Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Friday, February 21, 2014

The Irish Seem To Have Some Good And Not So Good Ideas On E-Health - Interesting Read.

This appeared a little while ago.

Identifying Ireland’s eHealth Needs

Friday, 31 January 2014 13:13 Paul Mulholland
PAUL MULHOLLAND examines the Government’s new eHealth strategy and Health Identifiers Bill
Given the increasing importance of information technology within the health sector, the lack of a national IT health strategy has been seen as a fundamental gap that has prevented the Department of Health and the HSE from running a fully modernised service.
Also, while the Government had been working on a Health Information Bill for the last number of years, which would facilitate the much heralded unique patient identifiers, there was little sign that this legislation was being progressed. These two factors combined meant that Ireland was far from leading the way in the area of eHealth.
Finally, however, things have changed.
Before the end of last year, Health Minister James Reilly published the eHealth Strategy for Ireland, as well as the Health Identifiers Bill 2013 and announced the recruitment of a Chief Information Officer (CIO) for the health service.
eHealth, as defined in the strategy, involves the integration of all information and knowledge sources involved in the delivery of healthcare via information technology-based systems, including patients and their records.
Examples of standard eHealth systems include electronic prescribing (ePrescribing) whereby patients can order repeat prescriptions online, online patient scheduling and referral systems and telehealthcare systems whereby patients with for example, diabetes or heart failure, can manage their own healthcare from the home environment. eHealth systems also include newer technologies such as ambient assistive living systems, robotic surgical systems and body-worn sensor devices.
The new strategy states that the development of a coherent eHealth strategy is an important strand of tackling the budgetary and demographic challenges that are facing the health service.
The strategy admits that the healthcare sector has lagged behind other sectors in adapting information technology.
“I think that eHealth has the potential to transform health systems, very much in the same way that ICT has transformed many other sectors such as finance and travel,” Director of Health Information Directorate in HIQA, Professor Jane Grimson, told IMN.
“It really does have the potential to support a healthcare system that is genuinely patient-centred that delivers personalised healthcare, tailored to the individual and delivered to the most appropriate place, whether it is in the community, or the acute sector or wherever. So eHealth has that real potential, and I think that the strategy recognises its transformational and disruptive potential. That is a firm statement of intent that Ireland is going down the eHealth route. We were rather late coming to the table, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. Because we really have an opportunity to learn from what has happened in other countries, and what hasn’t worked. I don’t think it is necessarily a bad thing to be a later adopter of this technology.”
Prof Grimson points to the UK as an example of a country who got it wrong by trying to do too much, too soon. The rollout of the National Summary Care Record was hampered as companies involved in the tendering process felt the implementation timeframe was too ambitious, while local trusts complained of a lack of consultation on the project.
The British Medical Association asked the UK Government to suspend the roll-out of the database in March 2010 as it was an “imperfect system” being rushed into service prematurely, with accusations that data had been uploaded without giving patients the opportunity to opt out a primary concern.
“Denmark had a similar problem. It tried to deliver a national  electronic health record in three years or something, and they only realised after a couple of years that this was far too complicated,” Prof Grimson explained.
“It really comes down to the fact that eHealth is very much a transformative, disruptive technology and if you start introducing electronic records, which is usually the ultimate goal of most national eHealth programmes, to have ultimately some kind of shared record, it is major change. It is every bit as major a change as having online bookings for airlines and so on, it is a very significant change, and if you ignore that whole change management piece you will run into difficulties.”
Under the strategy, a new entity called “eHealth Ireland” will be established, initially on an administrative basis within the System Reform Group (SRG) of the HSE. Over time, as the HSE is dismantled, this new organisation will be formed as an independent entity within a new institutional framework for shared services for the health sector as a whole.
eHealth Ireland will be headed up by a new CIO who will work closely with all of the key business organisations within the health service, in order to drive forward the eHealth strategy and ensure that key IT systems are implemented on time and to budget.
Lots more detail here:
This paragraph especially caught my eye.
“Prof Grimson welcomed the formation of the authority to lead the strategy as it will pull different work strands together and fix the current fragmented system. She cites Canada Health Infoway and the National eHealth Transition Authority in Australia as two of the best examples of similar eHealth organisations.”
It seems to me the good Professor needs to read a little less of the public propaganda from these two organisations and ask a few at the coal face just how both these two organisations have been experienced. She may just find the actual outcomes don’t quite fit the press releases!
This on the other had seems pretty good!
“Priority projects include: The development of appropriate health informatics skills and/National Health Identifier Infrastructure; ePrescribing Systems; online referrals and scheduling; telehealthcare – particularly relating to the management of chronic diseases; development of patient summary records; online access to health information; and a national patient portal.”
As also does the actual CIO appointment and a sensible Board to run the effort. The final plan will allow us to form a firm view on how well this may all play out!
David.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Was The DoH Cunning Or Not With The Design Of The PCEHR? The U.K. Seems To Have Got Itself Into A Bit Of A Mess.

This appeared a day or so ago.

'Big Brother' database will grab children's health records but parents are being kept in the dark

Leaflets about the scheme don't say children's records will be harvested

Doctor fears the data grab will 'undermine trust' in the medical profession

PUBLISHED:| UPDATED:
Children's medical records will be automatically uploaded to the controversial new ‘Big Brother’ NHS database – but parents have not been told.
The records of some ten million youngsters in England will be taken from GP surgery computers this spring to be part of the care.data project.
Leaflets about the scheme contain no mention that children’s records will be ‘extracted’. It is only revealed in NHS guides for patients and GPs on the internet.
Last night MPs and doctors said it was ‘highly irresponsible’ not to specify that children’s information would be uploaded.
More here:
You can read the back story to this story here:

Care.data: a row waiting to happen

NHS England has sent directions to the Health and Social Care Information Centre to start collecting and linking primary care data to Hospital Episode Statistics. EHI news editor Rebecca Todd takes a look back at the creation of the care.data programme and the concerns many have about its implications for patient privacy.
30 January 2014
Clever use of data can help the NHS make better decisions about planning services and reducing waste, as well as devising new treatments with a direct effect on patient care.
The real 'scandal' of data use, some would argue, is the chronic underuse of the wealth of patient data locked up in various systems in order to benefit the health system as a whole.
NHS England wants to create a new national database of identifiable patient data pulled from hospitals, GPs, social care, community care and other areas. This will be stored in the ‘safe haven’ of the Health and Social Care Information Centre, where it will be linked to create new Care Episode Statistics.
NHS England says this new data set will help to determine where the NHS needs to invest and to highlight where excellent care is being delivered and where there may be local problems.
However, the information held in care.data will not just be available to the NHS. Identifiable data – what the programme calls ‘red’ data – will be released under “civil emergencies” legislation and Section 251 orders from the health secretary.
Some partially anonymised data – ‘amber’ data – will be released to any organisation that wants to use it for the benefit of patients, including universities and private companies. And some large datasets – ‘green’ data will be published.
It’s the amber data that has caused most controversy to date. Data will be pseudonymised – or have some of its identifiers replaced with placeholders called ‘pseudonyms’ - before release.
But there is a risk that it could be re-identified if combined with other datasets in a technique known as a ‘jigsaw attack’; although the proponents of the programme say this will not happen, because contracts with researchers will ban it.
NHS England chief data officer Geraint Lewis argues that the emphasis should be on what applicants want to use the data for, and not on making moral judgements about who these applicants happen to be.
However, others see a very clear distinction between the idea of patient data being used by the NHS and it being used by others, even if those operating “in the public interest” or working “for the benefit of patients.”
Others are simply nervous about the creation of a massive central database of identifiable patient information and the consequential risk of their data being lost, leaked or released to organisations which already hold significant amounts of data on England’s citizens.
A scandal erupts
An increasingly strident campaign against care.data is now underway, partly because NHS England and other national bodies have done a poor job of making the case for the programme to clinicians, patients, privacy campaigners, and others.
The idea of care.data seems to have first appeared in print in NHS England’s initial planning guidance for the health service in December 2012. However, the fact that a large new GP dataset was to be “requested” from practices came out of the blue for joint chairman of the BMA and RCGP's joint IT committee, Dr Paul Cundy.
The committee quickly requested a meeting with NHS England’s national director of patients and information, Tim Kelsey.
This appears to be the first time the national commissioning board engaged with this key GP group about the proposals, even though GPs are the data controllers for the information they hold; and so are responsible for making sure patients are informed about the use that is being made of it.
Eventually, a publicity campaign and an opportunity for patients to opt-out was agreed. But the £1m leaflet drop that is now underway as part of the campaign has been severely criticised for failing to adequately explain what is planned (it does not even mention care.data by name) and for not including an opt-out form.
This is particularly surprising considering the uproar that derailed the NHS Summary Care Record programme for many years.
The SCR was another 'good idea' that involved extracting a key clinical dataset from GP practices to be held on the national data Spine, from where it could be viewed by staff treating patients who otherwise had no medical records with them.
However, the SCR was seen as a top-down dictate, a part of the National Programme for IT in the NHS that wanted to create the first, national database of patient records, for limited clinical benefit. Consequently, it became engulfed in a row about whether patients should be able to opt in or opt out that it is only just starting to recover from.
There is a lot more here:
As I read about all this annoyance in the UK it occurred to me that the PCEHR was aiming to build a similar database - probably over a longer time period by having the doctors upload the information voluntarily for their patients.
One way or another both Governments are trying to get a large population data-base to data mine but I suspect the previous Government was pretty cunning is saying ours was was personally controlled while having the same objective and avoiding the opt-out approach now being used - very controversially - in the UK.
Very cunning indeed politically but unless PCEHR adoption gets a lot better the UK will win the race to having a useable database.
Nothing is ever easy in all this.
David.

Minister Dutton's Speech To CEDA In Brisbane Yesterday. E-Health Record Is "Very Important"!

This speech was given yesterday.

Address to CEDA Conference

The Minister for Health, Peter Dutton, Address to CEDA Conference.

Page last updated: 19 February 2014

The link is here:

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/health-mediarel-yr2014-dutton001a.htm?OpenDocument&yr=2014&mth=02

Most interesting in the speech which was mainly one of generalities and pointing out how expensive healthcare had become and how Labor had messed up we had this:

"Medicare is an integral part of Australian society and I am determined to modernise and strengthen a 30 year old system – so that it can up to date and to work with evolving technology, including the very important e-health record and ever-increasing health needs."

One can only wonder what on earth that means!

David

It Look Like Health Is In For A Real Shake Up. Here Is All You Need To Know To Appreciate They Don’t Have a Clue!

This appeared today.

Medicare plans: Health Minister Peter Dutton flags overhaul, calls for discussion on GP co-payments

February 20, 2014
Health Minister Peter Dutton has flagged an overhaul of Medicare, suggesting Australians who can afford it should pay more for their healthcare.
Mr Dutton has used a major speech to declare he wants there to be a frank, fearless and far-reaching discussion about the health system.
He argued the system is unsustainable and he wants to "modernise and strengthen" Medicare.
He has told the ABC's 7.30 program there needs to be discussion around co-payments.
"Commonwealth and state governments contribute 92 cents in the dollar for those treated in the public system," he said.
"Therefore, one important job of the Abbott Government is to grow the opportunity for those Australians who can afford to do so to contribute to their own healthcare costs.
"If they have a means to contribute to their own healthcare, we should be embarking on a discussion about how that payment model will work.
“One important job of the Abbott Government is to grow the opportunity for those Australians who can afford to do so to contribute to their own healthcare costs. “
Peter Dutton
"I want to make sure that for argument's sake we have a discussion about you or me on reasonable incomes [and] whether we should expect to pay nothing when we go to a doctor."
There has recently been debate over a proposal to charge patients $6 to visit their general practitioner.
Lots more here:
The video makes just riveting viewing to see just how ill formed and vague the Minister’s plan is.
On ABC Radio this morning we also had this:

Abbott flags major changes to health services

Thursday 20 February 2014 7:44AM
The Abbott Government is paving the way for major changes to health services, including a possible co-payment for GP visits.
Health Minister Peter Dutton has called for a 'fearless and far reaching debate' on health spending, which he says is 'unsustainable.'
Labor is warning this means the end of universal health care in Australia.

Guests

Dr. John Dwyer
Professor of Medicine at the University of NSW and founder of the The Australian Health Care Reform Alliance
Here is the link:
Here Prof. Dwyer makes the obvious point that maybe we should reform an inefficient system to save money rather than just charge people more. The point that 29% of health costs is direct out of pocket expenses at present means we are  all paying a fair bit already.
To date all the reform  efforts (Lib and Labor) have been pretty ineffective and poorly implemented. Maybe some serious hard work towards real reform should come before asking people to pay more?
Maybe we could even have a go at getting e-Health right?
I fear we are going to see some pretty ill-considered and unwise outcomes from all this.
David.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Discussion Of Just What Will Happen In The Budget Regarding Health And Health IT Continues As Expected! Senate Enquiry Report Released Today.

This appeared a few days ago.

Senate committee to grill Abbott adviser over proposal for $6 fee to visit GPs

Date February 11, 2014

Dan Harrison

Health and Indigenous Affairs Correspondent

The former adviser to Tony Abbott who proposed a $6 fee to visit the doctor will be grilled by a Senate committee.
Terry Barnes, who worked for Mr Abbott when he was health minister in the Howard government, has been invited to appear before the Senate committee on the government's Commission of Audit next Tuesday.
Mr Barnes proposed the idea of a $6 co-payment to see a GP in a submission to the Commission of Audit made on behalf of the Australian Centre for Health Research, a private health think tank.
Mr Barnes calculates his proposal would generate $750 million in savings over four years through reducing unnecessary visits to the doctor and reducing incentives for doctors to overservice.
He has also suggested it may be necessary to introduce fees for emergency department presentations, to deter people from going to hospital with problems more appropriately treated by a GP.
Mr Barnes said he was ''more than happy'' to answer the committee's questions and hoped to appear in Canberra in person.
Lots more here:
 You will be able to get a transcript next week from here:
Also we had this appear:

Comment: Age of entitlement ends

03 Feb 2014
Treasurer Joe Hockey has decreed everyone must do the heavy lifting and Australia's "Age of Entitlement" is over, but does this only apply to those outside the palace?
While the nation's collective belt tightening must generate savings across every ministerial portfolio, including health and aged care, Hockey's stern paternalistic messaging on ABC Radio did not outline measures to ensure the parliament and politicians themselves bear some of the pain.
With the fiscally challenged sectors of the economy including health, aged care, education, farming defence and manufacturing, and Hockey's determination that providing life support for them is too expensive, long-term sustaining strategies are urgently required.
Slash and burn operations may save short term costs but they will realise long term expenses without alternative strategic pathways. In the January February edition of Hospital and AgedCare, I wrote an editorial suggesting that the fiscal challenges facing hospital and aged care would be helped if politicians and the bureauracy ensured greater value. It follows below.
In December last year, the treasurer trumped all previous blame games to reveal a $17 billion budget blowout, as he ripped off the previously applied bandaids off a wounded if not crippled economy.
Lots more here:
At least some of the populous is starting to get restless with all this talk.

Hundreds rally against Medicare reforms and fees for GP visits

Many Australians will not be able to afford to see a doctor and will cost the health system more, says Tanya Plibersek
  • Australian Associated Press
  • theguardian.com,
Hundreds of people gathered outside Sydney’s Town Hall on Saturday to protest against any moves to water down Medicare and introduce patient payments to see a bulk-billing GP.
Waving banners reading “Stop Abbott”, “Save Medicare” and “Free Universal Health Care”, the protesters called for the government to rule out any changes to Medicare.
Deputy opposition leader Tanya Plibersek paid tribute to the introduction of the health system, which celebrated its 30th anniversary this month.
“Before Medicare, millions of Australians used to be bankrupted,” she said.
“Medical bills were the highest cause of bankruptcy in Australia, as they still are today in the US.”
She called for the government to rule out any introduction of a GP co-payment, which would require patients to pay a suggested $6 fee for each consultation.
The rally took place just weeks after prime minister Tony Abbott dismissed as nothing more than a scare campaign claims the government was planning to introduce a fee.
Lots more here:

It looks like next week will be interesting with the Commission of Audit Senate Enquiry and just what regarding the health sector might be discussed.

Commission Of Audit Senate Enquiry - Interim Report.

Listened to the webcast of a good deal of the Senate Enquiry. The discussion was pretty predictable but with one or two contributions being fun to listen to. Most especially there was an ASU representative who said the process for the Commission of Audit was flawed because it reported to Government and that if the Government decided to form a Budget including some of the recommendations it was undemocratic. Given Parliament has to pass the Budget I struggled with that one!

You can read a transcript of the whole day here:

http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22committees%2Fcommsen%2Fb7627224-c545-4ff0-83ea-e4356fc92ead%2F0000%22
 
Here is the interim Committee Report - released today.

http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Abbott_Governments_Commission_of_Audit/Interim_Report/~/media/Committees/Senate/committee/abbott_cttee/Interim_Report/report.ashx

The report divided on political lines as expected!





We will also start to see the various organisations put in their submission for the May Budget - many of those will be asking for concessions which we can be pretty sure simply won’t happen this year!


David.

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Now A Few Have Tried To Use It, We Are Discovering What A Mess The PCEHR Is! Old Saying Confirmed

There is an old saying that the proof of the pudding is in the eating. To support that view we have this that popped up today.

‘Garbled and confused’: trust in e-health dives

18th Feb 2014
THE personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) is garbling patient information GPs upload, creating confusing and potentially misleading records, an e-health expert has warned.
The latest criticism of the billion-dollar scheme from former National Electronic Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) chief clinical lead, Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, comes as the health sector awaits the release of the review ordered by Health Minister Peter Dutton late last year.
A de-identified patient record entered into the PCEHR by Dr Haikerwal, and supplied to MO, shows that the reverse chronological order of visits was jumbled up and appeared in the e-health record in random order.
For the PCEHR to be usable, particularly for complex patients with multiple comorbidities, the most recent information must be displayed first with the patient’s history listed chronologically in reverse order, Dr Haikerwal said.
“The way it is rendered into the PCEHR is like a blender. You can see in the PCEHR view it becomes a mishmash both in terms of content — alphabetical or not — and date,” he said.
“Although it is there and may be better than nothing, it is only just better than nothing.”
Information labelled ‘past’ and ‘current’ in the original patient history also became mixed up in the PCEHR.
“Depending which CIS platform you use, it is likely to render differently, but each appears to have its own quirks,” said  Dr Haikerwal.
Lots more here:
Although Dr Haikerwal goes on later to say “Flawed though it is, there is much that can be rescued from the PCEHR. But this is a pretty stark depiction of what the flaw is in the most central document in the whole system,” it is clear he has major concerns and great frustration with the way all this has and is being delivered.
What we are hearing, from a key sponsor of the idea of the PCEHR, is a clear recognition that the PCEHR has been a disastrous mess and the more it is used the more confusing (and clearly dangerous) the whole system has become.
It seems to me we are at real risk of doing some real harm to real patients sometime very soon with this system.
The clear implication is that the PCEHR - as it presently exists - should now be taken down and, if it is to continue, a total rethink is undertaken of how information is managed and displayed before it is allowed to be accessed again. To just muddle on is just absurd on the basis of what Dr Haikerwal is saying. That information of this quality is fed from vendor systems to the PCEHR and then available for display shows how poor the overall conception and implementation of both practice systems and the central hub are.
Of course a total rethink of who manages, plans, governs and leads this program - which surely can’t now be seen as the initial PCEHR - is also critically needed.
Additionally some clarity as to just what the 'new' PCEHR is for, who it is for and what it is intended to do might be a help in the re-design!
David.

Abbott Government's Commission Of Audit Hearing Today

The Hearing is on today - and has a heavy health focus.

Hearing goes until 4pm.

Go here are select the Watch Parliament tab to watch.

http://www.aph.gov.au/

Sure to be some fun!

David.

Monday, February 17, 2014

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 17th February, 2014.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

Lots of fun this week in the politics of e-Health, web sites and the PCEHR review. Sadly again no news on the PCEHR Review but it looks like Medicare Locals are due for a name change and a change in roles.
Other that these topics it seems pretty clear the Junior Health Minister still has a few questions to answer about the way she is managing her portfolio - and if ABC Insiders can be believed the issue may run for another week or so. Wonder how it will all play out.
-----

Farce: Minister has PCEHR report … but Dept can’t find a copy

news The Department of Health has rejected a Freedom of Information request for a report reviewing the Federal Government’s troubled Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records project, claiming that it does not have a copy of the document, despite the fact that Health Minister Peter Dutton announced in December that he had received it.
The project was initially funded in the 2010 Federal Budget to the tune of $466.7 million after years of health industry and technology experts calling for development and national leadership in e-health and health identifier technology to better tie together patients’ records and achieve clinical outcomes. The project is overseen by the Department of Health in coalition with the National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA).
However, in July the Government revealed it had failed to meet it initial 500,000 target for adoption of the system, with only close to 400,000 Australians using the system at that point.
-----

Health Minister Peter Dutton backs less bureaucrats, more frontline GPs

LABOR’S “dud’’ Medicare Locals will be rebadged and redesigned after GPs complained that the $1.8 billion bureaucracy is failing to deliver real services to patients.
Senior government sources have revealed that a review into the system has confirmed some sites underperforming. Staff working at Medicare Locals also hate the name, complaining patients think they can claim Medicare refund there or actually see a doctor.
But the review has come with a hefty $550,000 price tag according to tender documents obtained by the Sunday Telegraph. Despite the contract running for just three months, it comes with a $550,000 contract for accounting services awarded to Deloitte.
Medicare Locals were established by the Rudd-Gillard government and were designed to better integrate GP and primate health care services. Unlike GP superclinics, they are not a shopfront with doctors.
-----
Pharmacy Daily 10 February 2014.

eRx now with QR codes

Doctors using medical programmes such as Medical Director, Genie, Zedmed, Practix, Totalcare and Houston can now print QR codes on patients’ scripts.
The scripts allow patients with the eRx Express smartphone app to scan the codes to submit the script online to their pharmacy, pre-ordering their medication from their local pharmacy by scheduling a pick up time and date so patients no longer need to line up at the pharmacy to get scripts filled.
The app connects to eRx’s eScripts network, which allows 15,500 GPs and 4,300 pharmacies to send prescriptions and dispensing data securely.
-----

Health, education sectors hungry for IT skills

Telehealth, remote diagnosis and fast broadband driving job growth in these sectors
Employers in healthcare and education have been the hungriest for ICT skills over the past three months, according to the latest Peoplebank Salary Survey.
Both sectors have been the key driers of hiring between November and January, with health sector demand rising month-on-month from August last year.
“The sheer number of new e-health initiatives – in PCEHR, telehealth, remote diagnosis and more – make healthcare one of Australia’s strongest areas of ICT investment, alongside the education market where developments including fast broadband are fuelling innovation,” said Peoplebank, CEO Peter Acheson.
-----

Healthcare and education sectors hungry for Australian IT skills

Summary: The Peoplebank Salary Survey shows the healthcare and education sectors are fuelling growth in IT employment.
By Aimee Chanthadavong | February 11, 2014 -- 03:58 GMT (14:58 AEST)
IT employment within Australia is off to a strong start this year, thanks to the healthcare and education sectors, according to the Peoplebank Salary Survey.
The survey shows that employers in healthcare and education have been the hungriest for IT skills, particularly over the November to January period. Healthcare sector demand has been rising month on month from August 2013, peaking at 127.12 points in January, while the demand from the education sector has risen since October to 123.55 points. The points system considers May 2013 as a baseline that is set to 100.
Peoplebank CEO Peter Acheson said the healthcare and education sectors' investment in new initiatives is stimulating the demand.
-----

Question: openEHR and FHIR

Posted on February 11, 2014 by Grahame Grieve
Question from Heather Leslie:
How to get more cooperation bw FHIR resource devt & clinically verified openEHR archetypes to shared data roadmap for future?
Questions in response:
Well, my immediate question is, “what does clinically verified mean?” Is there any archetypes that are clinically verified, and how would we know? The openEHR eco-system has several different versions of most archetypes, each with different clinical stake holders involved to a variable degree. Which, if any of them, are clinical verified , and by who? And what does “verified” mean – other than that it’s being used (happily?) in practice?
I’m sure I’ll get vigorous response to these questions on the openEHR blogs – I’ll link to responses from here.
-----

Careless minister Fiona Nash and Government harmed by blunder over chief of staff

  • LAURIE OAKES
  • Herald Sun
  • February 15, 2014 12:00AM
WHEN government adviser Alastair Furnival walked the plank yesterday, conflict of interest was not the real problem.
The cause of his fall from grace was a minister who treated Parliament with contempt.
Assistant Health Minister Fiona Nash knew Furnival, her chief-of-staff, had been a partner with his wife, Tracey Cain, in a lobbying firm that had in the past acted for companies — specifically food companies — in areas covered by her portfolio.
She knew — or should have known — that he’d held shares in the firm Australian Public Affairs, when he took the job in her office.
Yet, under questioning by Labor Senate leader Penny Wong on Tuesday, Nash blithely asserted: “There is no connection whatsoever between my chief-of-staff and the company Australian Public Affairs.” That was simply untrue. And the Prime Minister’s office knew it was untrue because full details of Furnival’s involvement with the company had been canvassed in the vetting process before his appointment.
-----

Top 4 data privacy tips

Identify key data you hold about an individual and appoint a privacy officer, advises HDS CTO
There is less than a month to go before the Australian Privacy Act amendments come into effect on 12 March with serious fines for companies and individuals who breach the Act.
Under the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Bill 2012, Australian Privacy Commissioner Timothy Pilgrim will be able to seek civil penalties of up to $340,000 for individuals and up to $1.7 million for companies in the case of a serious privacy breach.
Pilgrim has publicly stated that he will not be taking a “softly, softly” approach when it comes to privacy investigations.
Audits of Australian government agencies, tax file number recipients, credit reporting agencies and credit providers will be extended to include private sector companies.
These audits will determine if companies are handling personal information in accordance with the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).
-----

Better access to SNOMED CT-AU and AMT resources

Created on Wednesday, 12 February 2014
License holders accessing the National Clinical Terminology and Information Service (NCTIS) will find it quicker and easier to obtain information following the migration of the NCTIS website to the NEHTA public website. The new single entry point means stakeholders will have better access to SNOMED CT-AU and AMT resources and associated information on licensing, guides and tools.
The NCTIS is responsible for managing, developing and distributing terminology to support the eHealth requirements of the Australian healthcare community.  
SNOMED CT-AU and the AMT are available for eHealth software developers to use in their Australian products. Licensing arrangements are administered by NEHTA. Access to release files is available to those holding both of these current license agreements:
  • SNOMED CT Affiliate License Agreement; and
  • Australian National Terminology Release Licence Agreement to provide access to extensions and derivatives supplied by NEHTA.
-----

Games help burn and stroke victims get moving

Paediatric motion analysis facility cuts the number of surgical interventions by up to 35 per cent
Game technology is being used to help burn and stroke patients in Queensland improve their mobility and quality of life. It has even assisted a young paraplegic man to walk again.
A research team led by Dr Robyn Grote at the new Queensland Motion Analysis Centre at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital are introducing the technology to burns and stroke patients as well as those with acquired neurological disorders and complex mobility problems.
The Motion Analysis Centre provides a three-dimensional view of a patient, providing the most precise profile of gait and movement.
-----

Pharmacy health checks will spark ‘turf war’: AMA

10 February, 2014 Nick O'Donoghue
Giving the Pharmacy Guild of Australia the green light to provide in-store health checks will spark a 'turf war' with GPs, the AMA warns.
Dr Mason Stevenson, an AMA Queensland GP representative, hit out at the Guild’s pre-Budget submission, released yesterday, which called for funding for in-store screening services and health checks, to reduce the burden on GPs and lower health costs.
Speaking to the Bundaberg News Mail, Dr Stevenson hit out at the proposal, saying that pharmacists were not qualified to perform health checks or diagnose.
-----

Chemists told to back off

A LEADING Sunshine Coast doctor has criticised pharmacists for "pretending to be doctors".
The attack comes in light of the Pharmacy Guild's national proposal to offer annual health checks through pharmacies to measure weight and check blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol of patients.
A Pharmacy Guild spokesman said the proposal was being assessed by the Department of Health and hoped it would be implemented this year.
The spokesman said the proposal stipulated health checks would only be carried out at pharmacies with consultancy rooms.
-----

Get Real Health Launches New Partnership to Serve Australian Healthcare Sector through Telstra

Rockville, MD (PRWEB) February 12, 2014
Get Real Health is proud to announce its new partnership with Telstra, Australia’s leading telecommunications and information services company, to serve the rapidly growing healthcare IT market in Australia. Telstra will be the exclusive reseller in Australia of Get Real Health’s award-winning InstantPHR™ patient engagement platform.
“Get Real Health is thrilled to be collaborating with Telstra to bring InstantPHR-powered connected care and patient engagement solutions to Australia,” said Robin Wiener, Get Real Health president and founding partner. “Telstra’s strengths in connectivity and secure data storage, combined with their vision to build an eHealth ecosystem, makes this an extremely exciting opportunity for us.”
-----

Mobile phone use safe, investigation concludes

12th Feb 2014
MOBILE phone use poses no risk to health, an 11-year investigation has concluded.
UK researchers from the independent Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research program yesterday their final findings which summarised 31 individual research projects published in close to 60 published papers. 
They found no evidence that exposure to base station emissions during pregnancy increased the risk of developing cancer in early childhood and no evidence of a link between mobile phone use and increased risk of leukaemia.
-----

Forged scripts an increasing problem

11 February, 2014 Nick O'Donoghue
Prescription fraud is becoming an increasing problem that pharmacists must be vigilant of, Lenette Mullen, Pharmacy Guild of Australia WA branch president believes.
Following the fourteenth global alert issued by the WA Health Department in the last 12 months relating to stolen prescription pads, Ms Mullen warned that the problem was on the rise.
“We know those forging scripts are becoming more sophisticated, and the forgeries of harder to detect,” she told The West Australian.
-----

Aussies turn universal thinking on its head

A RESEARCH team led by Australian astronomers has discovered the oldest star known, in work that will cause a stir in the international scientific community and force a rethink about the evolution of the universe.
The team, led by Australian National University scientist Stefan Keller and including Nobel laureate Brian Schmidt, used the new SkyMapper optical telescope at Siding Spring in northern NSW to detect a star 6000 light years away.
The star was a member of the second generation of stars that formed after the Big Bang that marked the birth of the cosmos 13.7 billion years ago.
-----
Enjoy!
David.