Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Friday, October 09, 2009

Report and Resource Watch – Week of 5, October, 2009

Just an occasional post when I come upon a few interesting reports and resources that are worth a download or browse. This week we have a few.

First we have:

Women With Diabetes at Increased Risk for Irregular Heart Rhythm

Kaiser Permanente study finds association between diabetes and atrial fibrillation

PORTLAND, Ore., Sept. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- Diabetes increases by 26 percent the likelihood that women will develop atrial fibrillation (AF), a potentially dangerous irregular heart rhythm that can lead to stroke, heart failure, and chronic fatigue. These are the findings of a new Kaiser Permanente study, published in the October issue of Diabetes Care, a journal of the American Diabetes Association.

While other studies have found that patients with diabetes are more likely to have AF, this is the first large study--involving nearly 35,000 Kaiser Permanente patients over the course of seven years--to isolate the effect of diabetes and determine that it is an independent risk factor for women.

"The most important finding from our study is that women with diabetes have an increased risk of developing this abnormal heart rhythm," said the study's lead author, Greg Nichols, PhD, investigator at the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research in Portland, Ore. "Men with diabetes are also at higher risk, but the association between the two conditions is not as strong. For men, obesity and high blood pressure are bigger risk factors from diabetes."

Much more here:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/women-with-diabetes-at-increased-risk-for-irregular-heart-rhythm-62289407.html

The article abstract is found here:

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/32/10/1851.abstract

Again the Kaiser Computer Systems are making useful contributions to clinical knowledge.

Second we have:

Australia - Towards national indicators of safety and quality in health care

This report sets out recommendations for a set of 55 national indicators of safety and quality in health care. The report concludes the National Indicators Project, a major project funded by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (the Commission) and undertaken by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) in close consultation with the Commission and a wide range of clinical and other stakeholders.

Authored by AIHW.

Published 29 September 2009; ISBN-13 978 1 74024 961 4; AIHW cat. no. HSE 75; 286pp.; INTERNET ONLY

More here:

http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/10792

There is much more detail and downloads available from the link above. These indicators, once finalised, will doubtless be used to shape a ‘pay for performance’ program in Australia.

Third we have:

Dutch health system retains ‘Best in Europe’ crown

Published: Tuesday 29 September 2009

The Netherlands has the best healthcare system in Europe, according to the annual Euro Consumer Index. Dutch healthcare was top of the list for the second year running, this time with an even bigger margin of victory.

Background:

The annual Euro Health Consumer Index compares health services in 33 European countries based on patient rights, e-health, waiting times, outcomes, range of services offered, and access to medicines.

Last year, the Netherlands edged out Denmark to take the title of Europe's best healthcare system (EurActiv 14/11/08), while Austria came out on top in 2007 (EurActiv 1/10/07).

Greater information sharing and patient choice have been highlighted by proponents of cross-border healthcare in Europe. The European Parliament passed a directive in April which paves the way for greater patient mobility (EurActiv 24/4/09)

In second place was Denmark, which performed strongest in providing patients with access to information and enforcing patient rights, but lost marks for having longer waiting times. While Sweden fared best in the analysis of health outcomes, its e-health investment was weaker. The Netherlands' performance was broadly strong in all categories.

Much more here:

http://www.euractiv.com/en/health/dutch-health-system-retains-best-europe-crown/article-185837

The link between e-Health and the better health systems is explicitly drawn.

The report can be found here:

http://www.healthpowerhouse.com/files/Report-EHCI-2009-090925-final-with-cover.pdf

Fourth we have:

Docs Miss Test Results -- Even With Alerts

Communication woes still plague medical system, researchers find

Posted September 28, 2009

MONDAY, Sept. 28 (HealthDay News) -- Even an advanced, computerized medical-record system with alerts cannot guarantee that patients will receive timely follow-up care when imaging tests turn up signs of trouble, new research suggests.

"Our findings suggest that an electronic medical record that facilitates transmission and availability of critical imaging results to the health care provider through either automated notification or direct access of primary report does not eliminate the problem of missed test results even when one or more health care providers read the results," write the authors of a study in the Sept. 28 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.

According to the authors, communication breakdowns are blamed in cases when doctors don't follow-up on abnormal test results. In some cases, all the doctors involved in a patient's care don't receive information about, say, a lung mass.

More here:

http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/09/28/docs-miss-test-results----even-with-alerts.html

The article abstract is available here:

http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/169/17/1578?home

Fifth we have:

EHR Implementation is a Journey, Not a Destination

Carrie Vaughan, for HealthLeaders Media, September 29, 2009

If you have seen one physician practice, you have seen one physician practice. I often hear that phrase when talking with healthcare executives about best practices and lessons learned from successful electronic health record implementations. Health systems, hospitals, and clinics all have their own unique personality that is shaped by their geographic and organizational culture. That means there is no set formula to guarantee a successful EHR implementation. Organizations must find the path that works best for them.

A recent report by healthcare market research firm IDC Health Insights analyzed how two Norwegian hospitals—St. Olavs Hospital in Trondheim and Ahus Hospital in Oslo—successfully adopted digital technologies. The study, "Best practices: Norway's hospital evolution—A tale of two cities," concluded that there wasn't a single template for successful health IT implementations. Both projects were full replacements of aging facilities, but they used different methods to realize the vision of a digital hospital.

For example, St Olavs chose a single-vendor and an outsourced solution, whereas, Ahus worked with multiple vendors, retained some of its legacy systems, and managed its IT transformation internally. Even though Ahus was able to adopt more mature technology, since it began its implementation two years later than St. Olavs' project, both systems are now fully operational and their digital transformations deemed a success by their staff members and communities.

More here:

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/print/content/239750/topic/WS_HLM2_TEC/EHR-Implementation-is-a-Journey-Not-a-Destination.html

A useful report – the link is in the text.

Sixth we have:

Health IT prevents heart attacks?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 2:00 pm

Kaiser Permanente is pushing a study in today’s American Journal of Managed Care as proof that health IT saves lives.

It proves to me my pill regimen may be keeping me alive.

In the study 68,560 people with diabetes or heart disease were given a combination of generic statins and hypertension drugs, resulting in 1,271 fewer heart attacks and strokes.

But what’s the health IT angle?

  • KP HealthConnect, the insurer’s Electronic Health Record system, was used to identify the patients at risk.
  • The findings validate a computer-created model predicting that the bundled drugs would cut heart attack and stroke in the target population by 71%.
  • Kaiser researchers conducted the study.

Much more here:

http://healthcare.zdnet.com/?p=2777

Link in the text. Kaiser strikes again!

Lastly we have:

Electronic medical records give early warning of domestic abuse

Posted by Elizabeth Cooney September 29, 2009 07:09 PM

Boston researchers reported today a novel use for electronic medical records -- using data in patient records, they say they were able to identify likely victims of domestic abuse an average of two years before a diagnosis was actually made.

Ben Reis, Dr. Isaac Kohane, and Dr. Kenneth Mandl of Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School studied six years of hospital admissions and emergency visits for patients over 18 years old. Based on the patient's history, including injuries and assaults, they determined whether patients met a definition of domestic abuse. Then they looked at actual diagnoses of domestic abuse.

"Our model predicted abuse two years before it appeared on medical records," Reis said in an interview. The article appears online in the British Medical Journal.

The risk factors linked to a future domestic abuse diagnosis differed between men and women. For women, the red flags were trips to the hospital to treat injuries, poisoning, and alcoholism. For men, depression and psychosis were associated with the greatest risk.

The researchers developed a visual display that could become part of a patient's electronic health record. The work is not ready to be implemented, they said, but the model could form the basis for an early warning system that would help busy doctors decide which patients need further screening and perhaps intervention.

"This is not a diagnosis but a screening support system," Reis said.

Their hope is to bring the wealth of information about a patient to the forefront during a doctor-patient encounter encumbered by competing demands. They plan to study other health problems, from diabetes to depression, that might lead to what they call "predictive medicine."

More here:

http://www.boston.com/news/health/blog/2009/09/post_31.html

The full report is here:

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/sep29_1/b3677

Good stuff!

Enjoy!

David.

Thursday, October 08, 2009

International News Extras For the Week (05/10/2009).

Again there has been just a heap of stuff arrive this week.

First we have:

Thursday, September 24, 2009

HHS Holds Keys to Next Generation of Health Information Privacy

by Deven McGraw and Harley Geiger

While lawmakers continue to debate health reform, health IT already is poised to be a major factor in changing how health care is delivered. Recognizing health IT's potential to enhance efficiency and quality of care, Congress made a substantial taxpayer investment in health IT earlier this year through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Congress also recognized that digitized health records pose privacy issues that, if left unresolved, can profoundly undermine patient trust in the health care system. Consequently, ARRA devotes significant attention to strengthening the privacy and security of health information.

However, stronger laws are not enough. Effective implementation -- including education, outreach and oversight -- will be needed to embed better privacy and security practices throughout the health care system, particularly as we move into the age of digital health records.

To realize the promise of health IT, we need a new generation of health privacy that can be accomplished best with proactive and consistent privacy leadership from HHS. Specifically, HHS should:

  • Capitalize on opportunities provided in ARRA to strengthen and more effectively implement and enforce privacy and security protections for digital health information;
  • Ensure effective communication and coordination on privacy policy among its subagencies and offices, as well as with other federal agencies; and
  • Serve as an ongoing resource for stakeholders on the law and on effective privacy and security practices.

Much more here (including links):

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Perspectives/2009/HHS-Holds-Keys-to-Next-Generation-of-Health-Privacy.aspx

This is an important review of the trends that need to be watched as the US moves forward. Worth a browse.

Second we have:

On the Watch for Flu and More
Health Agencies Create Post-Vaccine Monitoring Systems

Associated Press

Monday, September 28, 2009

More than 3,000 people a day have a heart attack. If you're one of them the day after your swine flu shot, will you worry that the vaccine was to blame and not the more likely culprit, all those burgers and fries?

The government's system to track possible side effects of mass flu vaccinations will begin next month, aimed at detecting any rare but real problems quickly, and explaining the inevitable coincidences that are sure to cause some false alarms.

"Every day, bad things happen to people. When you vaccinate a lot of people in a short period of time, some of those things are going to happen to some people by chance alone," said Daniel Salmon, a vaccine safety specialist at the Department of Health and Human Services.

Health authorities hope to vaccinate more than half of the population in just a few months against swine flu, which doctors call the 2009 H1N1 strain. Vaccination is voluntary, and how many get it depends partly on confidence in its safety.

"The recurring question is, 'How do we know it's safe?' " said Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic.

Enter the intense new monitoring. On top of routine vaccine tracking, there are these government-sponsored projects:

-- Harvard Medical School scientists are linking large insurance databases that cover as many as 50 million people with vaccination registries around the country for real-time checks of whether people see a doctor in the weeks after a flu shot and why. The huge numbers make it possible to quickly compare rates of complaints among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, said the project leader, Richard Platt, Harvard's population medicine chief.

-- Johns Hopkins University will direct e-mails to at least 100,000 vaccine recipients to track how they're feeling, including the smaller complaints that wouldn't prompt a doctor visit. If anything seems connected, researchers can call to follow up with detailed questions.

-- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is preparing take-home cards that tell vaccine recipients how to report any suspected side effects to the nation's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system.

More here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092702913.html?hpid%3Dmoreheadlines&sub=AR

I wonder what is in place in Australia? I have not heard of an approach like this to pro-actively see how we are going. Anyone know?

Third we have:

Zakaria and Meyerson: How to Fix Health IT

By Sammy Zakaria and David A. Meyerson
Thursday, September 17, 2009 7:22 PM

President Obama's address to Congress on health-care reform overlooked one of the most important issues: the poor state of health information technology.

Last week, a 62 year old woman, whom we will call Mrs. B, came into our office complaining of shortness of breath. She also mentioned a history of severe hypertension, coronary artery disease and dialysis-dependent kidney failure. We discovered that she had been admitted several times in the past year to five different area hospitals. Beyond these bare facts, we had no other information. We had no reliable details of her recent testing, treatment or medications. Also, she could not recall the names or dosages of her sixteen pills, and she knew that she was severely allergic to a certain heart medicine, but she couldn't remember its name, either. We were understandably reluctant to prescribe new medications or therapies without obtaining her recent records.

Mrs. B's situation is all too common. Information is fragmented and not readily accessible. Even the most prepared patient carrying copies of previous medical records is handicapped by the difficulty in deciphering handwriting and medical notations. It is common for duplicate tests to be ordered, increasing health-care costs by perhaps 15 percent or more.

The comments continue here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/17/AR2009091703734.html

I would say the diagnosis is right – but the solution of going to a single standardised EMR to solve interoperation issues is a trifle naive I think. Where ever there has been a situation like what it proposed here it has met substantial resistance – everywhere from HealthSMART to the UK NHS. (I know I have commented on this before (last week) – but have given the article a second read and thought)

Fourth we have:

Achieving paperless health care

Shift to electronic medical records is transforming patient care by improving safety, efficiency and lowering costs

By GUY KOVNER

THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Published: Saturday, September 26, 2009 at 3:00 a.m.

Last Modified: Saturday, September 26, 2009 at 11:45 p.m.

The bar code on a Kaiser Permanente patient’s wristband may seem the epitome of impersonal medicine, but it’s part of a digital revolution aimed at cutting costs, boosting efficiency — and promoting health.

WHAT IS EMR?

Electronic medical records, known as EMR, is a computerized system that provides instant and complete patient information to medical offices, emergency rooms, hospitals and other health facilities.

• A system typically includes patient history, diagnoses, X-rays and other images, test results and communications with health care providers.

• Patient files can be accessed 24/7, expediting diagnosis and treatment of acute illnesses, management of chronic conditions and reducing duplicate testing.

If the magnetic reading by a nurse doesn’t match the bar code on a drug about to be administered at Kaiser Medical Center in Santa Rosa, an alert will sound, intended to avoid the kind of medication mixup that nearly killed actor Dennis Quaid’s newborn twins in 2007.

About 7,000 Americans die every year from medication errors.

And when Dr. Steve Levenberg saw a woman with an ankle problem at his Rohnert Park office, a few computer keystrokes gave him the patient’s medical history, including lab tests and X-rays from her recent visit to an orthopedic surgeon in Sacramento.

“My laptop computer,” Levenberg said, “is a clinical tool, just like my stethoscope.”

The healing arts, as old as humankind, are rushing to pursue and refine the use of electronic medical records, known as EMR, across Sonoma County, from rural health clinics to megasystems like Kaiser.

Medicine is a relative latecomer to the digital revolution, which has transformed many endeavors — engineering, architecture, publishing, moviemaking, warfare and personal communication — over the past 30 years.

Medical record-keeping, until recently, relied on rooms full of paper files that were easily misplaced and filled with hurried, handwritten entries that could be hard to read. Electronic records hold orderly, keyboard-entered data that never leaves a hard drive and have the potential to move seamlessly from a primary care provider’s office to an emergency room or specialist’s suite.

Coinciding with the national debate over health care costs and efficiency, EMRs — which received $19 billion in economic stimulus funding — are a prescription for making health care more efficient and less costly.

Much more here :

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20090926/ARTICLES/909269945/-1/WEATHER?Title=Achieving-paperless-health-care

This is a good long article that explains where things are up to with some EMR leaders.

Fifth we have:

Orion wins Northern Ireland ECR deal

28 Sep 2009

Northern Ireland has named Orion as the winner of a procurement for a proof of concept project for a province-wide electronic care record (ECR).

The one-year deal will be to develop a new portal-based electronic health record, predominantly for use in secondary care but linking hospitals and practices, with the potential to also link social care.

Brian McKeown, head of ICT planning, commissioning and performance management with the Health and Social Care Board for Northern Ireland, said the deal was worth just under €100,000.

He said: "We want to get something up and running to pull out data from the various systems. Essentially it will be used in secondary care-unscheduled care and particularly for those with chronic conditions.”

In the proof of concept project two hospitals and two GP surgeries will be connected to an ECR, intended to be used in A&E, and for out-of-hours services.

Lots more here:

http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/5240/orion_wins_northern_ireland_ecr_deal

http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/3DE991D4F27CE0FCCC25763C0018BB49

Health sector tackles patient record access

HealthLink-Medtech stoush brings issues into the spotlight

By Rob O'Neill Auckland | Monday, 28 September, 2009

Health bodies have converged to address issues with access to patient medical records, highlighted by a dispute between to ICT vendors Medtech Global and HealthLink earlier this year.

The Ministry of Health hosted an interoperability and standards workshop this month to address the safe sharing of information, says the deputy director-general of health information, Alan Hesketh. He says the effort aims to put in place “common approaches” to the commercial arrangements for interoperability between IT systems used in the health sector.

Hesketh says the ministry’s position is two-fold: how to share information safely and privately and how to do this so the commercial terms between ICT providers do not add costs into the health system.

Members of the New Zealand Health IT Cluster, which represents health technology vendors, participated in the meeting and the cluster is taking action to put in place agreed approaches, Hesketh says. He adds that it isn’t just about Medtech and HealthLink, but also about iSoft and Orion and a host of other players.

The Health Information Strategy Advisory Committee (HISAC) is one of several groups interested in the records review. HISAC, which advises the Minister of Health on the direction of health IT, is driving to have electronic referrals between primary and secondary health providers implemented nationwide by the middle of next year, says chairman Graeme Osborne.

Osborne and Hesketh both say there is no dispute about the ownership of health records: they belong to the patient and are held in trust by health providers. Where issues get trickier is at the integration point between systems, Osborne says.

It seems clinical information sharing issues are causing a few ructions in NZ. Australia has a similar mixed base of client systems and more messaging providers so this will need to be watched.

Seventh we have:

E-health technology adopted in Radius rest homes

Monday, 28 September 2009, 1:02 pm
Press Release: Radius Residential Care

For immediate release

Monday 28th September 2009

Revolutionary new e-health technology adopted in Radius rest homes

Radius Residential Care rest homes are among the first in the country to employ a new e-health technology initiative that is revolutionizing the way doctors can access rest home patient clinical notes.

The leading edge computer technology system ‘NZHealthNet’ enables doctors to remotely link into their patients medical notes when attending rest home patient care appointments.

Doctors can easily refer to and update clinical patient notes, order laboratory tests, write referrals and print prescriptions with NZHealthNet - all without the need to carry confidential patient records during routine visits to rest homes.

“One of the main benefits of this new e-health technology is that patient safety is improved due to doctors having real time access to patient records and data. And for rest home patients the new technology will allow them all the benefits of a regular GP visit but without leaving the comfort of their own surrounds“, says Kirsten Stone, CEO Rotorua General Practice Group (RGPG) who have developed the new technology.

Radius Glenbrae Estate was the first rest home to adopt the new technology which was implemented by RGPG onsite last week. Other rest homes within the wider Rotorua region are also expected to become ‘online’ before the end of the month.

More here:

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU0909/S00727.htm

This looks like very interesting work indeed from the Shaky Isles!

Eighth we have:

September 28, 2009

E-Records Get a Big Endorsement

By STEVE LOHR

The nation’s drive toward computerized medical records is getting a push from big hospitals, which hope not only to improve patient care but to gain an edge on competitors.

And an effort to be announced on Monday by a big New York regional hospital group may be the most ambitious effort of this type yet — a sizable investment intended as a linchpin in the group’s $400 million commitment to digitize patient records throughout its system, including 13 hospitals.

North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System plans to offer its 7,000 affiliated doctors subsidies of up to $40,000 each over five years to adopt digital patient records. That would be in addition to federal support for computerizing patient records, which can total $44,000 per doctor over five years.

The federal program includes $19 billion in incentive payments to computerize patient records, as a way to improve care and curb costs. And the government initiative has been getting reinforcement from hospitals. Many are reaching out to their affiliated physicians — doctors with admitting privileges, though not employed by the hospital — offering technical help and some financial assistance to move from paper to electronic health records.

Efforts by hospital groups to assist affiliated doctors include projects at Memorial Hermann Healthcare System in Houston and Tufts Medical Center in Boston. But the size of the North Shore program appears to be in a class by itself, according to industry analysts and executives.

Big hospitals operators like North Shore, analysts say, want to use electronic health records that share data among doctors’ offices, labs and hospitals to coordinate patient care, reduce unnecessary tests and cut down on medical mistakes.

But hospitals are seeking a competitive edge, too. Digital links, analysts say, can also tighten the bonds between doctors and the hospital groups that subsidize the computerized records. In most local markets, independent physicians typically have admitting privileges at more than one nearby hospital, and so hospitals compete for doctors as well as patients.

“The North Shore-L.I.J. program is larger than other programs,” said Wes Rishel, a health technology expert at Gartner. “And it punctuates a trend of hospital groups trying to solidify and tighten relationships with physicians in their communities.”

In other words, the government-backed campaign to hasten the adoption of electronic health records has the potential not only to change how health care is delivered. It could also influence which institutions emerge as leaders in delivering care, as some local markets consolidate further.

Full article here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/technology/28records.html?_r=1&ref=health

This is a pretty considerable investment to get rolling.

Ninth we have:

Former ONC chief Kolodner announces retirement

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: September 28, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Robert Kolodner, the former head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and more recently a senior advisor to ONC, has retired from federal government service after 31 years.

More than 28 of those years were spent at the Veterans Affairs Department and the Veterans administration, where Kolodner started in 1977 and worked as a psychiatrist and in increasingly higher levels of leadership in healthcare IT. The VA's Decentralized Hospital Computer Program, later renamed VistA, was developed during that period.

More here:

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090928/REG/309289951

A true friend of Health IT – who no doubt made a big difference!

Tenth we have:

Tennessee gave doctors wrong fax number in privacy breach

Patients' private medical records faxed out of state

By Chris Echegaray
THE TENNESSEAN

The Tennessee Department of Human Services said it accidentally sent the wrong fax number to 100 medical providers across the state, leading them to erroneously send sensitive patient information to an Indiana businessman.

"We're extremely embarrassed, and we're working to remedy the situation," said Michelle Mowery Johnson, spokeswoman for DHS. "We hope it doesn't happen again."

The state sent an e-mail blast to 29,000 medical providers with the correct toll-free fax information on Monday.

The problem was first reported by The Tennessean.

More here:

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090929/NEWS01/909290346/Tennessee+gave+doctors+wrong+fax+number+in+privacy+breach

Old technology causing trouble!

Eleventh for the week we have:

Survey Highlights Power, Limits of EHR Data

HDM Breaking News, October 1, 2009

More than three-quarters of 732 surveyed executives at provider, payer and pharmaceutical organizations believe secondary use of data from electronic health records will be their organizations' greatest asset during the next five years.

But respondents also cite multiple barriers to best use of de-identified and aggregated health information. They also cite the necessity of guidelines for the usage of secondary data that is to be shared. New York consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers conducted the e-mail survey in June, getting replies from 482 providers, 136 insurers and 114 pharmaceutical/life sciences organizations.

Sixty-five percent of surveyed providers use secondary data to some degree, as do 54% of payers and 66% of pharmaceutical firms. Besides EHRs, this data can come from claims, clinical trials, laboratory and radiology reports, employers, and disease management companies. Those surveyed expect their use of such data to rapidly grow and already report such benefits as quality improvements, reduced costs, increased revenue and higher patient/member satisfaction.

More here:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/survey-39069-1.html?ET=healthdatamanagement:e1033:100325a:&st=email

More information is available at pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/secondary-health-data.jhtml

Very interesting survey indeed.

Fourth last we have:

Practice Fusion to offer ARRA-based EHR guarantee

By Joseph Conn / HITS staff writer

Posted: September 30, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Another electronic health-record system developer has joined the growing ranks of those offering a guarantee that providers using their EHRs will meet the so-called “meaningful use” critieria under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

San Francisco-based EHR developer Practice Fusion said its program provides “a guarantee that physicians using Practice Fusion's EHR will qualify for meaningful use before the economic stimulus payments begin in January 2011” and that amounts to “effectively guaranteeing payout of stimulus package money.”

Much more here:

That Federal Money is certainly having the desired effect of getting the software industry motivated etc.

It is a bit of a worry that this is a free, advertiser supported EHR. We know all about this in Australia!

Third last we have:

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Technology Incentives Not So Stimulating for Dentists

by George Lauer, iHealthBeat Features Editor

Although the HITECH Act includes dentists among the "eligible professionals" in line for federal stimulus money, some dental advocates are worried oral health might get short shrift in the push toward electronic health records.

Efforts are well under way to get medical care providers in position to earn incentives under Medicare and Medicaid if they adopt and make "meaningful use" of certified EHRs, but similar efforts on behalf of dentists are less organized and not as nationally focused, according to some dental advocates.

"Dentistry is included in the stimulus language, but in practical terms, the stimulus money for electronic records isn't going to have much of an impact on most dentists," said Paul Glassman, director of Community Oral Health at the University of the Pacific School of Dentistry in Stockton, Calif.

"There's a process going on right now, largely spearheaded by California activists, to try to figure out what can be done to change that," Glassman said. "State government, statewide foundations, academics and at the national level the ADA (American Dental Association) are trying to figure out how dentistry can have more of an impact in the move toward EHRs. We're working on answering questions like what are the barriers and what can be done about them," Glassman said.

Much more here:

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Features/2009/Technology-Incentives-Not-So-Stimulating-for-Dentists.aspx

It seems the dentists are not thrilled!

Second last we have:

Free PHR a Hit at Indiana University

HDM Breaking News, September 25, 2009

The Indiana University Health Center in Bloomington early this year began testing a free personal health record for students. The goal was to work out bugs, and offer the PHR to the incoming freshman class this fall (see healthdatamanagement.com/issues/2009_67/-28272-1.html).

Just weeks into the new semester, 3,100 of 7,200 incoming students--40% of the class--have activated a PHR and entered some data, says Pete Grogg, associate director at the health center. And half of those with a PHR are sharing data with the center as they start seeking treating. "We're very happy, we weren't quite sure what to expect," Grogg says.

.....

More information is available at Indiana.edu/~health/ and nomoreclipboard.com.

More here:

http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/PHR-39019-1.html?ET=healthdatamanagement:e1029:100325a:&st=email

This is interesting – and good news!

Last, and very usefully, we have:

Women With Diabetes at Increased Risk for Irregular Heart Rhythm

Kaiser Permanente study finds association between diabetes and atrial fibrillation

PORTLAND, Ore., Sept. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- Diabetes increases by 26 percent the likelihood that women will develop atrial fibrillation (AF), a potentially dangerous irregular heart rhythm that can lead to stroke, heart failure, and chronic fatigue. These are the findings of a new Kaiser Permanente study, published in the October issue of Diabetes Care, a journal of the American Diabetes Association.

While other studies have found that patients with diabetes are more likely to have AF, this is the first large study--involving nearly 35,000 Kaiser Permanente patients over the course of seven years--to isolate the effect of diabetes and determine that it is an independent risk factor for women.

"The most important finding from our study is that women with diabetes have an increased risk of developing this abnormal heart rhythm," said the study's lead author, Greg Nichols, PhD, investigator at the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research in Portland, Ore. "Men with diabetes are also at higher risk, but the association between the two conditions is not as strong. For men, obesity and high blood pressure are bigger risk factors from diabetes."

Much more here:

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/women-with-diabetes-at-increased-risk-for-irregular-heart-rhythm-62289407.html

There is an amazing amount happening. Enjoy!

David.

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

A Small Contribution to Openness in Australian E-Health – The Full National E-Health Strategy

With the release of the NEHTA Strategic Plan (or whatever it is) it seems time that the document which it is meant to support is also in the public domain.

You can download the full Deloittes National E-Health Strategy Document from here:

http://moreassoc.com.au/downloads/National%20E-Health%20Strategy%20REPORT%20-%20Final%20Release%20300908%20v1.pdf

The time has really come to let it fly – since everyone seems to have it other than the public - and I know the Deloittes Partner who developed it has authorised its release under FOI. Yes, I do have an e-mail from him confirming the FOI release and that he is happy people can access it!

Settle down for a good read.

David.

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

AusHealth IT Blogger Features on the Scoop from MIS Australia

The Scoop - e-Health's road to recovery

Posted: Tue 6 Oct 2009 9:39AM

e-Health is still an unhealthy industry, yet the federal government needs it to drive the NBN. So how will e-health deliver the dream? Joining The Scoop host Mark Jones is Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, clinical lead at NeHTA; Gary Cohen, chairman of iSoft; and Dr David G. More, executive director of More and Associates.

Go here to listen to or download the podcast:

http://tv.misaustralia.com/video/8454

Enjoy!

David.

A Reality Check For NEHTA.

A short piece on the NEHTA Strategic Plan was published a few days ago by Karen Dearne on the Australian IT web site.

NEHTA releases strategic plan

Karen Dearne | October 02, 2009

THE National E-Health Transition Authority has released a strategic plan repositioning itself as an implementation agency with a role well beyond its present funding to 2012.

"Since its establishment, there has been a misalignment between NEHTA's current direction and the expectations of the various stakeholder groups," the plan says. "As the organisation evolves it is important to ensure a foundation exists for 'what' it has been put in place to deliver."

NEHTA will "co-ordinate and manage the uptake of e-health systems which are of a high priority, interoperable and scalable" nationwide.

Chief executive Peter Fleming said the 2009-2012 plan outlined how NEHTA would fulfil its mission in relation to delivering the National E-Health Strategy adopted by the Council of Australian Governments last December.

The full article is here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26155170-15319,00.html

What is interesting is as of the time of typing 4 days later there are 16 comments about the article.

Pretty much all express a view of NEHTA which would make one believe I am being kind!

It will be interesting to see the NEHTA spin machine attempt strike back with some unalloyed praise!

Isn’t free speech wonderful!

Browse the comments for a belly laugh or two.

David.

Monday, October 05, 2009

The New NEHTA Strategic Plan Has More Spin Than a Tumble Drier!

What to make of this new, and presently incomplete, document?

First, we have a couple of press reactions.

First we have:

NEHTA releases strategic plan

Karen Dearne | October 02, 2009

THE National E-Health Transition Authority has released a strategic plan repositioning itself as an implementation agency with a role well beyond its present funding to 2012.

"Since its establishment, there has been a misalignment between NEHTA's current direction and the expectations of the various stakeholder groups," the plan says. "As the organisation evolves it is important to ensure a foundation exists for 'what' it has been put in place to deliver."

NEHTA will "co-ordinate and manage the uptake of e-health systems which are of a high priority, interoperable and scalable" nationwide.

Chief executive Peter Fleming said the 2009-2012 plan outlined how NEHTA would fulfil its mission in relation to delivering the National E-Health Strategy adopted by the Council of Australian Governments last December.

"We have considered our future work program based on the (Deloitte) strategy and other important work completed this year, including the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission recommendations," he said.

"As a result we have produced our plan to clearly show our stakeholders the directions we are taking to drive the adoption of e-health."

More analysis here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26155170-15306,00.html

Next we have:

NEHTA to test health ID this year

By Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet.com.au
02 October 2009 04:54 PM

The National E-Health and Transition Authority (NEHTA) has today released its strategy for 2009 to 2012, listing priorities and timelines to enable e-health, including developing an "office" model for health identifiers by December.

The strategy was formed considering the National E-Health Strategy written by Deloitte last year and the recent National Health and Hospital Reform Commission recommendations. NEHTA admitted that there had been a gap between what stakeholders expected of it and where the authority was heading. "As the organisation evolves it is important to ensure a foundation exists for 'what' the organisation has been put in place to deliver," it said.

There are four parts to the strategy: "urgently" developing the foundations to enable e-health, coordinating the progress of priority e-health solutions and progresses, accelerating adoption, and leading the progression of e-health in Australia.

The strategy will see an "office model" for the healthcare identifiers released by December this year. An early adopters release will follow in April 2010, followed by a later adopters release in July 2010.

NEHTA CEO said earlier this year that legislation to enable the use of individual health identifiers was unlikely to be passed until next year.

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/NEHTA-to-test-health-ID-this-year/0,130061733,339298878,00.htm

Third we have:

NeHTA strategic plan to unlock stalled eHealth

by James Riley

Friday, 02 October 2009

The government agency set up to assist the roll-out of electronic health services in Australia, the National eHealth Transition Authority, has released its much-anticipated strategic plan for progressing the nation's stalled eHealth initiatives.

The NeHTA plan positions the organisation as a long term implementation authority, extending the role it has so far played in standards setting. NeHTA was established by Federal, state and territory health departments and is chaired by businessman David Gonski.

While NeHTA enjoys committed funding until 2012, its strategic plan 2009-12 clearly sees a longer term role for the body during the long implementation phase – an evolution of its primary role in setting standards that created an environment conducive to eHealth adoption.

NeHTA chief executive officer Peter Fleming said the strategic plan responded to – and reflected – the goals of the Rudd Government’s national eHealth strategy released last December.

It also reviewed the recommendations of the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission – including plans to create an Individual Healthcare Identifier.

More here:

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/28172/53/

I think these can be summarised as hopeful with a touch of scepticism.

For me, all I can say is that there are certainly a few big issues raised by this plan.

Ignoring the detail the biggest issue to my mind is this Purpose Statement and then what follows:

Purpose Statement

“To lead the uptake of e-health systems of national significance;

and

To coordinate the progression and accelerate the adoption of e-health by delivering urgently needed integration infrastructure and standards for health information.” (Page 5)

But further on we find on Page 37.

“NEHTA does not currently have a role in setting governance arrangements. However, NEHTA does have a role in informing, promoting and communicating the best practices, outcomes and opportunities which are presented as a result of e‐health. Strategic initiatives relating to these areas are found in Strategic Priority 4 of NEHTA’s strategic plan.”

Translation we don’t set national e-Health Governance, we can’t work out who does and so we don’t know if we are aligned with the National E-Health Strategy or not! Our view is that this is not NEHTA’s problem it is problem of Health Ministers – and most especially the Federal Health Minister – to sort out and provide the leadership and direction to NEHTA.

The entire NEHTA document is circular in my view. What it essentially says is that Element 4 of the National E-Health Strategy has not been implemented and so we are hoping we can steal in under the radar and just get on with what we imagine is what is needed. Just who is watching, making sure the right things are being done and managing this is left totally undefined and indeed is!

Element 4 of the National E-Health Strategy reads that Australia should:

“Develop a governance regime which allows strong coordination, visibility and oversight of national e‐health work program activities.”

The details are as follows:

R 4.1

Establish a national e‐health governing board that reports to AHMC, has an independent chair and has a breadth of cross sectoral stakeholder representation.

R 4.2

Establish an independent national e‐health regulation function to implement and enforce national e‐health regulatory frameworks.

R 4.3

Establish a national e‐health entity incorporating strategy, investment management, work program execution, standards development and compliance functions.

R 4.4

Leverage NEHTA to establish the new entity and undertake a transition process to address changes to accountabilities, brand, culture, resources and operating model.

NEHTA has been unaccountable and secretive thus far, and to perpetuate this situation, ignoring advice both from the Boston Consulting Group and Deloittes about the need for much improved accountability and governance is just ridiculous. NEHTA should be planning to go no-where in the absence of appropriate national Governance as recommended by Deloittes.

The second main issue is that NEHTA seems to have actually decided it is its role to take on and undertake Element 4 on the National E-Health Strategy itself. In slightly different words, pages 25-28 make that clear.

Just who has decided this is NEHTA’s role is just not specified and I for one am unhappy about a situation where we have a clear attempt on the part of Health Ministers in an approved strategy to improve e-Health governance, and are apparently about to see that thrust utterly subverted

NEHTA does not have the Board make up or indeed the authority to do this without explicit sign-off and approval from Ministers. If they had this I am sure they would have told us so I am pretty sure they don’t.

That NEHTA is in the situation of picking and choosing what of the National Strategy it will do and ignoring the rest also does not wash with me. I don’t disagree that much of what is here needs doing – but it needs to be done on a more grounded, better led and more formal, governed and empowered basis.

It is interesting NEHTA has noted that ‘e-Health is breaking out all over’. I seriously doubt they can do much about it without a much better and totally revised governance and leadership. (Page 28)

Last we still have all this chatting on about the NEHTA IEHR with a continuing lack of any useful information on any aspect of this plan. This present document again adds zero. When are they actually going to come clean and tell us what they plan etc. It is just absurd and now it is again off until 2013 or so. They still are to get a Business Case approved – despite multiple attempts!

The good aspect of the document is that at least we know what NEHTA is supposed to be doing and can now follow their progress.

Overall this document should be seen for what it is. That is a grab for continuity and authority which is has not earned over the last 5 shambolic years of its existence. That this is the first strategic plan ever developed by NEHTA says it all. What on earth have they been doing all this time. Making it up as they go along I guess!

For the avoidance of doubt, this document is, I believe, an attempt on the part of NEHTA to legitimise it as the manager and implementer of the e-Health agenda in Australia, and to sideline the National E-Health Strategy. If I am right then they should be much more explicit about it and seek agreement from a much wider constituency than the present NEHTA Board.

If they were really wanting to implement the National E-Health Strategy the present document should have been entitled “NEHTA National E-Health Implementation Plan”! We could have done with one of those a few years ago too!

David.

Sunday, October 04, 2009

Useful and Interesting Health IT News from the Last Week – 04/10/2009.

The Australian E-Health Press provided a good serve this week. It included these:

First we have:

Electronic records create challenges: DNA

OPINION: David Weisbrot | October 03, 2009

Article from: The Australian

A PAIR of Belgian sleuths has been travelling the world, scooping up cigarette butts, serviettes and other discarded items containing traces of DNA, supposedly seeking to identify living relatives of Adolf Hitler.

Thus far, they claim to have discovered 39 genetic relatives in Austria and the US.

Journalists from some of Britain's most notorious tabloids are said to be desperate to secure a DNA sample from Prince Harry, to determine whether Prince Charles is really his father.

In the US, a railway company got into legal strife for misleading its employees about the free health checks it conducted. In fact, the company was collecting DNA samples and, in an effort to reduce sick leave and workers compensation premiums, was secretly testing those employees to see if they had a genetic predisposition to repetitive strain injury.

The remarkable advances in genetic science and technology enabling such questionable activities also hold great benefits in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of serious illnesses.

However, these rapid advances also challenge our capacity to regulate research and clinical practice in the public interest. In particular, we must ensure that we carefully protect human dignity as well as health.

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26151655-23289,00.html

This is a useful contribution to understanding the potential debates on e-Health. The last two paragraphs have it close to right I believe.

“As the ALRC recommended, any new e-health system must be established under specific legislation that expressly addresses key privacy issues.

The move to e-health is inevitable and promises better health outcomes. To ensure this happens, government must guarantee openness, transparency and plenty of public education and debate. If not, Australia's health-care system will lose this opportunity to harness itself to the electronic revolution.”

Second we have:

Microchip will help test for prostate cancer

Adam Cresswell, Health editor | October 03, 2009

Article from: The Australian

A MORE accurate test for prostate cancer could be on the horizon, after Canadian scientists claimed promising results from an electronic device sensitive enough to detect tell-tale genetic changes from a sample of blood or urine.

The device uses a microchip the size of a fingertip, fitted with nanometre-sized wires woven into a mesh that are sensitive enough to pick up signs of cancer within individual cells.

The Canadian researchers claimed their device could analyse a sample within 30 minutes, much faster than existing tests, using equipment no bigger than a BlackBerry mobile phone.

It also appears to be sensitive enough to differentiate between aggressive and more benign types of prostate cancer. If that promise is fulfilled, it could solve one of the biggest problems with current methods of detecting prostate cancer.

More here:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26158488-23289,00.html

Sounds like a useful technical advance – we certainly need an improvement on the PSA test.

Third we have:

ReferralNet selected for e-Radiology system

28 September 2009: Global Health’s (GLH) connectivity solution ReferralNet has been selected as the secure messaging platform for Geelong Medical Imaging (GMI).

GMI will use ReferralNet Messaging to send electronic radiology results and reports securely to their Clients in the Geelong region.

The recent rollout of ReferralNet by the General Practice Association of Geelong (GPAG) now makes ReferralNet the common download agent for the majority of the GPs in the area.

Streamlining the results download to one messaging provider will deliver greater efficiency to a GP practice.

According to GMI Practice Manager David Williams, the benefits of using ReferralNet were better than what other products offered.

“ReferralNet ticked all the boxes for us. With the Division’s involvement, more GPs now have the capacity to receive electronic results and reports from us. It also provides an efficient audit trail. Each message has a timestamp associated with it. With our previous messaging provider, clients had no way of tracking messages except by calling GMI. We had to regularly resend reports that have been sent, essentially adding unnecessary helpdesk service costs”, said Mr. Williams.

ReferralNet is an implementation of the vision and standards of NeHTA. Global Health is an Eligible Supplier for the PIP (Practice Incentive Program) eHealth Incentive.

More here:

http://www.global-health.com/news.php

Another example of General Practice just getting on with it – we have (at least, and in no particular order) Argus, HealthLink, Medical Objects, eClinic and Global Health all out there working with GP. (Disclosure: I have a few GLH shares)

Fourth we have:

Prescription for e-health

In a healthcare system that has its share of sickness, one sector that is approaching tip-top condition is e-health.

Georgina Swan 28 September, 2009 09:59

If there is one area where the benefits of technology reach their utmost potential in society, it is hard to argue against e-health. It has long been an area of exciting innovation and promise. It has also been chronically underfunded. But with healthcare reform at the forefront of the national agenda, the possibilities for an integrated approach to e-health makes the area rife with challenge and opportunity.

And, with the release of the final report form National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHRC) in July, the clamour around e-health has reached a crescendo. So how are healthcare providers adopting IT solutions and what technologies are central to their strategies?

“There is a significant upturn in the amount of investment in e-health,” says Microsoft health spokesperson, Dr David Dembo. “And that’s for the all the reasons that have put the healthcare’s sector back up against the wall as an industry in crisis — it’s had to innovate.

“The tipping point around the debate is the role that IT can play in healthcare’s transformation is really happening. The debate at the moment is around whether companies will achieve what they promise rather than the role of IT.”

More here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/320072/prescription_e-health?eid=-6787

Sadly this is a quite unrealistic and unfoundedly optimistic article on where we are at present. We need to remember that other than funding NEHTA the Commonwealth is yet to fund anything substantial or strategic.

Fifth we have:

'Electrode retina' boosts quest to restore sight

NEW YORK

September 28, 2009

BLINDNESS first began creeping up on Barbara Campbell when she was a teenager, and by her late 30s, her eye disease had stolen what was left of her sight.

Campbell, now 56, would have been thrilled to see something. Anything.

Now, as part of a striking experiment, she can. So far, she can detect burners on her stove, her mirror frame and whether her computer monitor is on.

She is beginning an intensive three-year research project involving electrodes surgically implanted in her eye, a camera on the bridge of her nose and a video processor strapped to her waist.

Some of the 37 other participants in the project can differentiate plates from cups, sort white socks from dark and see where people are, albeit not details about them.

''For someone who's been totally blind, this is really remarkable,'' said Andrew Mariani, a program director at the National Eye Institute.

Full article here:

http://www.theage.com.au/world/electrode-retina-boosts-quest-to-restore-sight-20090927-g7p6.html

Amazing stuff indeed!

Sixth we have:

The NBN – Flying blind?

No cost benefit analysis done by Treasury and Greens Senator questions the ability to see forward

Christina Zhou 02 October, 2009 15:30

The Australian Greens Senator for Western Australia, Scott Ludlam has questioned whether the Federal Government’s $43 billion National Broadband Network (NBN) plan is “flying blind”.

Ludlam made the comments at the most recent Senate Select Committee on the NBN while questioning the executive director of the Department of Treasury, Richard Murray.

Although Senator Ludlam acknowledged long term benefits are intangible and difficult to model, he questioned how the Government would know how much they should be investing in the project if there have been no short term calculations.

“Aren’t we flying blind though in the short term if there’s not even been an attempt made to quantify the short term…recognising that long term it’s probably impossible…” Ludlam said in an unfinished comment.

Murray was commenting that there are still many uncertainties in the Government’s project to provide a faster and more cost-effective broadband.

The Treasury director also said although there have been studies there has been no attempt by the Treasury to make a cost benefit analysis of the NBN.

He added there was too much information missing to undertake a cost benefit analysis but claimed there will be significant short and long term benefits, although he acknowledged these are also difficult to quantify.

More here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/320794/nbn_flying_blind?fp=16&fpid=1

I agree with Richard Murray on this – it is essentially unknowable just what the benefits of the NBN will be. However this does mean we should do this as inexpensively as possible and work hard to find the most cost-efficient way to proceed with this. It is not clear to me this could not be done a lot more cheaply by not duplicating the fibre already in the ground owned by Telstra, Optus and AAPT.

More on the NBN here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26134497-15306,00.html

All eyes on NBN

Amy Coopes in Sydney | September 28, 2009

THE sheer scale of the national broadband network (NBN)project has drawn interest from foreign governments including the US, where President Barack Obama has outlined similar plans.

Seventh we have:

Microsoft releases free security software

Correspondents in San Francisco | September 30, 2009

MICROSOFT has released free software that people can use to protect computers against viruses, spyware and other malicious codes in arsenals of cyber criminals.

Microsoft Security Essentials is available for download at microsoft.com/security_essentials and is built on technology that the global software giant uses in computer security programs it designs for businesses.

"With Microsoft Security Essentials, consumers can get high-quality protection that is easy to get and easy to use, and it won't get in their way," said Amy Barzdukas, general manager for consumer security at Microsoft.

"Consumers have told us that they want the protection of real-time security software but we know that too many are either unwilling or unable to pay for it, and so end up unprotected."

Microsoft hopes that the free software will be broadly adopted, particularly by those who have not been vigilant about protecting computers from hackers, and thereby "increase security across the entire Windows ecosystem".

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26146085-15306,00.html

Important to be aware this is available. I have not seen any reviews of how useful it is.

Eighth we have:

Health training on handhelds

Jennifer Foreshew | September 29, 2009

THE Rural Health Education Foundation expects to trial the delivery of its training programs, which reach an audience of 100,000 health professionals, via handheld devices within a year.

The non-profit foundation produces and packages information on a range of health and medical issues and makes it available to rural and remote areas via satellite, webcast and DVD.

It operates a network of more than 660 satellite receiving sites nationally, called the Rural Health Satellite Network. The network is one of the largest dedicated networks of its kind in the world, reaching more than 90 per cent of rural doctors and other health professionals.

More here:

http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26136966-15319,00.html

This is a network that many would not even know of. Sounds like a useful step forward.

Lastly for the week a more technical article:

Windows 7 Review

Harry McCracken (PC World (US online)) 30 September, 2009 01:59

What if a new version of Windows didn't try to dazzle you? What if, instead, it tried to disappear except when you needed it? Such an operating system would dispense with glitzy effects in favor of low-key, useful new features. Rather than pelting you with alerts, warnings, and requests, it would try to stay out of your face. And if any bundled applications weren't essential, it would dump 'em.

It's not a what-if scenario. Windows 7, set to arrive on new PCs and as a shrinkwrapped upgrade on October 22, has a minimalist feel and attempts to fix an­­noyances old and new. In contrast, Windows Vista offered a flashy new interface, but its poor performance, compatibility gotchas, and lack of compelling features made some folks regret upgrading and others refuse to leave Windows XP.

Windows 7 is hardly flawless. Some features feel unfinished; others won't realize their potential without heavy lifting by third parties. And some long-standing annoyances remain intact. But overall, the final shipping version I test-drove appears to be the worthy successor to Windows XP that Vista never was.

Microsoft's release of Windows 7 also roughly coincides with Apple's release of its new Snow Leopard; for a visual comparison of the two operating systems, see our slideshow "Snow Leopard Versus Windows 7" Read on here for an in-depth look at how Microsoft has changed its OS -mostly for the better - in Windows 7.

Heaps more here:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/320325/windows_7_review?eid=-6787

Given it is here in a week or two, this lets you know what to expect.

More next week.

David.