usual - the important things were not obviously provided by the PCEHR.
It is also interesting to see the more use was made of systems to more valuable they were seen to be.
The .pdf is well worth a browse as are the lessons seen in the summary above!
David.