Quote Of The Year

Timeless Quotes - Sadly The Late Paul Shetler - "Its not Your Health Record it's a Government Record Of Your Health Information"

or

H. L. Mencken - "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

This Speech Provided Some Alarming insights To The Governments Thinking On The PCEHR.

I almost missed this article last week.

Case study to watch: how to improve ehealth record take-up

by David Donaldson

06.10.2015
An opt-out system could arrest continued low engagement with the government’s My Health system. The deputy secretary in charge says having critical mass will help convince providers to engage too.
Australia’s progress towards a widely subscribed national ehealth system remains slow, with only around 10% of the population enrolled with the government’s opt-in My Health Record system and low uptake by health practitioners.
Due to low engagement rates following its creation as an opt-in system in 2012, the Health Department plans to recommend the government adopt an opt-out policy from 2017, Department of Health deputy secretary and strategic health systems and information management special adviser Paul Madden told a Committee for the Economic Development of Australia event last week.
Madden said that the government would be advised to go for a national opt-out system in line with prior recommendations subject to the results of regional trials to take place in 2016. Transferring to opt-out was recommended by a December 2013 review into the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system.
PCEHR — which is being rebranded by the Coalition government as the My Health Record system — allows doctors, hospitals, and other healthcare providers to view and share an individual’s health information to assist in their care. This will facilitate access to records for patients no matter where they go to the doctor and should especially assist those who visit multiple providers for the same problem — potentially reaping significant benefits given the increasing chronic health challenges faced by the community.
…..
But progress remains slow. While the review recommended opt-out be introduced from the beginning of this year, legislation allowing for the regional trials and eventual national transition was only introduced to the parliament last month.
Nonetheless, although it “needs some tweaking” and usability changes, “the good news for our government is they’re not up for a really big system build,” said Madden. “The system exists, it’s been there for three years.”
And it’s been improved from where it began. Whereas the prospective customer needed to endure clicking through 17 screens to prove their identity when it was first created, the system is now down to two.
It is expected that putting records online could save the Commonwealth $2.5 billion per year within a decade by reducing inefficiencies, with an additional $1.6 billion in annual savings also delivered to the states, according to the government.
Four factors will help improve the health bottom line: increasing efficiency of access to information, enabling better coordination; moderating demand for services by giving patients information required to enable them to participate more actively in self-care; improving access to information and services to the vulnerable; and providing care providers with the tools and information required to make improved treatment decisions and to reduce the incidence of adverse events and unnecessary or duplicated services.
The full article is found here:
These three paragraphs say it all:
Nonetheless, although it “needs some tweaking” and usability changes, “the good news for our government is they’re not up for a really big system build,” said Madden. “The system exists, it’s been there for three years.”
And it’s been improved from where it began. Whereas the prospective customer needed to endure clicking through 17 screens to prove their identity when it was first created, the system is now down to two.
It is expected that putting records online could save the Commonwealth $2.5 billion per year within a decade by reducing inefficiencies, with an additional $1.6 billion in annual savings also delivered to the states, according to the government.
So the PCEHR needs just a tweak or two and billions will be saved. As they used to say when I was a nipper “Oh Yeeeeer”!
Can I have some of the happy medicine this Canberra bureaucrat is enjoying? I will leave it to the reader to assess the quality of the advice the Government is receiving!
Heavens above!
David.

Article Draft - It Is Starting To Look Like The Federal Government Has No Really Viable Plan To Properly Reset National E-Health For The Future.

With the appointment of Ms Sussan Ley to replace Mr Peter Dutton as Federal Health Minister - and the even more recent replacement of Mr Abbott by Mr Turnbull - there was some increasing expectation that effective remedies for e-Health woes and better health information use would emerge. The hope was that we might see a reset and adoption of a new evidence based direction for e-Health.
We have arrived in our present e-Health situation via almost 25 years of e-health effort which has been sadly, of recent times, really not been all they evidence based. The worst offender in this regard has been the PCEHR which was started in 2010 under Labor, launched in 2012 and three years later has seen such desultory adoption and use that the now Government is now seemingly wanting to force a PCEHR Record on all citizens who don’t choose to ‘opt-out’,  with all the risks to privacy, consent and security this entails. The work to date by both sides of politics has been pursued based on the rather dubious assumptions that electronic health is good for us and that great benefits are available for the Health Budget.
It should be stressed that the PCEHR is not the only health record system in operation in Australia; in fact, it is one of the least useful. Hospitals, GPs, specialists, laboratories etc., all have their own systems, tailored for their needs and appropriately partitioned as to content and requirements of the health professional user.
In the publicly available documentation on the system it quite clearly states that “The PCEHR System is intended to complement and not replace existing clinical information systems” and “The PCEHR is not a replacement for normal sharing of information between an individual and their healthcare provider” . I do not dispute the potential benefits achievable by using electronic health record systems, merely that the PCEHR will ever deliver any of them.  
Sadly in the last week or so there has emerged increasing evidence that there may not be as much change on the PCEHR front  as one could desire.
The evidence comes in three strands.
First, and probably most important, we had a press release from the Federal Minister for Health (Ms Sussan Ley) on October 9, 2015 entitled Developing a 21st century electronic health record system. This release outlined the composition of a new Committee which is charged with establishing a new Australian Commission for eHealth which is intended to take forward both the present national e-Health infrastructure and the National E-Health Record System which has, or will (depending on the passage of legislation) be renamed My Health Record from the previous PCEHR.
In the release the claim is made that “A functioning national electronic medical records system is essential to ensure doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other healthcare providers across the country had instant access to the information needed to treat patients safely and efficiently without having to gamble on unknowns in their medical history.” Sadly there is no evidence I am aware of that the proposed My Health Record will actually provide a working example of the system intended or deliver the benefits claimed (some $2.5Billion p.a. apparently).
Equally it is difficult to believe that a Committee made up mostly of the leaders of the failed implementation of the previous PCEHR to date, are suddenly going to develop the insight to deliver a new much better working system at this attempt. Surely a very substantial injection of new expertise and experience is needed and this has simply not happened. No real reset here.
You can read the full press release from this link:
The bottom line here is that we are going ahead, spending money and not really thinking hard about why the PCEHR System has been so unloved to date.
Second we had the announcement in early October of the criteria that were to be applied to select the sub-sets of the population who were to be used as the test populations for making the My Health Record an opt-out rather than an opt-in system. What this means is that for these test populations an individual record be created and populated by Government with available information from the MBS and PBS unless, after a public education program, the individual takes steps to notify Government they do not wish this record created.
The criteria for a population area to be included are outlined in the following quote:
“ To guide the selection of the opt-out trial sites the following criteria has been agreed by State and Territory Health Chief Executive Officers:
  • Site population of approximately 250,000-500,000.
  • Clearly defined geographical area so there is no confusion as to whether people are included or not.
  • Ability to confine communications, including electronic media, to the site.
  • Demonstrated existing eHealth capabilities and utilisation of eHealth services across local health services including General Practice, pharmacy, aged care services, and at least one hospital.
  • Higher than average PCEHR uptake by providers.
  • Strong clinical networks with a demonstrated commitment to the success of the trial - Primary Health Network/s, Local Hospital Network/s and any other relevant local health organisations within the trial site area.
  • Positive community engagement with, and local government commitment to, previous non-eHealth trials.
  • Not currently involved in, or minimal involvement with, other State, Territory and/or Commonwealth run trial activities (for example the NDIS).
  • Include a range of population groups (i.e. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, CALD backgrounds.
  • At least one of the opt-out trial sites to include rural and/or remote areas.
You can read a fuller discussion of the plans from the link:
So in summary they want to trial the opt-out process where there is good support and some considerable opt-in to PCEHR use. Might it not also be a good idea to trial in one or two regions where this is not the case to get a good understanding of possible risks and issues?
To be utterly frank I have no idea how the demented, the very young and very old, the socially isolated, the psychotic, those with a sense of paranoia regarding intrusive, invasive Government and the technophobic are going to take all this - but we shall see I guess.
Writing in mid-October it is hard to see the trials up and running before the new year and then running for long enough to be properly evaluated and the broader scheme, if it is to come and all the ‘wrinkles’ can be managed before mid-2017. That may even turn out to be optimistic.
Third we had the following from a speech given by the DoH Chief Information Officer in late September 2015. To quote from the report of the speech to CEDA given by Mr Madden:
“But progress remains slow. While the review recommended opt-out be introduced from the beginning of this year, legislation allowing for the regional trials and eventual national transition was only introduced to the parliament last month.
Nonetheless, although it “needs some tweaking” and usability changes, “the good news for our government is they’re not up for a really big system build,” said Madden. “The system exists, it’s been there for three years.”
And it’s been improved from where it began. Whereas the prospective customer needed to endure clicking through 17 screens to prove their identity when it was first created, the system is now down to two.”
Mr Madden’s claims regarding benefits of the system are also, to my eye, and putting it gently, pure fantasy. To quote again:
“ It is expected that putting records online could save the Commonwealth $2.5 billion per year within a decade by reducing inefficiencies, with an additional $1.6 billion in annual savings also delivered to the states, according to the government.”
Here is the link to the relevant article:
Overall what all this reveals to me is an utterly clueless collection of bureaucrats who are steaming on attempting to implement an evidence free program in the absence of a coherent National E-Health Strategy and before any appropriate governance mechanisms are in place to look after the interests of what are a very broad range of stakeholders.
This is all going to end very expensively and very badly I predict.
-----
Comments welcome

David

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

If You Want To Know How Thin The Air Is In Canberra Try This? They Need To Come Back To Reality!

In the press release on the new Committee formed to establish the ACeH we find the following:

Developing a 21st century electronic health record system

Minister for Health Sussan Ley has announced the Committee that will oversee the rebooted personalised My Health Record system for patients and doctors.
Page last updated: 09 October 2015
9 October 2015
Minister for Health Sussan Ley today announced the Committee that will oversee the rebooted personalised My Health Record system for patients and doctors as part of a $485 million package to deliver Australians an electronic medical record system.
Ms Ley announced the appointment of Ms Robyn Kruk AM as the independent chair of the eHealth Implementation Taskforce Steering Committee responsible for the establishment of the Australian Commission for eHealth.
“A functioning national electronic medical records system is essential to ensure doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other healthcare providers across the country had instant access to the information needed to treat patients safely and efficiently without having to gamble on unknowns in their medical history,” Ms Ley said.
“As patients, we’ve all been in the situations where we’ve had to attend another GP surgery because we were out-of-town or couldn’t get an appointment with our regular doctor. It can be a time consuming and often frustrating experience for patients and doctors alike.”
The full release is found here:
See the italicized extract!
Enough even… Can we have the evidence that confirms the validity and truth of this sort of assertion and that the value offered to patients and clinicians is actually worth the very substantial costs and risks to privacy etc. While I am no luddite I can see no evidence regarding how vital such a record system is! Anyone have any?
We really have had an appalling level of justification for this initiative and have had it like this ever since the PCEHR “thought bubble” appeared. This is even more true considering how ill-conceived the solution that has been developed was.

As for the PCEHR being a 21st Century system....get a grip!
It really is pretty sad.
David.

Monday, October 12, 2015

Weekly Australian Health IT Links – 12th October, 2015.

Here are a few I have come across the last week or so.
Note: Each link is followed by a title and a few paragraphs. For the full article click on the link above title of the article. Note also that full access to some links may require site registration or subscription payment.

General Comment

A quiet week until Friday afternoon when we heard about the ‘start-up’ committee for the ACeH and absolutely zero about what it would do, by when etc.
Too many news items to list - browse for the details.
-----

Ex-CIOs appointed to Australian e-health records committee

Madden, Walsh to ovesee My Health Record 'reboot'.

By Staff Writer
Oct 9 2015 5:06PM
Former health CIOs Paul Madden and Michael Walsh will join fellow electronic health experts on the 11- person steering committee charged with guiding the revised implementation of personal electronic health records in Australia.
Health Minister Sussan Ley today named the inaugural members of the eHealth implementation taskforce steering committee, which will be chaired by chief executive of the National Mental Health Commission Robyn Kruk.
Paul Madden was until recently the CIO of the federal Department of Health, and has been at the forefront of the push for personally controlled electronic health records since the program was originally funded in 2010.
-----

Case study to watch: how to improve ehealth record take-up

by David Donaldson

06.10.2015
An opt-out system could arrest continued low engagement with the government’s My Health system. The deputy secretary in charge says having critical mass will help convince providers to engage too.
Australia’s progress towards a widely subscribed national ehealth system remains slow, with only around 10% of the population enrolled with the government’s opt-in My Health Record system and low uptake by health practitioners.
Due to low engagement rates following its creation as an opt-in system in 2012, the Health Department plans to recommend the government adopt an opt-out policy from 2017, Department of Health deputy secretary and strategic health systems and information management special adviser Paul Madden told a Committee for the Economic Development of Australia event last week.
-----

Medical, pharmaceutical groups call for prescription monitoring system to stop doctor shopping

Date October 8, 2015 - 12:15AM

Harriet Alexander

Health Reporter

Nathan Attard was methodical and determined in the way he went about obtaining prescription medicine.
In the 12 months before his death, he saw 22 different doctors and obtained 75 scripts for benzodiazepines and drugs containing opioids.
During the inquest into his 2012 death from multi-drug toxicity, an independent expert observed he had "worked out a system that enabled him to obtain the medicines that he was looking for, without actually triggering alarm bells for anybody".
Although doctors and pharmacists keep their own records, no states or territories outside Tasmania have centralised electronic systems that capture in real time which controlled drugs have been prescribed and dispensed to individual patients.
-----

Pharmacists and doctors team up on real-time monitoring

8 October, 2015 Meg Pigram 
Pharmacists and doctors have teamed up to complain about the “extremely slow” roll-out of a national system to efficiently monitor the prescribing and dispensing of controlled drugs.
Funding for the system, known as Electronic Recording and Reporting of Controlled Drugs (ERRCD),  was approved in the 2010 5CPA negotiations, but so far only Tasmania has implemented it.
Now the Pharmacy Guild of Australia, PSA and the SHPA have teamed up with the AMA, RACGP and other organisations to write a joint letter to Federal Health Minister Sussan Ley and her state and territory counterparts.
-----

Phone-based abortion service in TGA's sights

7 October 2015
THE TGA will investigate the safety and ethics of a new telephone-based service providing access to medical abortions.
The service, provided by the Tabbot Foundation, is offered in the first 63 days of pregnancy for women living within an hour’s travel of an emergency medical facility.
“The Commonwealth Department of Health is considering the implications of this arrangement on the health and wellbeing of women in the context of the access provided by telehealth consultations,” a departmental spokeswoman says.
Also to be examined by the TGA is whether telephone-mediated pregnancy termination complies with the authority required by prescribers to offer mifepristone and misoprostol (MS-2 Step, Linepharma) under the PBS and the guidelines for dispensing pharmaceuticals by mail.
-----
Health | Wed Oct 7, 2015 10:18am EDT
Related: Health

Electronic health records software often written without doctors’ input

By Kathryn Doyle
(Reuters Health) - The reason why many doctors find electronic health records (EHR) difficult to use might be that the software wasn't properly tested, researchers suggests.
Current guidelines and industry standards suggest that new EHR software should be tested by at least 15 end users with a clinical background to make sure they are usable and safe before they get federal certification.
But a new study finds that many certified products did not actually conduct this user testing, or did so without clinical testers.
Despite the guidelines, “there’s no explicit requirement for end user testers to have a clinical background,” said Raj M. Ratwani of MedStar Health in Washington, D.C., who worked on the study.
-----

Trial sites selection process

  • Trial sites selection process
A review of the PCEHR system (PCEHR Review) was undertaken in 2013. It found that there was overwhelming support for continuing implementation of a nationally consistent electronic health record system for all Australians, but that a change in approach was needed to correct early implementation issues. The PCEHR Review made thirty-eight recommendations aimed at making the system more usable and able to deliver the expected benefits in a shorter period. The recommendations include establishing new governance arrangements, moving to an opt-out system for individual participation, and improving system usability and the clinical content of records.
-----

GPs seek relief from guideline overload

Alice Klein | 8 October, 2015 | 
Australian GPs are suffering from ‘guideline overload' and want more succinct clinical practice guidelines that are easier to access, research shows.
Almost all GPs want clinical guidelines to be presented as one-page checklists, flowcharts or 2-3-page summaries, with only 1% preferring detailed manuals, a survey of 79 GPs from NSW and SA has found.
Many respondents complained that clinical guidelines were too hard to find and suggested that they should be incorporated into practice software to make them more accessible.
"The problem with guidelines in general practice is that one GP could never know all the guidelines, and the field is too vast," one GP told the researchers from the University of SA and the University of Sydney.
-----

The Forgetting Health System

October 7, 2015
Learning health systems are the next big thing. Through the use of information technology, the hope is that we can analyse all the data captured in electronic health records to speed both the process of scientific discovery and the translation of these discoveries into routine practice1,2. Every patient’s data, their response to treatment, and final outcome, will no longer be filed away, but feed the care of future patients3. It’s an exciting vision, and if we can achieve it, there is no doubt healthcare delivery would be transformed.
If we were to step back, we might conclude that although this is an admirable vision, for all its failings, the machinery of science is already working faster than we can handle it. The arena where organizational learning most needs to take hold is in the way we deliver health services. It is clear that we could do so much better in this arena. There is too much variation in patient care, too much waste and harm in the system.
-----

WA Health to finally end IT leadership limbo

CIO role up for grabs after five-year wait.

By Paris Cowan
Oct 7 2015 6:30AM
WA Health has finally begun taking applications for a chief information officer role that has remained in the hands of temporary appointees since 2010.
On Saturday the department posted a job ad seeking candidates to become CIO of the 43,000-strong department on a five year contract.
The recruitment drive follows a five-year revolving door at the top of WA Health's IT wing, the health information network (HIN), which has been linked by some parliamentarians to the government’s failure to commission IT services at the new Fiona Stanley Hospital on time.
-----

Hackers target Australian health sector, selling records for A$1,000

Beverley Head

Healthcare records in Australia are a major target for hackers – with fully populated medical records sold to fraudsters for up to A$1,000 each

Hackers are targeting the Australian health sector, with fully populated digital health records sold on the black market for up to A$1,000 each.
Plans to make the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) an opt-out – rather than the current opt-in regime – could significantly expand the range of targets for health hackers.
Carl Leonard, principal security analyst for Websense, said healthcare around the world is now experiencing 340% more attacks than the average industry sector. He said that, in 2014, there was a phenomenal 600% increase in the number of attacks launched against hospitals – and Australia is no exception.
-----

Your phone and watch could warn you of deadly heart problems. So why don’t they?

October 9, 2015 1.59am AEDT

Author

  1. David Glance  Director of UWA Centre for Software Practice, University of Western Australia
The heart rate measurement feature in the Apple Watch was intended as an aid to those using the device during exercise sessions. For a teenage boy it proved a lifesaver as a high heart rate reading prompted him to seek medical help which led to the discovery that he was suffering from a condition called rhabdomyolysis which can lead to kidney damage.
Since teenager Paul Houle’s story, similar incidents have been reported of people seeking help on noticing abnormal heart rates being measured by their watch. Australian journalist Gary Barker acted immediately on seeing his Apple Watch report his heart rate behaving erratically and spiking between 50 and 150 beats a minute. The irregular heart beat was later diagnosed as being caused by atrial fibrillation, a condition that can lead to heart failure and stroke.
-----

An app to help prepare for end-of-life care

7 October 2015
ACCORDING to research done at the Stanford Medical School, there can be reluctance among doctors to discuss end-of-life wishes with their patients. 
We acknowledge the importance of being aware of an individual’s wishes, however it too often gets passed over during consults and not thought of until it is too late. The Stanford Medical School has developed the Stanford Letter Project to help facilitate these discussions.
On opening the app, the user is guided to choose a language. Once chosen there are a series of prompts to cover the key decisions for end-of-life care.
-----

Royal Hobart Hospital trials virtual online training

Telepresence system will enable hospital staff to be trained remotely
Biomedical staff at Royal Hobart Hospital are receiving training on advanced medical equipment from clinicians in other parts of Australia under a new telepresence system trial.
Royal Hobart Hospital is a large tertiary referral centre that is geographically isolated and education and support for its biomedical staff is limited, said the hospital's specialist anaesthetist, Dr Savas Totonidis.
“We have all the advanced equipment and naturally are expected to perform at the same level as our mainland counterparts; the critical difference for us is training,” he said.
-----

24,000 Kiwis impacted as Labour brands Ministry of Health data breach “inexcusable”

“Any breach of this magnitude is unacceptable, full stop.”
A privacy breach, which has seen the unauthorised release of confidential birth and death details of over 24,000 Kiwis, has been branded “inexcusable” by the Labour Party.
As reported by the New Zealand Herald; officials are investigating how a spreadsheet of National Health Index (NHI) numbers, containing the birth and death dates of 24,092 people, was emailed to around 950 pharmacists yesterday morning. The email was supposed to be sent internally.
Following the revelations, Labour’s Health spokesperson Annette King has claimed the Ministry of Health’s blunder, “is shocking, whether unintentional or not.”
“Patients must be able to trust the information they give to doctors will only be accessible to staff involved in their treatment,” King claims.
-----

Online therapy? Not so crazy after all

Mental health care is not accessible to everyone. It’s a fact that less than fifty percent of people who need treatment actually get it. But access to an internet connection is available to most people. So it makes sense to offer more health services online.
Although the opinions are divided about Dr Google, health experts now agree on one thing: internet therapy for many mental health problems works.

5 benefits

E-mental health is a broad term used for mental health services delivered via internet programs, telehealth, mobile phone applications and websites. There are five benefits:
  1. It can be accessed anytime and anywhere
  2. There are no or low costs to patients
  3. It fills service gaps
  4. It reduces wait lists
  5. It’s cost-effective to the health system.
-----
Editorials

Providing a lifeline for rural doctors

Tim Baker
Med J Aust 2015; 203 (7): 277.
doi: 10.5694/mja15.00768
Telemedicine programs are often designed to meet the needs of specialists rather than rural doctors
Australia has almost twice as many small rural hospital-based emergency facilities as designated emergency departments.1 They see 16% of Australia’s emergency patient presentations, or almost 1.3 million presentations each year.1 Although small rural facilities are tasked with managing mainly minor injury and illness, they also treat patients with complex and time critical problems.2 These facilities are staffed by nurses alone, or by junior doctors, general practitioners or rural generalists. Rural doctors often have specific training for rural emergency medicine, and they usually have more years of experience than junior doctors who treat most patients in urban emergency departments. What they lack is immediate access to onsite specialist advice.
Tertiary specialty units that receive patients from rural areas are often aware of this deficit. Concerned about the poor outcomes for their rural patients (although rural–urban outcome research is often confounded by hard-to-control-for factors3), some have created systems to provide a lifeline for early advice and support. A recent systematic review4 described tele-emergency programs that provide support for stroke thrombolysis, trauma management, burns care, eye conditions and several other specific problems.
-----

A 21st-century health system means seamless care and ongoing reform

October 7, 2015 6.28am AEDT
Australia’s century-old federation is under strain.

Author Stephen Duckett

Director, Health Program, Grattan Institute
Australia’s new prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has announced what he calls a “21st-century government”. This article is part of The Conversation’s series focusing on what such a government should look like.
Things have changed a lot in the last century. In 1915, the first automatic telephone exchange in Australia had just been opened and “Billy” Hughes became our seventh prime minister. He went on to become one of our most colourful, charting a tumultuous course through Australian politics.
A century later we have a new prime minister facing a profoundly different world. Politics is as tumultuous as ever but technology has changed radically, utterly transforming the way we live, the nature of our work, and our health.
-----

Orion Health awarded subcontract in DOD's military modernization project

Written by Akanksha Jayanthi (Twitter | Google+)  | October 05, 2015
The Department of Defense has awarded Orion Health a subcontract to link disparate IT systems and facilitate the interoperability between them as part of the Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization Program.
Orion Health joins the Leidos/Cerner/Accenture team which in July won the DOD's contract to overhaul the military's health records.
Orion Health, a population health management provider, will utilize its Rhapsody Integration Engine to link the DOD's new Cerner EHR system to civilian facilities.
-----

Orion Health nails US Department of Defence tech deal

“Our expert domain knowledge in integration is now opening up a number of new opportunities for us all around the world."
Orion Health has been appointed as the integration and interoperability partner as a member of the Leidos syndicate that has been awarded a major contract by the Department of Defence (DoD) in the United States.
The Leidos Partnership for Defence Health will provide an electronic health record (EHR) off-the-shelf solution, integration activities and deployment across the Military Health System.
The contract, known as the Defence Healthcare Management System Modernisation (DHMSM), is an initiative designed to modernise the military’s healthcare system, enabling patients and clinicians to capture and share health data more efficiently.
-----

Orion Health seals UK software deal with Boots chain

“Working with a highly respected and recognised brand such as Boots, is a great endorsement for the fantastic work our team is doing in the UK."
New Zealand healthcare technology company Orion Health has signed a strategic new contract in the United Kingdom with Boots, a member of the Walgreens Boots Alliance, a retail pharmacy network.
Terms of the deal will see Orion Health technology utilised to provide a solution that supports community pharmacists in the delivery of in-store clinical services which have previously been provided on paper or in a variety of IT systems.
This capability is increasingly relevant as health economies opt to move care closer to the community, to reduce the burden on acute services, and to offer individuals a community based option for many services.
-----

Telstra Health continues with acquisition strategy

Telstra Health has entered into an agreement to acquire Silver Chain Group technology arm EOS Technologies, developers of the award winning community care management system, ComCare.
Under the deal EOS will be integrated into Telstra’s HealthConnex business. No financial details of the transaction were released by Telstra.
Telstra’s recent investments in the health area include UK health analytics firm Dr Foster, Medibank’s Anywhere Healthcare, and iCareHealth, one of Australia’s primary providers of software solutions to the aged care sector.
-----

Telstra retail boss Gordon Ballantyne quits telco

Mitchell Bingemann

Gordon Ballantyne, the man who helped Telstra lure back five million mobile customers, is leaving the telco giant after five years overseeing the company’s retail operations.
Mr Ballantyne will finish his stint with Telstra (TLS) in December and enjoy a break before exploring new opportunities.
At 11.10am (AEDT), Telstra shares were trading 1.6 per cent lower at $5.61, in a weak market.
Mr Ballantyne joined Telstra as its consumer chief in 2010 at a time when the telco giant had weathered four profit downgrades and as exorbitant prices for its services pushed customers to its rivals.
-----

Telstra, Silver Chain in health care deal

Peter Klinger
October 9, 2015, 6:14 am
Silver Chain Group, the not-for-profit organisation that provides home care health services to more than 83,000 patients, has become the surprise source of Telstra’s latest quest to unearth the next great technology.
The Perth-based organisation said yesterday it had struck a deal to sell its EOS Technologies subsidiary to Telstra Health.
Financial details of the deal were not revealed and Silver Chain is not saying how much cash it has pumped into EOS, which developed the ComCare community care management system that is used by the group’s more than 3000 staff and volunteers.
-----

Telstra reshuffles executives, acquires eHealth management system

Telstra has seen three internal promotions and one departure among its executives this week, with the telco also acquiring eHealth management company EOS Technologies.
By Corinne Reichert | October 9, 2015 -- 06:32 GMT (17:32 AEDT) | Topic: Telcos
Telstra has announced the appointment of three new group executives, as well as the departure of its Retail group executive Gordon Ballantyne, amid a refocus for the telecommunications provider on "strategic growth".
Karsten Wildberger will be promoted from group managing director of Consumer and acting group managing director of Products to the AU$18 billion portfolio of group executive of Retail; Cynthia Whelan, currently the group managing director of Strategic Finance and acting group executive of International, will be appointed group executive of International and New Businesses; and Joe Pollard will be the new chief marketing officer and group executive of Media, promoted from his present role of group MD of Media and Marketing.
All three will report directly to Telstra CEO Andrew Penn, who said the appointments would help drive the company's agenda for continued strategic growth.
-----

Region fears businesses will abandon Tasmania's west coast because it will get NBN satellite, not fibre

October 8, 2015
There are fears of population decline and businesses abandoning Tasmania's west coast because the region will not receive fibre-to-the-node or premises under the NBN.
Media player: "Space" to play, "M" to mute, "left" and "right" to seek.
The local council has vowed to mobilise its community and industry leaders to lobby the Federal Government to overturn a decision to service the region with the NBN satellite service.
Mayor Phil Vickers has raised his concerns with federal Member for Braddon Brett Whiteley, and argues there are viable ways to bring fibre to some towns.
"We're not remote...we've got five fully blown towns. Within our five townships we do have Telstra infrastructure and we do have the Hydro Tasmania poles and wires," Cr Vickers said.
-----

Australian researchers make quantum computing breakthrough, paving way for world-first chip

Date October 6, 2015 - 2:00AM

Hannah Francis

Technology Reporter

Crucial hurdle overcome for quantum computing

The world'€™s first calculation using two quantum bits in silicon has been demonstrated by a team of engineers at UNSW Australia. (Vision courtesy UNSW)
Australian scientists have discovered a way to put quantum computing technology into silicon computer chips, paving the way for the first commercial manufacture of the holy grail in superfast computing.
For decades scientists have been trying to turn quantum computing — which allows for multiple calculations to happen at once, making it immeasurably faster than standard computing — into a practical reality rather than a moonshot theory. Until now, they have largely relied on "exotic" materials to construct quantum computers, making them unsuitable for commercial production.
But researchers at the University of New South Wales have patented a new design, published in the scientific journal Nature on Tuesday, created specifically with computer industry manufacturing standards in mind and using affordable silicon, which is found in regular computer chips like those we use every day in smartphones or tablets.
-----
Enjoy!
David.